I received a chip that was created 12 hours ago, but it's still an unconfirmed chip creation. Why do you hand out unconfirmed bitcoins after the mixing? How can I now be sure that this btc will ever confirm?
It was probably because of this: SourceThe mempool just spiked. ChipMixer used a fee which was enough for the time he sent, but it quickly grow up, so others got priorized.
If you are in a hurry, you can just spend the coins right away (even if still unconfirmed) by import them in Electrum, then using a high fee to CPFP your transaction. (basically, miners will want to confirm your transaction because of the high fee, but they will need to confirm the one from ChipMixer first, so both will go through at the same time)
|
|
|
I think it has something to do with the fact that "quoting" is basically a reply (which is why it opens the "post reply" page when you click on it). And you can't reply to a locked thread. So, it was meant to work like this.
You can alredy make a quote manually (by getting the unixtime, link, author and using it in the quote format). So, Maybe I can try creating a script for this, if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
-
This message has nothing to do with mods removing posts. must be missing or out of your limit.
|
|
|
Regarding the watch only wallet : I transfered some bitcoin to it by accident, maybe any of you can guide me on how to send this to my standard wallet ?
You didn't understand how this works. - Your Bitcoin is in the address X. You have a watch-only wallet with the address X. This means that you can only "watch/see" this address (balance, transactions, etc... but not spend). To have the same as a "Standard wallet" for your address X, you need the private-key. The only way you can recover these coins is if you manage to get your address X private-key and import it in electrum (the private-key). It will basically create the same wallet as you have now, but with the capacity to spend the coins.
|
|
|
I'm curious about something if anyone has a bot. I've recently surpassed the 250 sr member earnt merit threshold: 1. How many people have reached this mark 2. How many people have more than 1250 total merit (as its harder to get when you're over 1000 imo - I don't hand them out as readily anyway to legendaries). 3. How many have more than 1500 And other merit analysis you can come up with.
(I'm specifically interested in this campaign as I assume bpip can handle the forum as a whole).
See this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667
|
|
|
5/ I don't know how to trace it so read some internet advice to install electrum and import the address.
That's right. But what you had to do is import the address private-key, and not just import it to a watch-only address.
The only chance you have to get your coins is if you manage to get your address private-key. From what you said, it looks like you still have your wallet "wallet.dat" file, right? I'm not sure why it would show as empty when you synchronized it, but you can try getting your private-key from it (assuming the file isn't corruped or somthing like this). Try opening Bitcoin Core again with the same file (from your disk or big computer) and exporting the private-key: - launch your bitcoin client as usual and wait for it to load the blockchain and start up - click on 'help' in the menu bar (top right) - click on 'debug window' - select the 'console' tab - if your wallet has a password, type: walletpassphrase "your walletpassphrase here" 600 - type: dumpprivkey [your Bitcoin address here] this will return the private key, you can copy it now; ensure you clear your clipboard/history afterwards
Then, just import the private-key into Electrum. See if this works.
|
|
|
I have created the watch only wallet just to try to see my old transaction that i lost track with. After that, I generated a Receive address from this wallet to Coinbase, i made a transfer from Coinbase.
What do you mean with "lost track" with your old transaction? Was it a Bitcoin Core wallet? And if it was, what happened to it? Do you still have access to that wallet? Where was the wallet you used to get that address? Please answer these questions. (they say i need a private key to sweep but i don't have a clue where i can find that)
You do. Without the private-key, all you can do is watch the wallet (thus why it is called a "watch-only" wallet).
|
|
|
Where and what are you trying to post? Is this happening on every board you try to post?
|
|
|
Quick question about Online Hot Wallets what if your Computer is compromised wouldn't the password and 2-Factor Authentication be no different than Electrum with a password and no 2FA? Just a question of curiosity don't rip my head off please lol I understand Online Hot Wallets equals = DO NOT USE... I am worried my Computer might be compromised you all make it seem like if I make a large Bitcoin Purchase from my Electrum Wallet I will get jacked for all my Bitcoin because I never payed a Ledger Nano S which I would if it was slightly cheaper.
When someone gets your password (due to your computer being compromised), they can at any time copy your wallet and spend your coins. So, that means your coins are totally compromised. If you're using a 2FA wallet, at least you need the 2FA code (which changes every 30 seconds) to spend the money. This means that the hacker can only steal your coins if he's seeing your screen (or what you type) at the moment you try to make a tx and type the code (so he can use it first in his own device). Or... if he also infected the device which has the 2FA (e.g you phone). If you think your computer is compromised, DON'T SEND ANY MONEY TO ANY WALLET ON IT. If you do, there is a chance your coins will be stolen. What you need to do is format your computer and do a clean reinstall, then create a new brand wallet, and then send your coins to it. Now, if you really want to be 100% safe, buy a Nano S or Trezor and use it to store your coins.
|
|
|
So, if I understood correctly... are you saying that you imported one of your Bitcoin Core addresses into an Electrum watch-only address? Or else, how did you create this watch-only wallet?
Do you still have access to this Bitcoin Core wallet that has your coins? (if that's the case)
|
|
|
@Adriano, libera o sistema de trust em todas abas.
Acho que só o theymos pode fazer isso. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Se eu não me engano, ele fez isso propositalmente com a intenção de evitar argumentos ad-hominem. A lógica dele é de que se o board tem relação com compras/vendas/trocas ou alguns outros critérios, vai aparecer o trust da pessoa nos posts. Caso contrario, não aparece pra evitar que isso seja usado como ataque durante as discussões (e.g você está negativado então sua opinião está errada). Enfim, acho que já saímos do assunto do tópico (se bem que não importa muito já que todos podemos afirmar que isso é um scam). edit: caso queira ver se o seu "DT está funcionando", é só colocar ;dt no final da url
Esqueci dessa. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Desculpe acabar com sua felicidade, mas pra mim seu trust é 0/0 ainda. rsrs Edit: mesmo assim ele ficou negativado por voce. Interessante, não sabia que rolava isso.
O DT não tem nada a ver com o score. Uma coisa é estar no DT1/DT2, o que torna seus feedbacks confiáveis. Outra coisa é sua pontuação pessoal (que muda de acordo com o feedback deixado por outros DT1/DT2). Meu score é 0/0 por que não recebi nenhum feedback positivo/negativo de outros DT. Mas por estar na lista de alguns DT1, eu me torno DT2.
|
|
|
Também ja dei neg trust nele. Aparentemente eu estou no DT2, então acho que meus feedbacks aparecem por padrão (se alguém poder confirmar, agradeço).
edit: @offtopic, percebi ao olhar a minha pagina de trust la no loyce.club que o vit05 foi banido. Ele também era ativo na aba Português. Deve ter sido por plagiarismo, mas é triste. ::
|
|
|
The list isn't publicly available (to avoid people begging them for merit). This is the list of the users that received the most merit. There is also a list that shows the users that spent the most merit, which isn't necessarily the list of merit sources. However, chances of the merit sources being in there are high (for obvious reasons: if they receive sMerits constantly for free, they spend more than the regular user).
|
|
|
-snip-
No one from “The Gang” needs to manage the campaign. I’m pretty sure everybody would be happy with any manager that actually cares about what their participants are posting. Now, the fact that you and the other users need to pull out this “the gang” card everywhere and every single time in the forum makes your whole case (about the DT abuse and etc) go down. And no one is ever going to take you seriously because of that. I actually dislike many of these users attitudes (so no asskissing here), but you are just plain stupid. Going full-troll is never the answer.
|
|
|
I thought it's 300 good reports... HCP, please report 52 posts and let us know if you see it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Ops... you are right. Just did some research and found this: No, it's most likely 300 good reports. I don't have the link, and my repot "baseline" is: You have reported 313 posts with 97% accuracy (293 good, 11 bad, 9 unhandled).
Right okay. That's interesting. Let us know once you get those 7 good reports I now have the link. Unfortunately, I didn't quite make the 300 mark, but overshot to 301 ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) You have reported 321 posts with 97% accuracy (301 good, 11 bad, 9 unhandled)
|
|
|
It worked for me. Try this: // ==UserScript== // @name @name LoyceV ShowAll Chrome Extension // @include https://bitcointalk.org/* // @author @author Initscri (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=186520) // ==/UserScript==
function getQueryParams(qs) { qs = qs.split('+').join(' ');
var params = {}, tokens, re = /[?&]?([^=]+)=([^&]*)/g;
while (tokens = re.exec(qs)) { params[decodeURIComponent(tokens[1])] = decodeURIComponent(tokens[2]); }
return params; }
var LoyceVShowAllChromeExtension = { logPrefix: 'LoyceV Show All Chrome Extension V1.0', verbose: true, // I mean, you should probably leave this on. logIfVerbose: function(message) { var controller = this;
if(controller.verbose == true) { console.log(controller.logPrefix + ': ' + message); } }, checkIfOnTopicPage: function() { var controller = this;
// Get the mirrortab_back container. var mirrortab_b = document.getElementsByClassName("mirrortab_back")[0]; var url_identifier = '//bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic='; // This also ensures this only runs on BitcoinTalk, and not similar SMF forums which share the same URL structure. var cur_url = window.location.href;
// Check if mirrortab is avail, and on topic page. if(mirrortab_b != null && cur_url.indexOf(url_identifier) !== -1) { // on a BitcoinTalk.org topic page, proceed. console.log('Adding Show All Link'); controller.addShowAllLinkForTopic(mirrortab_b); } }, addShowAllLinkForTopic(location) { var controller = this;
// First, get the topic ID from the url. var queryParams = getQueryParams(document.location.href); var topicId = queryParams['https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic']; topicId = topicId.substring(0, topicId.indexOf('.')); topicId = topicId.replace('.', '');
if(location != null && topicId != null) { // Adding! var nodeSeperator = document.createElement('span'); nodeSeperator.innerHTML = ' | ';
// Create the link var nodeLink = document.createElement('a'); nodeLink.setAttribute('href', 'http://loyce.club/showall/' + topicId + '.html'); nodeLink.setAttribute('target', '_BLANK');
// Set the icon of the link. nodeLink.innerHTML = 'Show All';
// And set the link! controller.logIfVerbose('Setting the link!'); location.appendChild(nodeSeperator); location.appendChild(nodeLink);
controller.logIfVerbose('All Done!'); } }, init: function() { var controller = this;
// Check if on topic page. // And this runs everything else. controller.checkIfOnTopicPage(); } }
setTimeout(function() { LoyceVShowAllChromeExtension.init(); }, 500); It adds this option (I had to look for it): ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F14%2Fblob92bdfa3cf042e49d.png&t=663&c=B4SijUNEA9osdA) sorry for the off-topic
|
|
|
Is that page meant to display a list of posts you have reported? All I see is my a brief overview of my "stats"... "You have reported 248 posts with 100% accuracy..." etc... but I don't see a list? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) You need to get 300 good reports to see that list. edit: 300 not 500.
|
|
|
Is there any way to get a message to Blender? The notice was way too short and I still have Bitcoin with the service.
Probably not. They never disclosed any email or form of contact other than their website support and this account. The website is down, and they haven't logged in here since May 31th. Y'all are in a bad spot in here. :/
|
|
|
Update your Electrum to the latest version. Versions older than < 3.3 don’t synchronize anymore.
Your addresses (and everything else) will be the same. But make sure you wrote down your backup seed anyways.
P.S: be careful with the phishing websites! Always double check the URL.
|
|
|
|