 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Can you look at optimizing 210,9 for RTX cards, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to improve performance for RTX cards and equihash 210,9 ?
|
|
|
|
Mining AION with v1.5q_cuda10_linux-x64 - perhaps an issue with the fee pool in this release? when I get to 98% share submits I start getting: [ERROR ] Cannot connect to any mining pool!!! Hi invizion, this can happen if connection to all your pools is lost. Generally the message disappears when the pool is online again. The miner also stops mining after a while if the pools stay down (and it cannot connect to any of your mining pool). If you specified failover pools the miner should connect to the second (or third) pool. Unfortunately there is a bug in the latest version and failover pools are not working... We got this error now and it will be fixed in the next update. Cheers v1.5q2 fixed the issue thanks! Question, does OC1/OC2 work for all algos? What determines "power saving" to use OC1 vs OC2? |
|
|
|
|
Please optimize 210.9 for RTX cards too
<3
|
|
|
|
Mining AION with v1.5q_cuda10_linux-x64 - perhaps an issue with the fee pool in this release? when I get to 98% share submits I start getting: [ERROR ] Cannot connect to any mining pool!!! |
|
|
|
I would like to search the whole thread for this, but I dont see the function to do so. Is it possible to set API to 0.0.0.0 so I can access the API from different computer?
You can access API/Telemetry from different computer as long as the port specified in config file (default 10555) allows incoming connections by host firewall (assuming there is firewall). e.g if miner is on same network as PC: http://miner.local:10555 or http://192.168.x.x:10555 (whatever miner local IP is) If want to view API from outside network you will need to port forward within your router. |
|
|
|
Looking forward to improved performance for Equihash 210,9 on RTX cards if possible  |
|
|
|
YoBit: Deposit\Withdrawal coin will be available after you upgrade the source code of the wallet. Unfortunately the developers are in no hurry to send you updates
- therefore, in order to avoid the loss of users, the network is not available.
If you have updated the source code of the coin, send us (https://yobit.net/en/maintenance_request/ Free)and we will promptly correct the problem on the coin. That seems rather copy/paste-ish. Don't Yobit have a really bad reputation for doing updates? (edit: yep, do a Google search for " Unfortunately the developers are in no hurry to send you updates" and you'll see it's a form reply.) I noticed recently that GLC seems to have come out of maint (briefly) at Yobit, around the end of May 2019. One of my test deposits - which I think was sent sometime last year - has been quietly credited to my account. The current status is, again, in maint. I previously maintained the source code for yobit and have since removed the repository due to several security issues that went unpatched as interest was lost. As such, to my knowledge, yobit no longer runs the daemon and the coins trading within are walled off - it’s an internal database only with no deposits, no withdrawals and no transfers. There’s really no point trying to rally this, p.s I still hold over 10M GLC that I’m happy to dump on any market making attempts, the cryptsy hackers also control the number 1 wallet (over 40% of all coins). |
|
|
|
If GLC is to be "reborn" then the tiny block reward will probably have to be addressed. The current reward is only 0.00610351 GLC per block, which is 1/16384th the value of the original reward of 100 GLC. Could only be a couple more halvings before the output is so small that the network considers it dust, and it doesn't even get added to the miner's wallet (this has happened with another coin I mine.) I've been progressively consolidating small (mined) unspent outputs, but now it's come to the point where even trying to send 0.1 GLC fails.  How do long term hodlers feel? On the one hand, increasing the block reward will dilute existing hodlings, but on the other, without a change, miners have no incentive to secure the network. Give up. What possible use is there for this shitcoin among a sea of shitcoins? Don't dwell on it, move on. It was never anything and it will never be. I think its funny how you call a 6 year old project "shit" and think its solely down town the devs to be promoters, community support and suppose to have contacts like amazon that we can just snap our fingers and we have a deal. I'm sorry to disappoint you but life doesn't work like that. If we had as much support as other coins like ethereum then companies would have taken notice but this coin was released during a time when every coin had a pre-mine and was usually a scam. This was never a scam and never will be. We just wanted to release a simple coin that could be used globally. Attempting to compare a litecoin copypaste to Ethereum, fuck off lol. You just came back to try and climb on the Facebook Globalcoin samename bandwagon and hope to unload your bags on some idiots. Pitty they changed the name on you, it's now Libra or something; so you can piss back off like you did all those years ago. |
|
|
|
If GLC is to be "reborn" then the tiny block reward will probably have to be addressed. The current reward is only 0.00610351 GLC per block, which is 1/16384th the value of the original reward of 100 GLC. Could only be a couple more halvings before the output is so small that the network considers it dust, and it doesn't even get added to the miner's wallet (this has happened with another coin I mine.) I've been progressively consolidating small (mined) unspent outputs, but now it's come to the point where even trying to send 0.1 GLC fails. How do long term hodlers feel? On the one hand, increasing the block reward will dilute existing hodlings, but on the other, without a change, miners have no incentive to secure the network. Give up. What possible use is there for this shitcoin among a sea of shitcoins? Don't dwell on it, move on. It was never anything and it will never be. |
|
|
|
Mark Zuckerberg will buy GlobalCoin, this is very good news
You’re a fucking idiot lol |
|
|
|
|
Is there updated benchmarks for next gen cards and AION (Equi210,9)?
2060
2070
2080
|
|
|
|
I like being optimistic too  1080 --> 228 580 --> 139 |
|
|
|
What coin is everyone mining with this now?
AION |
|
|
|
|
Does v0.6 have any improvements over v0.5 for Aion in particular?
Edit: I'm getting close to a 10% increase in Sol/s with v0.6 and 1080TI
|
|
|
|
------------- By the way, current 0.5 development status: | Algorithm | AMD | Nvidia | | 96/5 | In testing | In Tuning | | 144/5 | Ready | In testing | | 192/7 | Ready | In testing | | Aion | In dev | In dev | | (210/9) | (Stratum ready) | (Stratum ready) |
Awesome, very much looking forward to the Aion support  |
|
|
|
|
Those mining Aion with 1080Ti and EWBF v0.5, what OC and power settings are you using? What's the typical efficiency Sol/W?
|
|
|
|
|
