Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Thanks, I did edit my post to include an explanation a few minutes after posting the image but perhaps it had already been removed at that point. They've reinstated it now though so all good. Just to note, I've received messages that it's now been reinstated but I never received a message about the original removal. Thanks
|
|
|
Anyone working on this yet?
|
|
|
Fuserleer, thanks again for the information. Are you able to provide any more details on how Radix works? The info on your website is pretty vague but are you deliberately keeping things secretive for now? If so, do you know when you'll start giving out more details?
We're filing some patents on the tech for defensive measures and so that we can build a business model around the tech in the private space. It's taken much longer than anticipated however as we've had to fully educate the patent lawyers on the tech which is a journey unto itself. Whilst that is underway I can't say anything revealing about the tech in a public environment before the filing date as it would enable public disclosure and the patents couldn't be filed. The filing now has a hard deadline of 13th July...after which I can reveal all about the ledger / consensus tech we have developed. It's frustrating I know, but if we want to continue developing the technology for use in the public space and enable a organization/foundation to have a long term revenue stream from the private sector it was necessary. Just saw your new paper, looks very interesting
|
|
|
Hi BitMaxz, thanks for your reply. I sorted it out in the end, I think there was an option regarding spending unconfirmed BTC which solved it
|
|
|
Let's say I have a stuck low-fee TX. If the receiver signs a high-fee TX sending the as yet unconfirmed incoming BTC, would this make the initial low-fee TX more likely to be confirmed by miners because they have to confirm the first TX in order to get the high fee from the second TX?
|
|
|
Hi, I have some BTC in my Electrum wallet. All incoming TX have confirmed. I've sent one outgoing TX which is stuck due to a low (700+ sat/B) fee. I still have plenty of BTC left even once you subtract this outgoing TX. So why won't Electrum let me send any more BTC? It keeps saying "Not enough funds" or "Insufficient funds" even though I'm trying to send much less than is left in the wallet. I'm sure before I could send multiple TX at once, but it's almost as if I have to wait for the current outgoing one to confirm before I send more...? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
Hi, I have some BTC in my Electrum wallet. All incoming TX have confirmed. I've sent one outgoing TX which is stuck due to a low (700+ sat/B) fee. I still have plenty of BTC left even once you subtract this outgoing TX. So why won't Electrum let me send any more BTC? It keeps saying "Not enough funds" or "Insufficient funds" even though I'm trying to send much less than is left in the wallet. I'm sure before I could send multiple TX at once, but it's almost as if I have to wait for the current outgoing one to confirm before I send more...? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
I'm still hoping that someone's going to make a donation so that I can make another puzzle...
|
|
|
What was "Conical Frustum @ 200 10281"? I don't see where "aP" comes from.
Google "200 10281" then investigate more closely on Google Maps Satellite version is clearer.
|
|
|
But I'm curious to see the solution. Is it possible to post the solution and a brief explanations on the harder ones?
Here's the solution: 5JVAAm4A1rxDB5boKURLyfbVxNj9cVZSGdYx6AEg1VB7aP9ALSX I can explain any specific clues/characters if you like. Unfortunately I wasn't the one who solved it. I kind of gave up yesterday, after I was stuck on few questions for so long.
Hmmm... This is what I was hoping wouldn't happen. Whoever solved it needs to comment here so that everyone else can trust that I didn't take the money for myself. Without this trust nobody will donate to the next puzzle and the winner won't have a chance to win any more BTC... So it makes sense for the winner to announce it!
|
|
|
PS When I get back from work I think I'll release the solution so that everyone else can figure out where they were going wrong.
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
The puzzle has been solved and the funds withdrawn!
I assume it was solved by aleksej996 but whoever it was could they let everyone know here and possibly make a contribution to the next puzzle's address to get the ball rolling.
For everyone else, once the winner has been confirmed, could you please consider making a donation to the next puzzle so that we can continue with these? I'll try to make each puzzle fairly different from the previous one. I'll get started on it later today but won't release it until the address holds at least 0.005 BTC, preferably a little more.
Once again thanks to everyone who got involved ☺
Zeroth
|
|
|
I'll be gone for approximately 24 hours for sleep/work. If nobody's solved it by the time I'm back I may post some more hints based on any attempts or queries that people have posted. Have fun puzzling
|
|
|
I'll probably only sign a message if I ever find the answer What do you mean by this last sentence sorry? In order to prove ownership of a key in bitcoin, you can sign a message with the private key and everyone can easily verify that you own the private key to a public key (bitcoin address). Like what people are doing here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0Ah, I see what you mean. I guess that stops someone from quietly solving the puzzle and taking the funds while someone else claims to have been the winner on this forum? I had assumed they'd just sweep the address and then post the privkey on here but your way means that they don't have to give away the privkey straight away. I think it makes sense for the privkey to be available once the funds have been moved because otherwise the winner is at an advantage for the next puzzle by being the only person to know how every clue worked. I certainly need the winner to state/prove they have won on here to convince people that I'm not the one taking the funds so that people will be more likely to donate to new puzzles. I assume it's in the winner's best interests as that way the puzzling can continue and they may well win again.
|
|
|
That is why I have not yet shared my answers. I guess I will wait at least a day or two before sharing where I am. Maybe some people prefer a fresh start before the "sharing" begins. I am up to 32 sure ones, 12 doubtful and 7 no idea Okay, well I think for now I will not give any hints on specific characters, although I may amend anything I think is genuinely ambiguous. If people do post their attempts I may give general hints about something that is causing multiple problems. I'll probably only sign a message if I ever find the answer What do you mean by this last sentence sorry?
|
|
|
|