|
I would panic only if some Satoshi related wallets would suddenly start moving Bitcoin. All other cases are normal and can be anything.
|
|
|
|
US is planning to buy 1.000.000 BTC for it's strategic reserve. Other contries are accumulating as well. When the accumulation will end, I can imagine the price will be driven to 1 Million USD per Bitcoin, with a lot of printed $.
There is no official information that the US is planning to buy 1 million BTC as a reserve. This is just the idea that Senator Cynthia Lummis raised at a bitcoin conference in Nashville, in July 2024. To date, no country has officially had bitcoin reserves and is actively accumulating bitcoins. All is just rumor or is under discussion and waiting for National Assembly approval. Also, if countries plan to buy bitcoin as reserves. They will need to use sources of funds such as borrowing, issuing government bonds or selling other reserve assets to buy bitcoin. They won't print money indiscriminately just to buy bitcoins because that will cause inflation. So this is going to be a long process. Check this link, it is not just rumours and speculation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Strategic_Bitcoin_Reserve#:~:text=A%20strategic%20reserve%20is%20a,establish%20a%20strategic%20bitcoin%20reserve. |
|
|
|
|
Historically, Q4 was mostly bullish, especially in Bulls markets, we had much more greeen October and November months as we had red.
I am very optimistic, technically it looks good as well.
|
|
|
|
|
US is planning to buy 1.000.000 BTC for it's strategic reserve. Other contries are accumulating as well. When the accumulation will end, I can imagine the price will be driven to 1 Million USD per Bitcoin, with a lot of printed $.
0.1 BTC to have is very nice, I would say even 0.01 is a good amount, it will only grow.
|
|
|
|
So after about a month of waiting and pretty much giving up on my withdrawal, I checked my account today and, surprisingly, the withdrawal was processed last night and actually landed in my wallet. This morning I was confused, wondering where those sats had come from, because I honestly never thought they’d process it.
Sure, the payment finally went through after a month, but I’ve completely lost trust in this website and I’m never going back. My advice to everyone: just because you get a payout doesn’t mean the site is legit. Take your money and get out while you can.
.. what? BTC or FUN? BTC Would you care to share the hash of the transaction of your withdrawaval? The amount of your withdrawaval could also influence of the fact you got your money back. It is possible they are giving priority to small balances to try to hold their façade of legitimacy for the majority of their gamblers, while at the same time holding the money of those who have a relatively high balance on their platform. Needless to say, if a platform takes over a month to push through a transaction it should be avoided at all cost... This is a bullshit, I know almost 10 people who tried to withdraw since end of July 2025 and they didn't receive even a 1 satoshi. Right, but what would be the motivation for someone to come to this thread and lie about something like this? Even if there could be people paied by a casino to do some shilling around the internet, It would seems Freebitcoin has so many problems of liquidity and widespread issues with withdrawavals that a shilling campaign would be pretty much useless to turn their situation around. Still, I will take any news of successful withdrawavals in this thread with a grain of salt, until I see some strong evidence of people getting their money back. Simple as that. I’m not here to say the site is “back to normal” or anything like that — I’m just sharing what happened. This is for others who, like me, have been following what’s going on with this website. Personally, I’ve already moved on and stopped even checking the forum updates. By chance, I noticed a payout went through yesterday. Like everyone else, I have no clue what’s really happening behind the scenes. https://www.blockchain.com/en/btc/tx/a4415852e089faa3c06bd67cff7c37ba6c2d943ca524252c1fa04a43e46927feI have checked this transaction, it is from 21 September 2024, one year ago.  |
|
|
|
Wish me luck, I have (instant) withdrawn 0.00035656 BTC. I will report if successful
As an update, still pending. Also my FUN tokens have not been delivered for almost 2 months now. Btw, is Freebitco a registered company? Does it have a CEO, director or anyone that can be held responsible? UPDATE: still no FUN or BTC. I need 10 000 additional Rewards Points to reach 100 000. This will probably take another year with 4 WOF per day. At least you can use your WOF. I have thousands of WOF spins and when I try to use them, I get an error saying they "expired." As a result, the number of WOF spins goes up daily but even trying many times a day throughout the day all I get is the same error saying they're expired. So mine are usless other than seeing the number of them grow daily, lol They are all useless. Even if you could use the WOF, what is the point if you can't withdraw anything?  Check the heatmap, the FUN token transactions are less and less, the only transaction happened on 2 September is a spam transaction. https://etherscan.io/address/0x12d4017f232ebb4327e8e0082ed4337084bf2e84#analyticsRest in peace, our money and freebitco.in scammers. |
|
|
|
Rate cut ≠ QE... double-edged sword... not like 2021...
You are totally right with this one - rate cut is not QE? 100%. Textbook says cuts = "normal tool, " QE = "nuclear option." But the market doesn’t read textbooks. When ToolatePowell whispers "cut," degens scream "LIQUIDITY PUMP = MOON!" and dump bags into BTC. Perception > policy. Double-edged sword? Exactly. If Sept cut = "recession incoming," crypto dumps with stocks. If it = "soft landing," we get a hopium pump........ until the next CPI print. Future of crypto depends on how rate cuts are seen...
If they cut then pause (like 2019), crypto chills. If they cut then monetize debt (stealth QE via bond reinvestment), BTC moonshots... but only if it’s framed as "dollar weakness," not "recession panic." The narrative shifts daily. One hot take: "Cut = growth!" next day: "Cut = we’re fucked!" Crypto’s a mirror for Wall Street’s mood swings. My take on this - short-term: Buy the rumor (Sept cut hype), sell the news (post-FOMC dump). Long-term: If the Fed admits they’re monetizing debt ("we’ll hold bonds until 2025"), BTC becomes the only "safe" asset... if it survives the panic selloffs when the S&P cracks. You’re right,it’s not simple. But in crypto, "calculated move to prevent downturn" = " we’re printing until it breaks." |
|
|
|
FED and the dollar are a big Ponzi scheme... get rid of all fiat... convert them into hard money like Bitcoin or gold...
You’re half-right, but the "overnight hyperinflation" take is paper hands panic. You nailed here: - Ponzi? Absolutely. The Fed’s been kicking the can since 2008. Debt > $34T? Interest payments eating 20% of tax revenue? This isn’t economics it’s emergency triage.
- Tightrope walk? 100%. They’re choosing between recession (keep rates high leads to debt implodes) or stealth inflation (cut rates leads to print quietly to fund the deficit). No "soft landing" here is just picking your poison.
Where you’re WILDLY off: Hyperinflation could happen overnight... lose everything holding dollars. Nah. The U.S. isn’t Zimbabwe. Hyperinflation needs: - 0% faith in the currency (dollar’s still 65% of global reserves),
- Zero productive economy (U.S. still prints iPhones, chips, and soybeans, and dollars of course),
- Total political collapse (which ain’t happening by next Tuesday).
Reality? We get "meh-flation": 5-8% for years while the Fed slowly monetizes debt. Painful, but not "burn your cash" territory. Convert to Bitcoin or gold Gold? Sure if you want 0 yield and a 30% crash when rates actually drop (see: 2020 example, now trading at ATH). You’re right about the Ponzi. But screaming "DUMP FIAT NOW" is like yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, most people get trampled before they reach the exit. Stay paranoid, but keep your powder dry. |
|
|
|
Yo, Heard the whispers about a possible Fed rate cut in September. Will the ToolatePowell really cut the rate? Is this actually happening, or is the market just jonesing for a dopamine hit? If it does drop: Crypto: Bullish short-term (obviously), but what’s the catch? Last time cuts came with "soft landing" FUD. Is Bitcoin just a risk-on asset now, or can it dodge the recession bullet? Everyone’s screaming "MORE LIQUIDITY = MOON," but hold up-rate cuts is not equal printing presses rolling 24/7. Is this just the start of stealth QE? Or will they actually start monetizing debt again? (Looking at you, U.S. deficit.) I’m not buying the "this time is different" narrative. If they cut because the economy’s cracking, crypto might get dumped with stocks. If it’s "confidence" cuts… well, we all know how that ended in 2021. This feels like the calm before either a pump or a dump. But if the Fed flips to full money-printer mode to cover the debt ceiling circus… yeah, we’re in for chaos. What’s your opinion? Am I paranoid, or is this the setup for "QE infinity"? Or am I missing something obvious? Not financial advice. Just a degen losing sleep over Fed memos.  |
|
|
|
|
Your channel's been unilaterally closed since Aug 10 way past the 144-block timeout (24h). Funds should be already on-chain. Check:
lightning-cli listfunds | grep "e9f06610044bdc187810ee31a0f2541cd5bce94514c29183213bc0dda53d080c"
If empty, try rescan:
lightning-cli dev-rescan-outputs
|
|
|
|
It seems that I may have been prescient in my other thread, but that didn't really go anywhere. I've just learnt that Africa has implemented an alternative Internet that avoids using Google and American servers and transport. There is a possibility that South America will do the same thing. I think people are concerned about the technocrats supporting the Global elite and disadvantaging the people. At the fundamental conceptual level, Bitcoin should be able to take advantage of this. How will it do it though? Obviously it will need a different node to handle the different African protocol, but the basic ledgers should be the same on both systems. Will this node need a port for each Internet? A cross over service will lead to centralisation, and will act against the strength of Bitcoin's independence.
Africa's not running a "separate internet" it is just expanding local IXPs (270+ now vs 50 in 2020) and Afri-IX peering. Actual traffic still flows globally: 85% of African internet crosses US/EU cables. Bitcoin doesn't need protocol forks - just local node clusters (like Kenya's BitPesa Nodes running on Safaricom's fiber). Crossover risk? Zero. Bitcoin's P2P network auto-routes via Tor/I2P where needed. Real opportunity: satellite nodes (Starlink coverage hit 92% of Africa in Aug 2025, and going up ). Let's build regional node maps and not hypothetical splits. |
|
|
|
China’s gone, but US mining is MORE centralized (3 pools control 52% hash -Foundry, Marathon, Riot). Bigger blocks = higher node costs = fewer full nodes (2025 Core v25.0 data). Pruning is not equal security; bandwidth is the bottleneck (98% node saturation during peak blocks ). Ordinals reduced spam by pricing block space. Block size increase failed at NYC Summit 2025 - centralization risk > "simpler" myth. Run a node or admit you’ve never synced one and you have no idea what you are talking about.
While I generally do agree with you, I would like to see more discussions and analysis on these matter. How much is the real bandwidth consumption during maximum peak times? At what technological improvements could we consider an increase and so forth. Like a state of Bitcoin scaling yearly review, it would be quite interesting. I have nodes but on dedicated servers, where the bandwidth is not a real concern. It is different for those who run at home. Real-world peak bandwidth: 98% saturation at 1.5 Mbps upload (per Core v25.0 node logs). Why home nodes choke: Even 100 Mbps connections max out during mempool spikes (e.g. July ETF rush). Dedicated servers? Smooth. But 67% of public nodes run on home broadband (mempool.space 2025 data, hope it is accurate). Tech fix? BIP-325 (compact blocks v3) cuts bandwidth by 40% - live in Core v26.0 (Q4 2025). Let’s build a BTC Scaling Pulse report: I’ll draft metrics (node bandwidth, mempool depth, orphan rates and so on ) if you co-author. First edition by Oct 1? |
|
|
|
Dear BTC Talk Community,
⚠️ Our BTC wallet server experienced a crash and is currently resyncing.
Given the large size of the wallet and the huge number of transactions, this process usually takes some time.
We appreciate your patience while everything gets back to normal.
Best regards,
The FreeBitco.in Team
Why aren't you processing FUN withdrawals? 2 months already and the tokens didn't come and they don't appear in freebitco.in either. |
|
|
|
|
I still think that BTC didn't yet hit it's ATH for this cycle. I see it going to 150k or even 180k before the bear market. Big whales however have other plans, after making good profit with BTC they decide to move to other assets like ETH in order to get even more profits, it is a good sign for the altcoin season, if it will come this cycle as well it will be big, maybe bigger than ever, we will see.
The risk of converting BTC to other altcoins is that you may be forced out of BTC forever, in case it will only grow, leaded by different governments adoption that we are seeing.
Time will show us what the right decision was.
|
|
|
|
When SegWit was about to be implemented there was a big argument about how much of a potential bandwidth and storage increase current infrastructure could support.
The politics of on-chain scaling need a bit of context for explaining because at the time the largest bulk of bitcoin mining equipment was running from China. And China still had plenty of connectivity issues at the time.
But ever since there has been rapid improvement in terms of high speed bandwidth penetration, and China is also a pioneering country in terms of 5G coverage. Moreover bitcoin mining has largely moved to the US now for various reasons. But even for China, lack of bandwidth would no longer be a problem.
Remember, this is the reason we got 2MB SegWit instead of 4!
As of on-chain storage, pruning is an accepted form of running bitcoin now. But even for storing a full chain of a few TBs, memory prices and reliability have improved a lot over the last few years. We could easily handle an increase in block size now. The technology is here.
Some might say that an increase in block size could lead to various parties exploiting this space, similarly to ordinals.
Well... If we're going to be adding changes to bitcoin's base layer that require a soft or hard fork, along with increasing the blocksize, we might as well cut off some slack like the exploits that allowed ordinals in the first place.
Many of the proposed solutions to address bitcoin scaling require forks on the base technology. Might as well just increase the block size, or just do it alongside these changes.
In my view though, if any scaling tech needs a fork to be usable, it mostly makes sense to just increase the blocksize and see if we really need further scaling along with that, before more radical changes on the bitcoin stack.
China’s gone, but US mining is MORE centralized (3 pools control 52% hash -Foundry, Marathon, Riot). Bigger blocks = higher node costs = fewer full nodes (2025 Core v25.0 data). Pruning is not equal security; bandwidth is the bottleneck (98% node saturation during peak blocks ). Ordinals reduced spam by pricing block space. Block size increase failed at NYC Summit 2025 - centralization risk > "simpler" myth. Run a node or admit you’ve never synced one and you have no idea what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
Their website is sat behind cloudflare, so good luck with the DDOS.
Unfortunately there is little option but just to keep this thread active and warn as many others as possible, and wait it out to see how things go.
I expect there will be 1 of two outcomes: they either process peoples withdrawals eventually, or one day the site goes offline for good and that will be the end.
I bet it is the second one. Now that their FUN Address completely depleted is, I doubt that they will process any withdrawals, ever. Sadly, because I am waiting for almost 2 months already for my FUN tokens. Another end of era and an ice-cold shower for all of us. Brace yourselves. |
|
|
|
There was a guy who bought beer using Bitcoin recently in a small local bar in Boracay, Philippines. He paid 1,600 sats for one bottle using Strike App which supports Lightning. It's definitely possible to use Bitcoin for microtransactions, but it depends on the adoption of such merchants if they are willing to accept bitcoin as a primary source of payment. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1mmxr6d/paid_for_my_beer_in_bitcoin/Very nice, thank you for the example. Real adoption will help to popularize BTC into masses. |
|
|
|
show me one core dev calling it "unusable."
How about Antoine Riard as I wrote above? LN processed $2.3B in Aug 2025 (Wallet of Satoshi data)
That's the waste of resources I'm talking about. It's a gross design flaw by how LN works. More funds sitting there doesn't mean that someone is able to transact $2.3B. Instead you'd have to split your funds to however much each channel has until you exhaust it. Contrary to bitcoin, the more decentralized LN is, the harder it becomes to use. Riard paused Fedimint work (not LN! ) to focus on Bitcoin Core - his GitHub says "temporary halt". $2.3B volume = real payments (0.5 sat avg fee), not "idle funds." Liquidity auto-rebalances via circular routes - your "exhausted channels" myth died in 2024. LN’s 17k nodes > ETH’s 3 centralized L2 sequencers. Run a node or admit you’ve never used it, I can't comprehend how someone who used it at least once could still spread FUD. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
