 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Any chance FD would add MM for NMC, DVC, IXC? Over a month all those add up...
You're talking merged mining? |
|
|
|
What is going to hurt?
Three days without blocks  but we went through... spiccioli Lot of power came on recently. Good stuff, I know about 4thash I talked over from gigas pool. |
|
|
|
Sig updated, thanks spiccioli!
-Wave
Like the signature. I feel like most people assume all pool fees are 'about the same' |
|
|
|
|
I'd suggest putting "0.25% Fees!!!!!!1!one" in the title.
|
|
|
|
So the majority of the 25btc found goes to the pool?
It depends on your difficulty, but yeah generally well over 99% of the block goes to the miners on this pool. |
|
|
|
Too bad HHTT is not listed on their site as a preconfigurable pool, I wrote them back then, they promised to have a look at the issue, but never fixed it.  I'll talk to them and get it on the preconfigured pool list. |
|
|
|
But we're still missing those 1.5 TH/s.
I'd like to know: why did he leave and where has he gone.
Talked with him again this past week. He no longer controls the hashpower is my understanding. |
|
|
|
Sure!
But we're still missing those 1.5 TH/s.
I'd like to know: why did he leave and where has he gone.
I mean, we should know why people leave otherwise in a couple of difficulty jumps mining here and mining solo will mostly be the same...
spiccioli
If it's who I think it is, I might be seeing him tonight, I'll try and coax him back on the pool. Not positive it is though. People seem to be pretty fickle about jumping hash power when pools get unlucky. I don't understand it, either just split it and keep it split or don't move it. It all averages out and nobody is good at 'picking winners'. |
|
|
|
Yeah, variance is killing me. Looks like a lot of hash power has dropped off too.  Fucking ugly day today, orpahans and a good 1.5 TH/s less of suckers :/ spiccioli Bit better luck in the last 12 hours. :-) |
|
|
|
Nice grow today,
we should be past 8 TH/s if those new hashers stay with us.
spiccioli
I think I talked a couple of those guys on to the pool :-) Hope so at least. |
|
|
|
I just added about 50 Gh/s worth of Bitfury cards to my ID....
Actually flashing my Avalons tonight, I'll probably get about that much additional hash power out of them. |
|
|
|
mybe i have avalon 1 2 Batch NO'T 3 Batch I'm sorry for my English is not very good No problem on the English, thanks for being a part of the pool and for adjusting your difficulty to 2048. |
|
|
|
Great! BTW, 10 blocks in three days spiccioli Nice luck streak before the difficulty adjustment. |
|
|
|
It would make my life easier if people mining at something close to a TH/s would pick a difficulty of at least around 2048.
In general, being around a share every 5 seconds or higher would be good. This will greatly reduce the database load. I am trying to get away with using an AWS RDS small.
I just finished rewiring a bunch of stuff, flashing firmware and setting everything to 2048 later today. Anyone know who 1E8xjHavR1NwVv6tWTC6pX7Z93MWmMmPTx is? |
|
|
|
Hey Guys, introduced myself at the orig thread over here. Good to meet y'all. Ideas for growing the pool and reducing our variance? |
|
|
|
Two blocks in a few hours and a good 400 GH/s more hashing here! Welcome aboard Mr. 400 GH spiccioli Hi back. It would have been 800 GH but, instead of setting up the other half of the boxes, I went on what will probably go down in history as the most expensive date I've ever been on. (Expenses measured in opportunity cost of 24 Hours @ 400 Gigahash/Second on or about June 20th 2013) Oops. |
|
|
|
The downsides are: - the exchanges should trust each another for fiat and/or have common bank accounts, i think that this should be possible
- since that this way forces to a decentralization of the trading, existing exchanges won't have any incentive to migrate to the new platform, hence, this project (if feasible, i'm asking for your opinion about this), will probably never take off.
I'd like to address your first whole half with the question "Where is the incentive?" and this half with the same question. I'll also note that your downsides noted here are not simply something that can be assumed away. The're very real problems and they can't be dealt with by wishing them away. Even if all of these problems get solved in the manner you've proposed (which they won't there's no incentive to solve them in such a manner) and the exchanges magically trust eachother, it's not the exchanges I'm worried about. It's people with guns and in control of armies. Solve that one. Many centralized exchanges are still the crux of the issue here... centralized. I suggest you re-examine your first assertation that we can't create a decentralized exchange and work on solving the problem at that level. |
|
|
|
|
Nice, thanks for the photos!
|
|
|
|
I LoL'd at Windows Mining Machine. Sorry, know that's not helpful, but really take the time to learn the *nix ropes and you'll thank yourself later. |
|
|
|
|
