Show Posts
Now the voting does not take into account the participant's weight, a person with 100 MOON has the same value as a person with 1 million MOON.
This is illogical and wrong. Moreover, even a person who does not have a MOON can vote, which is absurd.
I think that voting should be conducted taking into account the weight of the participant. The person who invested more money in MOON has more weight. He risks big money.
It is very easy to implement, just make an MOON-address, write some minimal random amount (1-1000 MOON) and then send it to this MOON-address. This will be the verification of the voting participant.
Without this, any vote is invalid, because The voter can be without a MOON at all.
This is illogical and wrong. Moreover, even a person who does not have a MOON can vote, which is absurd.
I think that voting should be conducted taking into account the weight of the participant. The person who invested more money in MOON has more weight. He risks big money.
It is very easy to implement, just make an MOON-address, write some minimal random amount (1-1000 MOON) and then send it to this MOON-address. This will be the verification of the voting participant.
Without this, any vote is invalid, because The voter can be without a MOON at all.
I have to ask, how is it that you think that this kind of toxic oligarchic attitude won't turn off every small investor. Join our community, so you can be talked down to by people who hold more of the currency than you will ever be able to afford. Decentralized currency, controlled by those holding the most. Oh hypocracy, thy name is Nico. Everyone would be gone due to your selfish attitude, and yet you would remain cursing the darkness for not being helpful enough.
