 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
scam
they are asking just 320 USD based on nothing, not even a pdf. the white paper is just a stupid web page.
stay away.
|
|
|
|
In which order are Price Limit rules applied? Is it possible to give them a priority?
For example, if the first rules matches than CAT stops there, otherwise CAT processes the second rule and so on.
For example, I have a situation where I don't want the ping buy price to be lower than X, and also the ping buy price be higher then last pong sell price - x%. I want the first rules to have priority over the second.
Limit conditions are in OR relationship. Rule1 OR Rule2 OR Rule3...... OR is commutative, so you don't need to set a priority. I am not sure I got it. I have the following rules and CAT set the price at 0.00003933. I want it to be above 0.00004027. What I am a doing wrong?  Oh ok, now i understand. When you have ADEQUATE = TRUE and the rule is applied then new prices is set to limit value and limit routine is quit In your case your new price was set as LAST PONG SELL PRICE - 5% There's no priority, so you can try to reverse the order of the rules by delete/reinsert them in the opposite order.....actually there's no other solution that could works.... ok, thank you. I think you should add this feature asap. I think it could be very useful and not particularly difficult to code. |
|
|
|
In which order are Price Limit rules applied? Is it possible to give them a priority?
For example, if the first rules matches than CAT stops there, otherwise CAT processes the second rule and so on.
For example, I have a situation where I don't want the ping buy price to be lower than X, and also the ping buy price be higher then last pong sell price - x%. I want the first rules to have priority over the second.
Limit conditions are in OR relationship. Rule1 OR Rule2 OR Rule3...... OR is commutative, so you don't need to set a priority. I am not sure I got it. I have the following rules and CAT set the price at 0.00003933. I want it to be above 0.00004027. What I am a doing wrong? |
|
|
|
|
In which order are Price Limit rules applied? Is it possible to give them a priority?
For example, if the first rules matches than CAT stops there, otherwise CAT processes the second rule and so on.
For example, I have a situation where I don't want the ping buy price to be lower than X, and also the ping buy price be higher then last pong sell price - x%. I want the first rules to have priority over the second.
|
|
|
|
|
For those who might be interested, CAT runs beautifully on a Raspberry Pi 3.
I have had it running for a couple of days with no issues.
|
|
|
|
Hi Sanpey. A proposed feature for your ToDo list.
The combination of a Min Gain % and a Price Limit % for the next Ping seems to work fine in a pure sideways moving market, both for long and short positions. However, markets rarely move in a pure sideways direction, where all highs and lows are at aproximately the same price. It is much more frequent to have slightly higher highs and lows or slightly lower highs and lows, so that additional to the oscilation of the price there is a certain trending component in the price movement. This forces the user to constantly adjust parameters to stay in the market range because otherwise at the end you order gets outside the market with the risk of your Stop Loss rule being executed with a loss.
It would be great if you could add to the Price Limit rule generator an additional variable component, lets call it a Trending Factor, that would add (or substract) to the defined price limit % an additional % calculated by CAT based on the trending component of the price during the last ping-pong lifecycle (or the last X minutes).
Let's put an example. Let's imagine a certain market price is ranging from $100 to $110 during a number of price oscillation movements. I would set up a Ping buy order at $100 with a Min Gain of 10% (expecting to pong sell at $110) and a Price Limit rule like "Never BUY OVER Your Last PONG SELL Price - 10%" ensuring the next Ping buy would be executed again at $100 (in real world things are not that easy, but this is just an example).
Lets imagine that after a certain number of successfull cycles the price trends up and starts ranging from $105 to $115. If CAT detects such a change in price range, where both highs and lows have moved up by 5%, it could modify the Price Limit rule by adding the same amount (5%) to the % limit and the next ping buy would execute at $105 instead of $100, which would have never be executed in the new status of the market. The same applies if the market is trending down to range from $95 to $105. In this case the 5% would be substracted from the Price Limit %, so that the new ping buy would execute at $95, not at $100.
The trick is, of course, how to calculate the Trending Factor. I know exchanges do not provide long term historical price data, but all APIs have a command to retrieve the market history containing the price in the last N trades. Why not use this data to identify a trend a exploit this information? It could probably be enough to determine the maximum and minimum prices in the Market History and compare them with the values read during the last ping creation.
At the end the idea is to implement a certain self-adjusting mechanism that would enable you to stay in markets prices for a longer time.
A similar approach could be taken with the Min Gain %, where it could self-adjust to the spread between supports and resistances, but this is probably a bit more complex to implement.
I think this is what I was trying to reach with my previous question.  It would be a really nice addition. |
|
|
|
I've got a question.  I am trading on a pair with little liquidity. This means that even little orders can have large upward and downward effects on price. What happened is that after a successful buy ping-pong cycle, the price shot up suddenly and CAT did the following buy ping at a very high price. Then the price went down a lot, so I made a loss. Except than a stop loss rule, are there other ways to set CAT so that on a successful buy ping-pong, the next cycle starts only if the next buy price is lower then the previous ping buy price + %. I hope I've been clear enough. Crystal clear. Yes, you can (I would say you should) set a Price Limit to your next Ping, both as an absolute value or as a percentage. The form to create limits is very flexible, you can define whatever you need. Never Buy/Sell Under/Over your last Ping/Pong Buy/Sell +/- x%. In fact, it would be almost impossible to make a profit with CAT without setting the right price limit, unless a) the price is moving in just one direction or b) you let CAT do just one pin-pong. Btw, a Stop Loss rule only affects Pong orders, never Ping. Thats what Price Limits are for. Many thanks for your explanation. I will play a little bit with the Price Limit section. |
|
|
|
I've got a question. I am trading on a pair with little liquidity. This means that even little orders can have large upward and downward effects on price. What happened is that after a successful buy ping-pong cycle, the price shot up suddenly and CAT did the following buy ping at a very high price. Then the price went down a lot, so I made a loss. Except than a stop loss rule, are there other ways to set CAT so that on a successful buy ping-pong, the next cycle starts only if the next buy price is lower then the previous ping buy price + %. I hope I've been clear enough. |
|
|
|
I have a friend who has made some decent returns with crypto and now wants to cash out.
All the BTC he purchased was done anonymously using cash in hand.
The issue is that the government doesn't know he purchased these cryptos and he did not do clear record keeping of all his trades / profits over time.
My friends worried that if he tries to cash out into the tradition banking system (in order to purchase property) the authorities will freeze his account and seize the funds until sufficient evidence is shown proving where the $ came from.
Now my friend can just pay full capital gains % on the profits (no deductions) he withdraws into the traditional banking system, but where all the $ came from is still ambiguous.
Some $ was made trading, selling, gambling, airdrops etc etc.
What's the best course of action?
It depends on where your "friend" is tax resident. Anyway, his only option is to come clean and to declare this income to the tax authorities. One issue I can see is that part of initial funds were cash on hand. If those funds were not tax compliant, the following profit could be considered money-laundering of proceeding from crime. Your friend could be in a tricky situation. Additionally, penalties will be charged. He could end up paying much more than the nominal tax rate on capital gains. Good luck to him. |
|
|
|
Don't forget that actually I'm giving good discounts to new CAT Customers and new API PurchaseThis will continue until i'll be able to determine a new price list. BTC Price is too instable actually so i'm not able to do this  Is this still the case? |
|
|
|
|
That was my first post and is aimed to you just because I picked a random worthless ICO offer out of hundred on this forum. Yours just seemed particularly lacking any sense whatsoever, an obvious excuse to raise some easy money.
I am just shocked about how people are throwing money into these sense less ICO without ever requiring a decent business plan, detailed market strategy, detailed specification of the product. There is not even a product here! Just a few page of babbling, a product of a long night at the pub.
Personally, I am in the business of setting up companies in the UK and offshore, which requires me to deal daily with notaries, banks, and other professionals. Additionally I am a coder and linux administrator, having run a small vps provider for a while.
Your project is just worthless, as a professional in the business I do not see any real case use even in 10 years time, which means no revenue at all. Please go back to your every day life and earn some money in the hard old way.
Do you expect to be able be able to pay your salaries, other staff's, an office, running expenses in 2 years time from now only relying on revenue from your project? come on.
Anyone investing in a ICO should carry out extensive researches, and invest only where there are proven professional background and skills.
|
|
|
|
|
guys,
do you realize that you are giving money to someone who is claming to revolutionize the authentication of legal documents but has no legal background whatsoever?
Saso Vercko: an MA in Economics, profession: sales man.
Iztok Perus: assistant professor Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture.
Robert Klinc: general IT background.
Anita Zvikart: a marketer.
Additionally:
Whitepaper: my dog could have done better. A description of a vague idea. I guess if they every had to deal with notary deeds and legalization of documents.
Attitude of the team: "let get the money, then maybe we work full time on this, not just at night at the pub as we are doing now, and maybe also hire a folk who can code".
Stay well far away from these people.
|
|
|
|
|
