Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Thanks for both of you, it resolved my problem. I had 4 days without connection to miningpoolhub, had to change pool for crypto.
|
|
|
Hi Having problems with an FX8300 JCE 0.25: 19:40:05 | Thread 3 finds a Share, value 40000 19:40:05 | Rejected by the pool. 19:40:05 | Message from the pool: Low difficulty share 19:40:24 | Thread 6 finds a Share, value 40000 19:40:24 | Rejected by the pool. 19:40:24 | Message from the pool: Low difficulty share
|
|
|
OK, thanks. Enjoy your new GPU's 
|
|
|
Hi
Just finished testing 1.3.5 and I notice that the Default Pool MiningPoolHub on CryptonightV7 set me to Asia and some times to US and I live in Europe. Etash is fine, can you add a field to set location? ThanKs.
Be well
|
|
|
https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-1700xclose to my Rysen 1600, and yeah max perf is --auto -t 4 --archi ryzenHeavy is the algo where, honnestly, i beat xmrig by the lowest factor, i'm less than 1% better. on 64 bits aes. on 32 bits and non aes i obliterate it.  edit: all code done for dualshare, now entering test phase. perfs on one thread, with compared to without doublehash core2 64 bits : +5% core2 32 bits +11% ryzen 64 bits : +92% ryzen 32 bits +99% The ryzen pipelining is impressive...  I can not wait to test the new version
|
|
|
impressive score with a Vishera, close to my Ryzen ! ...
Is it possible to implement XOP instructions for this CPU (Bulldozer, Piledriver, Excavator), is there any advantage? Thanks
|
|
|
Hi Here is my FX6300 HR.  Config: -- auto -t 6 -- low
|
|
|
8 apps on 4 mobile phones  Hi Can you point me to the other app? Thanks.
|
|
|
Hi
I have been testing the 1.3.2 version and facing some problems I will wait for next version to report back.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Nice. Do you mind sharing the link of that tutorial
Besides, I have tried a bunch of RX 560 2gb BIOS and none of them can unlock more shaders beyond the existing 768 ones
Sure... Unlock the shaders - AMD Radeon RX 560D
|
|
|
Four threads ? So it's better to use 4 normal threads than 3 + dualmine ? [heart broken] If that's what you say, so it's another proof the dual mine is useless outside the very rare case of a 2M-cache dual core cpu.  Yes, indeed, he is right: 3T => 58 H/s 3T + helper => 64 H/s 4T => 70 H/s And that despite Deneb has only 6 MB L3 cache.  But I forgot the special cache architecture of AMD systems. Intel systems have inclusive caches. So the size of the L3 cache is the maximum cacheable size, because the data in L2 and L1 are just subsets of a copy. AMD systems instead have exclusive caches, where no data is ever stored in L2 and L3 at the same time. That's why you can add L2 and L3 cache size. Deneb has 4x 512 KB L2. Together with the 6 MB L3 you get 8 MB cache altogether; or room for 4 threads.  But it still can be helpful for non-AES Intel CPUs with limited L3 (Lynnfield) or for Phenom II X6 to use the last two cores, as well  Still PhenomII X6 have better performance with 6T than 5T+helper, 153 vs 141. What clock is your X4 running?
|
|
|
Dual mine forbidden with AES and Cryptonight Heavy. AES because it's always far worse than regular threads, Heavy because there's no longer smooth parts in cryptonight version Heavy, so threads have no longer any resource to share.
Dual is for non-aes, C-Night[v7], C-Light[v7], 32 or 64 bits.
I was aware of that fact, I tried because my CPU have 16 cores 8 physical 8 logical, if we use for example 4 each the flood cache happens, hash drops, so I thought if the logical shares the phisical core cache maybe it will work, was just a guess no technological knowlage.
|
|
|
Four threads ? So it's better to use 4 normal threads than 3 + dualmine ? [heart broken] If that's what you say, so it's another proof the dual mine is useless outside the very rare case of a 2M-cache dual core cpu.  I did not test dual mine on the X4 I was happy to see almost 100H/s against 45H/s before with XmRig/Stak. Keep your ❤️ warm 😁 What I tried was setting dual mine on my Ryzen as the nine thread, but it gave a error about. AES CPU found.
|
|
|
The only CPU so far where i saw a perf increase was a core2 duo Conroe (2 cores, 2M cache). Dual mining is perfect for AMD Phenom II X4. It has an L3 cache of 6 MB, so 3 cryptonight threads fit into it. But is has 4 cores, so with a normal miner, one core is without a job. Thanks to dual mining I can fill the L3 with 3 threads and add a "helper thread" to the 4th core. It looks like this: "cpu_threads_conf" : [ { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true }, { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true }, { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 2, "use_cache" : true }, { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 3, "use_cache" : true, "dual_mine_with": 2 }, ] Without dual mining the Phenom II X4 905e hashes up to 58 H/s. Thanks to dual mining on the last core, it's 64 H/s  I setup my PhenomII 955 @stock and I got 94-98H/s, startupconfig on SS. PhenomII X4 Hash
|
|
|
Good to know, I published a small tutorial how to unlock shaders on TPU but never had feedback on 550 series. About 10-11 Mh/s eth.
My locked 560D do 14.5MH/s on Eth.
|
|
|
My last thread about ETN was deleted because it violated the forum rules. So I am keeping this thread simple and according to the rules.
ETN Mobile Miner is a nice concept for the awareness of Electroneum and reached 80K + miners in a short span of time. So guys start mining ETN 😍😍
I am an IT and you should know that... You are an Information Technology? What on earth is that? Precision of language please. Anyway, you could be misinformed, ETN mobile mining is only simulated on a mobile phone. Rewards are given simply for running the app even if it doesn't really use much of your mobile phone's CPU resources. Well my colleagues have tested that and I checked their phones, they maybe claiming that they don't use much CPU resources but their phones were really hot when the app was running. Mobile phone I am talking are all the same, Samsung Galaxy A5 given by our company. I still say that people should not risk their devices for a ridiculous amount of dollars they will be receiving monthly, it simply is not worth it, they are shortening the life of their mobile when using this and any other miner. I am running on 2 Wikos and one Huawei, since last March never experienced something like that.
|
|
|
Hi
Just finish testing dualmining as you recommended, the good news, shares are accepted, the bad news hash decreased to 128 and system freezes after a couple minutes.
Gonna test 0.21 right now.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|