 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Not ready to give up on XBL yet. Some people just love doom and gloom. As a dev myself, I know these things take time. Funfair is in the news and so a lot of people are like, But what about XBL...?? They must suck because they don't have a casino yet. Well, FunFair doesn't either. Nobody has reached the finish line yet and there is no such thing as winner takes all. There will be plenty of winners in this race of gambling coins.
Keep going glue dog.
I'm Hodling.
|
|
|
|
Trying to use civic for an ICO we’re advising and haven’t been able to get in touch with anyone via the contact forms on the website.
Uh...hello mcfly! Did you all just miss this post. Guy gets on here and says he's trying to get a hold of CVC to use it for a new coin and they can't reach anyone at the CVC offices....and people on here just keep chatting away at how great Civic is and wouldn't it just be great if Twitter used it. Is there anyone home in the Civic office? How do we know CVC developers are still working? |
|
|
|
|
This coin is dead. They STILL have not updated their website since the fork. Sad. Selling all my BTCP for POWH3D. We got scammed.
|
|
|
|
|
The website hasn't been updated since just after the fork. I mean how easy is it to just update the websites with current work and development updates? The dev team has left the building. They are not even trying anymore. This is dead. Sad Sacks.
|
|
|
|
No Troll, ZCL went to 0 because it was forked over to BTCP. It was just a transfer of value. Time will tell...and when its all over, you'll still just be a troll. BTCP will go to 0 like ZCL soom aftep people will see price not go up all will sell .
Scam coin.
|
|
|
|
On a single exchange against different markets price starts from $60.82 and reaches at $67.05. It is best to wait for more exchanges to show some flexibility over the next few weeks to open trade and then can appear real value. In all this period no one can tells with surety where the price will be heading. It is all free money better hold instead of regretting later.
IT'S NOT FREE MONEY. Everyone who held Zclassic lost and now holds BTCP. It would be free money if Zclassic held its value but basically have a one for another. But I agree that holding is way better right now. It's rumored that there will be a burn of BTCP on coins not claimed and lingering in the blockchain. Is this true? If so, the value should climb and anyone who sells now would be out. |
|
|
|
|
Great to see this coin moving. I think the move to EOS is wise. I also understand the move to only decentralized exchanges. The hammer of federal regulations will drop at some point and I think there will be a mass exodus to decentralized exchanges to avoid interference.
|
|
|
|
What an amazing surprise today, although there is a lot of FUD before but now we see how big the supporters of Patientory, $50,435,100 USD 24 hours volume is so amazing, I like watching it and I think it will continue to grow, I am not selling yet, I am hoping when I wake up tomorrow we will gonna break to 10,000 sats.
Thank you for your support! The Patientory Team As someone who has worked in the healthcare industry as a developer, I know how important this project is and how much the industry needs it. You have my support 100% and I can't wait to see the future of Patientory! |
|
|
|
So... That was quite the "burn" alright. Looks like it had the opposite effect meanwhile any other coin with anything remotely good going for it has gone up.  I'm not new to the market and realize dips are normal but this is ridiculous. lol. No worries. If the price dips lower than .10 than I'm buying more. The raffle was just something to show that work was being done. The true test will be an easy to play and attractive poker game. The success of this coin hinges on a win here. There are lots of attractive poker games out there on the internet. Can the XBL team develop one that is easy to use with crypto/XBL tokens for the average crypto user? That is the question and challenge. If the game is too hard to get in to play, they will crash. If its easy to play and fun, they will be rock stars. |
|
|
|
IOTA will be a very lucrative coin in a few years time, much support will make IOTA stronger, the target for 2018 is $ 50.
50 is unlikely. That's around half of bitcoin market cap. Lets get real for a second. The days of 100x growths are behind us. It's already had that since the ICO. You are late to the party. If you want that kind of growth look for coins that are still in their early days. They way I see it, bitcoin will always hold around 50% of the market, and the rest will be divided by the other coins. Even if IOTA is a success and gets adopted, it may grow to #2, and in value maybe 2x-4x. That's still huge of course (and I'll still be in until it reaches #2), but the real fortunes have already been made. That's half of the BTC market cap at current levels. Do you think BTC is going to stay at $15k? Nope. What about when BTC is at $50k? Yeah you could see IOTA at $35 or $50 in a year. Experts like Peter Schiff said that BTC would never see $1000. You can't predict this stuff. You just have to hold on and see where the train goes and enjoy the ride. |
|
|
|
DR BLOCKCHAINSo the quote below wanted feedback on the comments left by a "Dr Blockchain" over at reddit. Here are my thoughts. I don't know who this "Dr" is but I can tell you he has the tech savvy of a rock when it comes to healthcare tech and the industry. I seriously doubt he works in healthcare at all. My name is Zachary Bauer and I have been in development since 1999. I have developed healthcare software, mobile and web applications for numerous companies including Essence Healthcare in St. Louis, MO and Med Assets in Dallas, Texas before they were acquired by Visient. Let me just address some of his concerns here. (1) Electronic Health Record (EHR) companies are clawing and screaming for new ways to protect patient data. Instead of thinking they will be resistant to blockchain technology, they're probably doing high level investigations into its use. Chances are that one of these companies may purchase PTOY and whatever developed technology they have. Healthcare companies themselves are HUNGRY for secure ways to transfer patient data. Every year, hospitals and healthcare companies are paying out MILLIONS of dollars in HIPAA fines for breached patient data. As a developer, this one issue was the biggest concern in any project. AVOID THE FINES BY PROTECTING THE DATA. As understanding of blockchain technology grows, EHR companies and patient data experts are going to run to this in hope of securing data and stopping the flow of fines their companies have to pay every year for not being up to date and insecurely storing data. (2)Blockchain tech is secure. By its very nature it prevents data leaking and fraudulent data from entering in. Industry regulations and compliance measures will be thrown out the window because they will no longer be needed. Or they can be rewritten for the blockchain. This point is just really a non-starter. Compliance measures for this industry are literally being rewritten on a weekly basis as it is now. Nothing new. (3)Potential Implementation Cost? Heck dude, this is why I think "Dr. Blockhead" doesn't know anything. Teenagers are creating coins and launching ICO's from their parents basements. I really don't see a lot of cost being associated with training office personnel or staff on this process. It's all back end. They download a program. Enter in their keys for access and they are off and running. What implementation costs is "dr blockhead" assuming will be needed? (4)Technical challenges? I'm not aware of any MIT case study. Maybe someone can post a link to that here. But I don't see a lot of challenges other than familiarity with regulators on the abilities of blockchain tech. Biggest hurdles are going to be Hipaa. Will it be a universal blockchain that the whole of healthcare uses approved by Hipaa? Or will EHR companies use there own with communication taking place between multiple chain environments? Who knows but these decisions can be decided by the bureaucrats. The important thing to remember is that the technology being developed here is solid. PTOY is one of the first in the market and its good to be on board early as an investor. (5)The good "Dr" is correct that healthcare companies are very RISK averse. This is why they are so HUNGRY for alternatives. They are scared to death of fines resulting from patient data leaks. Many of these companies are staffed and funded by people on the cutting edge themselves and will be VERY EXCITED to hear about a technology that can absolutely secure patient data and reduce fines and prevent fraud. STAFF ISSUESAs for the claims about Patientory and their staff? I have no idea. But I know the political winds in the medical industry many times lean left and a minority women led company is a jackpot when needed to deal with bureaucrats and the politically correct bozos in government agencies like HIPAA. The CEO of PTOY is black and a woman. That is gold. Time will tell but its good to be in early on this industry change, because a change is coming. Everyone in big industries in this country is exploring blockchain technology. I just talked to a Walmart executive this week (I live in Northwest Arkansas) and they are R&Ding blockchain tech big time. Blockchain technology is coming to all major industries and that includes healthcare. The healthcare companies will pay big bucks to implement a technology that will save it from hefty fines in the future. Any company that is developing blockchain use for the medical industry is a win in my book. I'm keeping an eye on all of them and PTOY is a big one. If anyone else has thoughts on Dr. Blockhead's comments, I'd love to hear them especially if you have worked in the industry. This project has resulted in a clinician strongly calling into question the reputation, claims, team and approach of PTOY on reddit under r/cryptocurrency. As someone whose family members have suffered from the medical communities failure to find a common-sense way to make our medical records seamlessly available, I am a strong advocate of change in this arena. If PTOY is the answer, I'd like its leaders to refute the claims made by the clinician dr_blockchain on that reddit. Here is a copy/paste:
Background: Recently I attended a CIO roundtable where we had participants from most midwest and east coast health systems + 1 national health system. One of the topics discussed was blockchain.
We reached a consensus that for the following reasons blockchain solutions will not be deployed at scale in the US within the foreseeable future:
(1) Incumbent major EHR companies and their strongholds in health systems' IT departments
(2) Industry regulations and lack of guidelines/compliance measures
(3) Potential implementation costs
(4) Technical challenges vis-a-vis blockchain in medical record management that are yet to be resolved! See the MIT case study!
(5) Healthcare systems are the most risk averse corporations you can find - cultural challenges
A couple major red flags about patientory(PTOY):
1-Their team is severely underequipped to handle what they claim. They lack not only the technical expertise but also the management capabilities to build meaningful senior executive relationships
2-They are outrageously overstating their "partnerships". One of the roundtable attendants knows Rick Daniels and knows for a fact that KP (Kaiser) is not pursuing any blockchain solutions at scale.
Calling out Michael Rubin (the Director of Communications for Patientory) - Patientory's claims of partnering with Kaiser bordering on fraud. I strongly recommend that you take Kaiser's logo off your website. You are misleading token holders for monetary gain.
PTOY's partnership with Kaiser is probably the pet project of a mid-level manager (director of X at a regional market) at most. Their other partnerships are basically incubators that provided them early funding to test out ideas.
3-Their "foundation"...Does anyone seriously think that a CIO would pay up $250K to become the member of an obscure entity that has no industry relevance?
Stay away. This company will be on the news like Theranos. Soon.
|
|
|
|
You must be new to Crypto. Almost every ICO goes through its initial pump and then big DUMP. This is normal. You sir, do not need to be in the crypto space. I'm buying! This is a 12 month hold for me at least. Let people sell, I'll be happy to take those coins off you for cheap.
Thanks for your agreement.
Gluedog, is it possible that you give an update on your future development plans/thoughts? I guess everyone is now a little bit confused about this weasel/fighting idea.
Thanks very much in advance.
But since we have quite a large team and many ideas, so the Fighting Game is something that we will be able to do, with no delays to our original roadmap. This should give us a tiny bit of an edge against the competition as well! It's astonishing how many people you are blatantly lying to and how many of them actually believe you... A large team? Give us a break, you are just 1-2 developers, probably working in the basement with no office at all. If you were a large team working on several projects at once, you would have revealed yourselves by now, not hiding behind the curtains. But of course since the end goal is to suck in as much money as possible from investors, it does no good to you revealing who you really are in your life. Oh and to everyone else calling me a FUD-er, take a quick look at the price now - it has crashed so hard EXACTLY like I said it would. You see now why I was selling when I did that it was almost the peak? Because I knew the price would crash down later on. Anyone with half a brain could have predicted that. So, I sold off everything and bought them back 3x cheaper and gonna sell them high again. I wasn't the only person selling off and buying cheaper that day. Many of the so called "Hodlers" did that too, because they knew the price would come down to ~ ICO price few days later. I didn't need FUD for that, it happened on its own. Yet, that day I was crucified as a FUD-er by people clearly invested in this so hard they let go of logic for a while and give in to emotions (so biased). The "future billionaire richness" has clouded all of your judgments. Anyway, let's suppose for a moment I am indeed a FUD-er and that I am doing everything I can to bash this project. Let's also suppose this whole project isn't an elaborate P&D scheme to suck in all money from investors (the way I see it this has already been happening in Cryptopia via bots that no one knows whose control they are under). Let's suppose it's real and the developers are really working hard. Then can any enlightened person explain to me why a huge team like this one is still a shadow with no names given at all? There is absolutely NO reason for a company to withhold team info especially in the crypto world, where a team and a whitepaper only receive valuations in the millions. The ONLY reason is if you are going to participate in fraud. So, here is the deal - answer to me that question with an answer that makes sense and I will leave this thread forever. I actually wanted to, but just returned to tell people here "I told you so" about my price predictions a few days ago - I was right and I was called a FUD-er. Answers that make sense also do NOT include: 1) He will reveal himself and his team after the ICO is over - gluedog's words, lies so far. 2) He will reveal himself and his team when he quits his job in real life since this is a side project for him and not sure if it ever will get traction - more lies. The project got more than enough traction (my very reason why I am writing such a long ass post right now) raised almost $200K and according to the developer and speculators here the coin will hit the moon after the games are released, meaning the coins the developer is holding will be worth hundreds of thousands or even millions later down the road. So, you are telling me with all these benefits and since the ICO went better than gluedog's expectations (guess he didn't think there were so many stupid people around), he still has not quit his job? Put yourself in his shoes. You are given a project like this one, $200K to use as funds to develop the project and you can't even make an effort to show your team because you still haven't quit your job? Is this really an answer that makes sense to each and everyone of you invested in this? It sure as hell doesn't in my book. If it does for you, then I have no doubt your account is just an alt of gluedog's, especially since most accounts posting in here are new (yeah I know including me). No investor in their right mind would never question the team's existence or ask about it, ever! The team is the first thing everyone asks, but here in this thread/ANN/project, it doesn't seem to make a difference at all. Wondering why... P.S. Let the anti-FUD wars against me continue (because I am a FUD-er for predicting what will happen to the market LMAO), but seriously answer my question above if you can!
|
|
|
|
|
Jumping in here after lurking for a while. Love this coin. I know people are speculating and impatient and the coin has fallen in price a bit. But I bought this coin for a long term HODL. I'm thinking a year out at least. 12 months! Let those who want to sell, go ahead and sell. Doesn't bother me because I will purchase more.
I'm looking forward to the new site and the poker game. I don't really even care about the raffle. But even if they delayed for a month...not worried. This is just one of many coins that I hold that I see has potential. Get the coins, hold and go on with life. Drop the emotion. Emotion will make you do stupid things...like sell.
|
|
|
|
Well I am up 400% since I bought BCC a couple months ago plus I'm earning more coins with staking. Sold off my initial investment now playing with house money. Can't complain about that.
Well this is the best or most encouraging thing I have read (I just scrolled to the most recent post) on the thread currently. As a new investor in bitconnect myself all this scam talk is scaring me! However I do take into account all that is said by other members that are inclined to skepticism and giving thier opinion. Thier points are relevant I learned and respect that. I did this on my own, I am aware if the risk right timing and all that, hence why I only invested a small amount to test it nothing to fuss over. I will honestly recommend the same approach if you consider to get involve in this or anything of this nature. Do your due-diligence prior to investing. Same rule same principle apply don't invest what you can't offered to lose. I have one question to ask anyone that can answer as of now July 15, 2017 I am not seeing bitconnect listed on coinmarketcap.com or coincap.io? If it's there it's not in the top 100 it was in the top 20 up to yesterday, does the know what's going on? Kind Regards, I'm not sure. Long time lurker here and I would really be DISAPPOINTED in CMC if they removed Bitconnect from the list. The price of the token is tanking. So I'm hoping this is just a glitch in the BCC blockchain. I'm a new investor to BCC and have made now over $300 on my investment in a short time. I have about 1800 now invested. The skeptics have no idea how this works. I've been a developer since 1999 and BCC does have a bot. Coding a bot is easy. It's simple "if/else" statements in the code. You can go online right now and find numerous bots for sale to be used for bitcoin. The cheapest one I have found was under $100. So for the haters to say there is no bot, its just insane. But that is how haters are. The banks today ALL have bots. They trade with your money every day and keep your earnings and give you a measly 12% at the end of the year. BCC gives you a sensible payout every day. And you wonder why these mutual fund managers and hedge fund managers walk away with end-of-year bonuses in the tens of millions of dollars. It's because they are keeping your daily bot earnings and compounding the interest. BCC gives you those earnings and so its no wonder why the haters are skeptical. They're so used to living in the dark that when someone opens the curtains, they scream in pain. I'm really hoping CMC is not de-listing BCC because they think its a scam. Even if they do take BCC off the market, the cat is out of the bag. People will still make money on it. Control Finance is another trading bot bitcoin company and they are making their lenders money. There will be others. Bots are the future. Get used to it and get in on it! Don't be a hater...you're just wasting time. |
|
|
|
|
