[ANN] [CVC] CIVIC Tokensale Successfully Completed

[addicto]

CVC is a great project. We don't need Binance or their CEO to acknowledge that, do we?Any reason for dump in terms of news? Just made a good buy.

It’s a great project indeed, but it had kind off lost momentum. Although they have a great (real world) usecase, they ought to attract more attention.

It just markets consolidation period, the times where many people accumulating the altcoin. The green flag is we know the project has a real-world use case and it's really useful and helpful in the cryptocurrencies spaces, and the team is really solid. So, it makes me comfortable investing CVC.

Agreed with you this project is totally different just like normal pump and dump which no use case and team putting the people on long wait and let them dreaming for good future. CVC is project of the future and this is very solid investment.

[LuckyBtc]

Currently there is no way for the general user to get Twitter verified. Can Civic implement this for general users?

It's beyond the Civic team unless twitter really wants to implement Civic for their verification purpose. which is I believe it will likely not to happen.

If Twitter were to use Civic for verification that would be a huge success for this project. May I know why you think it can't happen?

[Xantrax]

Trying to use civic for an ICO we’re advising and haven’t been able to get in touch with anyone via the contact forms on the website.

[eerygarden]

Have a question..whats your prediction on how many users will Civic have in next 3 years once adoption starts ? 100M, 200M , 500M ?

[ratoe]

let’s say Civic partners up with some major players. Do we have any info on cost of transaction for the business? Such as costs denoted in USD, or pegged to constant CVC.

[nicklello]

I have doubts about CVC as an investment asset. But I also understand that since CVC is a utility token, the price of CVC has no impact on the function or business adoption of Civic.

[Jekwizor]

Civic progress and updates, a year after an industry-leading token sale
Since we completed the Civic Token Sale in June 2017, we have made significant progress towards our vision of building a truly decentralized identity ecosystem. 
https://www.civic.com/blog/civic-progress-and-updates-a-year-after-an-industry-leading-token-sale/

[nani]

I have doubts about CVC as an investment asset. But I also understand that since CVC is a utility token, the price of CVC has no impact on the function or business adoption of Civic.

Do you think the people that held bitcoin made serious $ in that short a time frame? The people that saw the potential of BTC held for years and years, and they were properly rewarded for it. And they’re still holding, for many many more years to come.. CVC is at the very beginning of its journey.. a year is just laying the foundation of what’s to come.

[vv181]

Currently there is no way for the general user to get Twitter verified. Can Civic implement this for general users?

It's beyond the Civic team unless twitter really wants to implement Civic for their verification purpose. which is I believe it will likely not to happen.

If Twitter were to use Civic for verification that would be a huge success for this project. May I know why you think it can't happen?

Indeed it is could be useful for Twitter for verification purpose, it could help greatly reduce spammy bots. But, I don't think it could happen in the short time period.

Decentralized verification is a really great product for internet spaces in the future. The latest Facebook privacy breach is the example. But Civic really needs a time for further developments and marketing. It requires to gain a trust from the big company. Slowly but surely.

Nevertheless, it's up to the project team to overcome the spam user problem, We can't speculate too much.

[nuzzo]

Since we completed the Civic Token Sale in June 2017, we have made significant progress towards our vision of building a truly decentralized identity ecosystem. 
https://twitter.com/civickey/status/1019349026897059840

[Scooby903]

I invest in civic because I trust the team and it's a good idea. But Will there ever be plans to disclose a public number for Civic’s network size?

[vortexz]

Where do you guys get your ICO info from these days --- I want to invest in some new ICOs since although we are in a bull market there is no slowing down of new ICOs taking place.

[hzjixiang]

Bear market did lots on many alt cash, civic hasn't really acquired much in the form of positive information so I'm guessing that is why it's been strike harder. On the positive notice, it's a great chance to buy more for anybody not spent/wanting to get more! before regretting down the road CVC

[chemal]

What happened to the search engine tactics for cvc? Did I miss the news? Or is this yet to come?

[Pal Palich]

   I think the decision to use CVC as a control from Twitter could achieve a double positive goal. On the one hand, the token has undoubtedly strengthened in the strategy of crypto technologies and will certainly add to the price. On the other hand, Twitter is not an organization that likes experimentation, so the recognition of Twitter's CVC is an acceptance of the seriosity of this company's and its I's partners ' intentions. I suggest you draw your conclusions from the situation.

[chixka000]

Compared to other tokens, Civic has fallen not as much as the others. And that's good, because I invested 1 ether in it and somehow saved my money.

[nicklello]

I had question on token spending, if a website spends token for KYC verification who will be getting these tokens? Is it validators? Would they control the supply?

[lysr]

So $/CVC pairing on an exchange? That will make many people envious. And the exchange only uses CVC for KYC and Login???

[Brilliantrocket]

In the paper it is mentioned that when a service uses an attestation provided by a validator, the validator gets paid a certain amount of tokens. How is this actually enforced? If hashes are stored on a public ledger, can't services simply check for the presence of the PII hash themselves in the corresponding contract, without having to pay the validator?

[romeox6x]

if every validator can acknowledge an open up standard. Then your people can implement an 'identification pocket' against that standard. All it can would be that the stores identity info locally on an individual device. Certainly those are self-claims. Therefore the consumer can get those validated (signed) by validators through the digital signatures.