 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
that's the case and this may give you the best answer https://craft.co/cryptobridgeIt seems like bridge must comply with regulation in US or it will be shutdown like some DEX based on US just like etherdelta and etc. Idex has already applied this regulation to avoid money laundering and comply with KYC AML regulation. I have not yet completed KYC in cryptobridge and I have some bitcoins in my account and I ask you, when you have already completed all of verification and can you use all of the features? Thank you for linking that article. And to answer your question, yes, after I completed KYC all the features were available to use. I have deposited and withdrawn BTC/ETH/BAT/BCH without issue after completing KYC also. |
|
|
|
|
Do you purchase and need a second send or...
|
|
|
|
|
I completed the Crypto Bridge KYC through fractal.id awhile back because I use the exchange a lot and wanted to continue to do so. I knew that the time was coming to where I would have to complete KYC to continue to use the DEX, so I just did it early. I passed the fractal KYC and have been using Crypto Bridge regularly ever since. So from my expierence, nothing about Crypto Bridge asking their users to complete KYC was or is a scam. And by Crypto Bridge not handling the KYC procedure in any way indicated they didn't want users thinking they were harvesting users information like your asking about here. I believe they only wanted their United States customers to complete KYC for future compliance concerns, but I can't remember if that was the case or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that I think about it, I suggest Admin should banned me too. I mean, that's the only sensible thing to do here, right?! Too funny. But seriously, who wants to trade?? Still available, so hit me up!!
|
|
|
|
So I take it you're not interested  |
|
|
|
Is it just me or is the suprnova merit pool down ocminer?? Edit: the pools back up. |
|
|
|
|
This PoW Reward Switcharoo is a major deal breaker.
|
|
|
|
|
I voted for the option that they will both be used in parallel. I voted this way because first and foremost, Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general are here to stay. That's definitely happening. But because the current way Bitcoin is obtained and transacted, it is too difficult for the average person to use on a day to day basis. The masses won't adopt Bitcoin. Not gonna happen unless there are no fees involved in transacting with Bitcoin, the way BTC is obtained gets way easier, ie. no KYC/AML and that's not gonna happen anytime soon and lastly how long transactions take to confirm or post to signal completion of said transaction. There are a slue of other reasons why your average person will not accept transacting with BTC over fiat for their average everyday lives. BTC is nowhere near ready to even begin to talk about it taking over fiat currency for the average everyday user. To even consider that it is, is just flat out wrong. It may never be ready. There will be digital cash for years to come, but how will it look in the future is up to the needs of the market(s) it serves.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: mushroomjazz
BTC Address for payouts: 1Pd3otHbMaHidTctggfTkw1NrGurRyYfMi
|
|
|
|
Next improvement of Merit is on the way. POG3 coming soon. You may check the merit market now to get your hands on some cheap Merit. If you need an invite this could be yours. https://wallet.merit.me/?invite=alexisLet me know who you are in TG/Discord to accept your request. My username is Alexis and I got a bunch of invites to share with my active community. I just used the Merit Market to trade some of my mined MRT (I use the icemining pool) for BTC and I have to say that it was a seamless trade!! The trade escrow is provided by the site and I was paid my BTC exactly as it was supposed to be paid. Overall an A+ experience. Just wanted to share my trading experience with the Merit Marketplace site for other users who may be a little wary of trading on there (I know I was at first). |
|
|
|
|
I've never joined a signature campaign. I've been a lurker on BCT longer than I've been a member and that's how I like it. I'm not here for any forum rating or status. I'm here for Bitcoin, for Cryptocurrencies, for Distributed Public Ledger Technology. To learn. To ask questions. To talk about Bitcoin. I don't care if you think I write quality posts. I don't care what any one person on this forum thinks about me, my posts or what I had for lunch today. I Don't. F*cking. Care. At all. I don't live and die by this forum, but I love all the information available here from topics such as mining cryptocurrencies to ICO ANN's to random quotes that make me think or laugh.
Don't get me wrong, I love it here on BCT, but to demote members like me, who were stoked to have gotten to Junior Member status without pandering to posting rules and getting merit for what others thought about certain posts, was not cool. So not cool. I was stoked to be a Junior Member without having to stress out on whether or not some a$$hole on BCT thought my posts were quality to him or her. Now that and other simple forum abilities have been stripped from me for liking to sit back and read more than I post. Rad.
And while I can see the point for this demoting move, I don't like being on the receiving end of it. Yeah I get it, blah spam blah shitposters blah insert whatever lame reason you agree with Theymos pulling this demoting stunt here, but as I was one of the affected members who got demoted and I'm pissed. Yeah, I know, I don't care about rank, but it was cool to see that at least I wasn't some lame ass shitposting newbie punk who couldn't post more than once every 120 seconds to all the other real shitposting spam peddlers here on BCT. Now I'm back into that newbie cesspool where every dickhead on BCT assumes I'm some shitposting spammer because I'm a newbie. Back to where some elitist morons won't even take PM's from me because I'm a *gasp* newbie. Oh no, not a newbie, run for the hills Alice!! Unbelieveable amount of elitism at play here. Makes me fucking sick. Thanks for taking away my ability to post more often and do other menial tasks here on BCT Theymos, you're the man, appreciate it bud.
|
|
|
|
|
ICO Pools?? I’ve never heard about ICO Pools before your post. I just looked into them though and it seems like joining an ICO Pool will be the new craze in an already crazy ICO Scene!! Brilliant!! Thanks for sharing the information about your icopools.io website, I look forward to diving into it!!
|
|
|
|
Long term holding, and other portfolio strategies, can be a smart thing if you're properly diversified in your crypto portfolio. Diversification is pretty much the only hedge against market fluctuations where you can assert some control over them, and even then, is no proven smoking gun when it comes to the duration any asset should be held in a portfolio for. The duration a crypto asset should be held for is proportionately related to how risk averse you are as a crypto investor. Another way of putting it would be, how much risk are you willing to accept by holding a certain crypto asset for a certain duration of time?? Risk of course being defined by monetary gains and loses in the crypto asset being analyzed here. ie, how much are you willing to lose or gain?? If the answer is, I like risk, then you are a non-risk averse investor and you should hold on to whichever asset your OP is inquiring about for whatever you deem a "long time holding" a certain crypto asset is. But if the answer is, I don't like risk at all, then your a risk averse crypto investor and you should only hold the crypto asset you have in mind for whatever duration of time you deem "short" for. If the answer of how risk averse you are falls somewhere in the middle then the answer of duration is directly proportionate to how far towards one end or the other of the risk spectrum that your particular version of being risk avers falls towards. Simple really |
|
|
|
|
So this is closed according to the application sheet??
|
|
|
|
|
Do you guys still pay .1 ETH for upcoming ICO Reviews?? I don't see how to do it on your site if it is still an ongoing feature. Please advise.
|
|
|
|
I believe that bitcoin is underestimated, I do not claim that it should only grow! But I'm sure that the future is for him! crypto currency in general, and bitcoin in particular - this is digital gold, many people still do not understand this. I'm sure that in ten years it will be so.
In which sense? It's unclear what you mean exactly. In terms of value? It's already past. In terms of use? It's an entirely different thing. In terms of how it's transacted? Again, entirely different. The only comparison you can realistically draw is the use as a hedge. Bitcoin is increasingly becoming more useful for people who want to protect themselves from political instability, trade war, currency devaluation, populism... you name it. I agree with what Katherin is saying here that in terms of value, as in value in USD, which is the benchmark most people care about. Whether the comparison is actually apples to apples or apples to oranges, is not irrelevant to most people. When I talk Bitcoin to someone who I know isn't an enthusiast, but also not a hater, one of the first things I say them to get their attention and give validity to our digital friend, is this, "Did you know that Bitcoin is worth more than two or three times than a troy ounce of Gold??", to which they usually reply, "oh shit, you're right", and then I proceed to explain to them about how that fact alone should, and does, give BTC instant credibility, relevance and comparibility to anything that we give a USD value to. Of course, I'm considering all other things as equal. So the fact that BTC HAS surpassed the value of one troy ounce of Gold many times over, should answer your question OP. But, somehow, I think you still are going to be comparing apples to walnuts because if you would have done a little google searching for the value in whatever fiat currency you want to compare the value of XAU to BTC with, you'd have your answer and not ask such obviously apparent questions here. But then again, this is very subjective subject matter |
|
|
|
|
