 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Reserving Dutch translation of white paper and other documents. Not an experienced poster but very relevant professional experience. Happy to share LinkedIn in PM. Let me know if interested.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank god I went in during pre-sale for twice the amount of tokens and was able to offload everything early. Still managed to secure a small profit, guess I've been lucky.
Sorry to all the others, we have all been tricked by the team who are keeping tens of millions of tokens for themselves without disclosing that during ICO and thus proving to all of us that this is a COMPLETE SCAM
|
|
|
|
We burned all unsold tokens per previous statements.
And equivalent team designated tokens? Or are you keeping the 43 million? Team tokens are as per original allocation Unbelievable. Sold everything after seeing this post. The fact that you are keeping team tokens as per original allocation proves two things to me: a) You are sneaky, lying and proving to be a scam. People have asked this same question on this forum during ICO and you dodged the question. Now that the ICO is over and you have your funds, all of a sudden you can answer it. You know that you are significantly diluting the token value of ICO investors by not making an adjustment to team tokens but apparently you don't care. There's now 7.7m tokens held by investors and more than 30m by the team, what a complete and utter SCAM b) You don't know how to run a business. If you wanted to make money from the team tokens it would have made more sense to adjust the team token allocation to the equivalent of tokens sold, which would gain investor trust and keep the price stable. Now people are dumping it on exchanges already (no buying volume at all) and your 30m ATL tokens will be worthless in the near future |
|
|
|
|
Do you have an accurate overview of a) which partners/clients you have signed contracts with (e.g. Unilever) and b) what the content and agreements (on a high-level basis) in those contracts are? Is it just a broad partnership or have they specifically agreed to use your service?
|
|
|
|
|
When can any partnerships with real estate companies be expected? This is I think the main thing that keeps people from investing in the ICO, that at this point the idea is too far from materialising.
|
|
|
|
Ok, now it's getting absurd. I asked simple questions. Melissa tends to answer all but mines. So I ask once again. Is it possible that approx 13% of ICO money goes to 5yeartime salaries of the team? So that at the very start investors are 13% short? plus some other simple questions. And another one since I got a bit frustrated... is your plan to @#$@ us ? Hello Melissa, could you please answer my questions from Sunday?  Hello Melissa,
I've just read all the posts and the Whitepaper and I've got a few questions that i believe haven't been asked yet.
1) Do i get it right that dividends will be paid in ETH based on ETH/EUR rates at the day of payment ?
2) I quite don't understand the concept of Core Operating Budget. If all goes well and hard cap is reached you'll get approx. 60M $. You wrote in Whitepaper that because of COB, 80-90% of that sum will go to push fund. COB is etimated to be 8M $ in the next five years, that is 13,3% of hard cap.
a) does that mean that COB, which basicly is salaries of the team, will be funded in full for the next five years from the money gathered through ICO?
b) salaries in the Whitepaper are shown in ETH. Is it for illustrative purposes, or do the team get paid in ETH? If so, what when ETH increases in value 300%?
3) Are the targeted 12-20% annual returns before or after operational/maintenance/management costs and interest rates?
Best wishes,
BM
What's the problem Fahmp7? Aren't salaries for IT normally the biggest part of operational costs? So then 13.3% isn't that big a part or is it? Especially since they are planning on expanding the team immensely. The fact that their salaries are in ETH does concern me. There's no need for a developer to be earning 10x the salary of a normal developer if ETH decides to go x10. On the other hand, if ETH goes /10, it might be cause for developers to leave the company. Would love an explanation from the team for this part as well! Thing is, the salaries should be paid from the money they earn, that is from 10% of profits. If they take 13% of ICO money to pay the salaries, it means that investors loose 13% at the very start. I also asked whether 12-20% return is before or after costs. I got no answer, but 20% is insane. Here in Poland you get 6-7% after costs. So if they take 13% of ICO money, that means that it will take 2-3 years to brake even. That is absolutely ridiculous. And since Melissa doesnt answer my questions, I come to conclusion, that I'm right. They just don't want to admit it, but they know they're not playing fair. Do you know anything about business? Any startup that receives funding, for example venture capital, uses it to fund operations. Any company needs to pay its employees, where do you think that money should come from? Only mature companies are able to pay employee salaries from their revenues. Using ICO proceeds (or any type of seed capital) for salaries is literally extremely common. Get your business knowledge in check before spreading nonsense |
|
|
|
No don't buy now it just pumped for this August 24th thing. Never buy on a pump. If you want to hold this coin then wait for it to come down, which it will undoubtedly. Actually... I just took a look at their announcement - https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000497111-Binance-Coin-BNB-40% premine plus ICO. LOL! what the fuck? Anyone who buys this is a dimwit. We already have a good working decentralized exchange its called bitshares. This is just a cash grab. you'll loose money if you buy this. They are actually buying coins from the market and burning them with 20% of their profits every quarter until they've burnt 50% of supply... |
|
|
|
Nothing to add there - just another q: are you going to give us one day or a few hours notice before you decide to close the presale prematurely? So that we could still put ethers in if need be? Thx
What we meant, is which of those is a priority for you? Will try our best, unless the contract fills up & automatically stops accepting presale contributions. BTC, Ether, LTC for me Yep I'm aware, I'm closely tracking the bar on the homepage, just want to know it if you guys are closing it before the bar is full! |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to add there - just another q: are you going to give us one day or a few hours notice before you decide to close the presale prematurely? So that we could still put ethers in if need be? Thx
|
|
|
|
Concept is great, white paper is very detailed. Core team has a lot of relevant experience and impressive advisory board too. My main concern is the amount of highly apparent typos: on the website, in the team bios, in the whitepaper, etc. To me this is highly unprofessional for a serious company and a potential red flag - can imagine it has the same impression on other investors too. Would change asap
Many thanks Donberna! And welcome to the forum, i see this is your first message I just sent you an email to hire you to do a "typo hunting" bounty, because they do not seem easy to find. You are right, it does not look good, but I've seen it is a common theme among ICO's, having international teams focusing in the code instead of a perfect english grammar. The explanation is that we are not native English speakers. You know what they say: It means that we at least speak one other language I believe people will focus in the first part of your message. And from our side, we will fix it very quick. Thanks again Melissa Thanks Melissa for your quick action and good to see commitment from the team to fix things in a swift manner. Homepage looking great now, lots of confidence in this project. |
|
|
|
|
Concept is great, white paper is very detailed. Core team has a lot of relevant experience and impressive advisory board too. My main concern is the amount of highly apparent typos: on the website, in the team bios, in the whitepaper, etc. To me this is highly unprofessional for a serious company and a potential red flag - can imagine it has the same impression on other investors too. Would change asap
|
|
|
|
|
