Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 03:20:59 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: 2016/17 NBA Season on: August 13, 2017, 08:33:52 AM


Well they should care for chemistry because it brings championship. This is the foremost goal of a team owner, to be the champion and they can't achieved it without his team blending together to meet the goal. But yeah, GSW doesn't have the ceiling anymore to bring in another caliber player without sacrificing the current roster.

Chemistry can be build along the way. If on the way, the chemistry didn't turned out to what is was supposed to be then definitely that's the time we can called that there's no chemistry on that newly added players on that team.

We can't say right now that there's no chemistry once a newly player just arrived at their team. Like I said, it will be build along the way so for me I will give about 10-15 season games as a test.

Definitely agree as if you remember guys when Lebron James switch team from Cavaliers to Heat, many speculators believed that there will be no chemistry since Dwayne Wade owned the Miami Heat as this guy is the main man. But after some lots of games, we can see that their combination is kinda good and as a whole, the Miami Heat are playing great that time.

But for 10-15 games that is already too much. Maybe for me I will give 5 to 8 games.

Of course team chemistry comes with them playing games together for many games. But what worries me, just in case a caliber player such as Paul George will somewhat backfire on them. Remember the Lakers, with Shaq, Kobe, Malone and Payton and other top players? They reached the Finals only to self-destruct at the end as a result they were upset by Pistons lead by Chancey Billups. Sometimes is it good the everyone knows his place in the team because adding a new name will cause a disturbance or a problem in the end.

Attitude of each player has a huge effect on chemistry. Chemistry won't exist if all of them were veterans, if all of them doesn't have anything to sacrifice for every game they play within their team as a whole. Shaq anf Kobe were at their best and adding Malone and Payton became worst. Malone and Payton were playing for the sake of the ring which is good but they don't have enough strength since they're old in the team that is why Pistons won the championship.
2  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Do you feel shameful for being a gambler? on: August 13, 2017, 08:11:31 AM
Go guys!
In many cultures and countries is gambling consider as a bad thing which only the poorest and silliest ones do. Many gamblers try to hide that they gamble from their friends and families and feel really shameful for that. Do you consisted gambling as a bad thing? Do you feel shameful or proud for being a gambler? If it is shame what you feel what do you about it? How do you hide you're a gambler and who do you hide it from?
Let others know!

If you can't think about anything else but gambling the whole day and if coming home the first thing you do is turning on the computer to gamble as soon as possible and if after you start you can't stop until your whole balance is lost, then yes gambling is a very bad thing for you. But if you just like to relax gambling for an hour or two and you can stop any time and you don't lose big money with it then there's nothing wrong with that IMO.

I agree, gambling will be bad for you if abuse it. Business is like gambling and anything that you invest is also part of it. All of it has same goals to win or to earn money which is something that you shouldn't be ashame of because if you gamble it doesn't mean that your a broke person.
3  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Mayweather Vs McGregor: Info and prediction thread on: August 13, 2017, 07:56:50 AM
Just for fun let's bet on Connor to win this fight, does not matter if we lose, besides the odds are really good that we can get the best payout if we bet on Connor. This is a hard fight for him but who knows if there will be a lucky punch that is going to take down Mayweather, this is boxing and full of surprises here.
I am really having this odd feeling about the way people talks about getting a lucky punch,in the fight against Aldo i thought it was a lucky punch that went through when i watched it live and i was stunned because i bet a huge amount for Aldo to win and really did not understand what was happening and after watching the videos time and again,it was not a lucky punch after all,it was a perfectly timed punch,you get lucky punch when you swing for the fences and i do not see McGregor doing that,he will maintain his distance and counter and that will be his game plan in this fight too.
Lucky punch is something within anyones judgement, every athlete in the ring has a good condition on which they depend onto. There's no such thing as a lucky punch, punch is a punch even if it didn't hit someone. It's just that they have different styles and strategies which has weakness as well.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!