This site is scamming and scamming all over again! Be warned!
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin and Nutildah are accounts controlled by the same owner that both are working for sportsbet.io Most probably, their team is managing these accounts. They abuse the trust system.
|
|
|
Please check the screenshot. Both users gave me the same neg trust. Exactly the same. I think this user was not sharp and copied it again and forgot I was already tagged. Let's see how much negative trust I will get again with this post, looking forward to it! LFC_Bitcoin is alt account from nutildah Well well well, Somebody is trying to cover his traced and undo his mistake. Lucky for me I was just on time with the screenshot in my first post. Here is the new status of my account, as you can see. Suddenly LFC_Bitcoin has deleted his copied feedback But the screenshot was already there.. Oops Keep on topic, and stop using your alt accounts with answers. You made your self already ridiculous. So, give a normal explanation. You copy paste the trust from your notepad, but then realized that the previous copy paste was in your pcs memory, so the previous copy pasted information was used. You discovered that you copy pasted the wrong text(from your alt accounts negative trust already) and then deleted this neg trust. But to late, as by accident I spotted your action. You are busted so hard. You can not fool me. Your and your alt accounts all have red tagged me, do you think I care about that? The evidence is clear in my screenshots.
|
|
|
These reactions only will proof that I am right. ts are use on this page from LFC_Bitcoin. I think about 5-6 alts.
Can you clarify the bolded part above? I've no idea what you meant to say but would like to know. However, people are telling you the truth about people copying other people's feedback--it happens a lot. Just take a look at some of the negs that I left in 2017-18. I bet you a lot of them have Lauda or someone else saying the same exact thing. For clarification, the OP is upset about being caught using a bought account -
Thank you very much for pointing that out--I've tagged him accordingly. Haha, you guys are so funny. Well organized with all the alt accounts. But, to answer your issue. It happens that somebody copy the same text, it also happens that somebody then delete it again? I know you will never admit this, because you all cover his back. But I know the truth, and I will make sure this will be continued.
|
|
|
Please check the screenshot. Both users gave me the same neg trust. Exactly the same. I think this user was not sharp and copied it again and forgot I was already tagged. Let's see how much negative trust I will get again with this post, looking forward to it! LFC_Bitcoin is alt account from nutildah Well well well, Somebody is trying to cover his traced and undo his mistake. Lucky for me I was just on time with the screenshot in my first post. Here is the new status of my account, as you can see. Suddenly LFC_Bitcoin has deleted his copied feedback But the screenshot was already there.. Oops Keep on topic, and stop using your alt accounts with answers. You made your self already ridiculous. So, give a normal explanation. You copy paste the trust from your notepad, but then realized that the previous copy paste was in your pcs memory, so the previous copy pasted information was used. You discovered that you copy pasted the wrong text(from your alt accounts negative trust already) and then deleted this neg trust. But to late, as by accident I spotted your action. You are busted so hard.
|
|
|
These reactions only will proof that I am right. ts are use on this page from LFC_Bitcoin. I think about 5-6 alts.
|
|
|
HAHAHAHAHAHA And these other users also then delete their post as well? clown
|
|
|
Well well well, Somebody is trying to cover his traced and undo his mistake. Lucky for me I was just on time with the screenshot in my first post. Here is the new status of my account, as you can see. Suddenly LFC_Bitcoin has deleted his copied feedback But the screenshot was already there.. Oops
|
|
|
Please check the screenshot. Both users gave me the same neg trust. Exactly the same. I think this user was not sharp and copied it again and forgot I was already tagged. Let's see how much negative trust I will get again with this post, looking forward to it! LFC_Bitcoin is alt account from nutildah
|
|
|
Betnomi is an amateur platform, tied together with a lot of lies, manipulation and arrogance. I wouldn't advise anyone to play here. They cannot be trusted. And as for this topic, probably some people have been hired or are alt accounts from yahoo62278 because crybaby betnomi can't defend herself.
|
|
|
Ah, now things are getting clear. The same muppets now defending Betnomi are also in the service of Duelbits! To be continued. That is certainly worth investigating. I am not assuming that the owners of Betnomi and Duelbits are the same. So used a bump service.
|
|
|
Sorry but I am not buying this. You make a promise that players don't need to provide KYC when it comes to crypto, but you can't include it in the terms and conditions? Where's the logic? These are your own conditions, because you have your own permit. Then you decide that yourself. Unless it is not allowed, but if you are not allowed to include that in the terms and conditions, and therefore not legal, that also means that you cannot make such promises on the forum here. You keep giving contradictory answers.
I'm "not so kinda" sorry to interrupt here but there's just one thing I'm not getting. Why are you so deeply trying to put down betnomi for whatever they have done with their "KYC" part in their terms? If you're not satisfied with the terms, isn't it better to just leave it and move ahead to another casino on the line? Why to harass them? This is not something to be done - poking them on the same topic again and again so to keep everyone's focus on it. We've been there and playing for a while, deposited and withdrew every single penny without getting asked for KYC till now. I believe they have the right to ask for KYC when they believe it's needed, like in cases where they suspect somebody of multi-accounting. Option 1. You have been hired to defend Betnomi. Option 2. You did not follow the topic. Betnomi has made a mess of it from the start. TOS have changed a hundred times. He even just mentioned another company in his TOS in the beginning. According to Betnomi, that didn't matter at the time, he said that it was just a layout and that everyone copy and paste from each other. They are amateurs.
|
|
|
One advice: Google on "stake.com bitcointalk scam" And do the math.
|
|
|
How on earth can you rank mbet.io as B while they do not even have a valid gaming license. Is this some kind of a joke? Bookmakers without a license, should have at highest ranking D
|
|
|
Maybe a late reply, but I feel I have to warn all the players here about this website. They took a lot of money and they must be stopped.
Yes, your reply is 1 year and 4 months old late. They didn't took any money since they have provably fairness system, you can check each of your bet on stake. This case was because OP had exploited bug on stake so he was able won big money fron stake. That's what they write yes. The truth is, they don't want to pay out and make up an excuse that a "so-called" exploit has been used. Casino games from providers cannot be exploited, they are watertight. That exploit story is just complete nonsense. They had to pay and did not want to. Pure scam. I also spoke to someone where Stake.com did not pay out 220 bitcoins. This site certainly belongs to the top 3 scam on the forum.
|
|
|
Maybe a late reply, but I feel I have to warn all the players here about this website. They took a lot of money and they must be stopped.
|
|
|
Hhampuz , Shut up and go away, nobody cares about what you are saying. You are paid to make posts for them here. Please go, and stay away and stay away and crawl back into your hole.
If someone were to pay me to post (which nobody currently is) I'd argue that they very much care about what I have to say, no? You are like a toxic cesspool just jumping from thread to thread spreading your crap, let me guess you lost your ass on gambling and now you've made it your life mission to take down any and all gambling sites? You are sad, quite pathetic too. You accept money to defend sportsbooks, just like you did with Betcoin.ag. Accepting money and bribing your own to write positively about a site, who is pathetic here?
|
|
|
It is maybe complicated, but Cloudbet scammed many people for enormous amounts. I would say: just pay this customer the last deposit back and case closed. The fact that he made some other accounts is not good and complicated, but that is not a reason to confiscate the money. They can return it easily. I think that they are not even allowed to take it.
At this point I indeed would take a partial payment and I agree I did some stupid things. I appreciate the input. Thank you. I hope that cloudbet will respond again one day. Did they already pay you or what is the status?
|
|
|
Maybe the OP can update us on the mediation process, what actually goes on and what he is being asked to PROVIDE by SBR to make their non biased decision?
Unfortunately i dont have any update. As of now, i have not been asked anything ... I am also afraid that you will not get positive messages. If you hear about it, it will be that the so-called fraud has been established and that they are entitled to collect your money. Don't fall for this nonsense, you have a 100% right to get your money back at all times.
|
|
|
~Nonsense Rambling
No they’re petty predatory thieves.
Only petty thing here seems to be you being a petty loser. Holy hell! Hhampuz , Shut up and go away, nobody cares about what you are saying. You are paid to make posts for them here. Please go, and stay away and stay away and crawl back into your hole.
|
|
|
|