 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I was just wondering if it was possible for the admin of this forum to install the Tapatalk add-on onto this forum. The add-on basically allows people who have iPhones or android devices to download the Tapatalk app and browse the forum in a mobile-friendly manner? Link to Tapatalk is here: http://tapatalk.comDiscuss about this possible add-on. Do you own a mobile device? Would this be of an asset to you? |
|
|
|
Trying to get sneaky with bitp.it?  <script type="text/javascript" src="http://api.bitp.it/bitp.it.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
bitpit({clientId: "1007"});
</script>
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still advocating for bitmill for several reasons.
1. People can easily attribute BITmill to the bitcoin service.
2. It follows the pattern of BITcoins BITcent, blah blah blah.
3. A mill is a legit piece of currency within the Unites States. Gas prices have a mill price at the end of the price.
4. It flows together in a phonic manner.
|
|
|
|
|
The post that says #50 will be the winner. I'm thinking of changing the rules so that you MUST contribute at least .01 BTC in order to win the jackpot (so that there is at least an existent jackpot). What do people think of this? .01 BTC is not a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is my address:
1MjsXmLiQ9UMr35DGDevSH5C3Gx2o7hRdy
|
|
|
|
|
You simply open the Bitcoin client and it automatically begins downloading.
|
|
|
|
I am not sure why bitcoin is in an anime convention.
They're both created by Japanese people? |
|
|
|
1. I found an order under the "Sellers near me" Tab, but when I clicked on it and tried to comment on it, I get this error, presumbely from the fact that an admin blocked access.: IOError at /orders/comment/82467774/
sys.stdout access restricted by mod_wsgi
Request Method: POST
Request URL: http://zode.ubitex.org/orders/comment/82467774/
Django Version: 1.3
Exception Type: IOError
Exception Value:
sys.stdout access restricted by mod_wsgi
Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg/django/core/mail/backends/console.py in send_messages, line 26
Python Executable: /usr/bin/python
Python Version: 2.6.5
Python Path:
['/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django_socialregistration-0.4.3-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/python_openid-2.2.5-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/oauth2-1.5.170-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/googlemaps-1.0.2-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Embedly-0.2.0-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/httplib2-0.6.0-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/lib/python2.6',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/plat-linux2',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-tk',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-old',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages',
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6',
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/gtk-2.0',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages',
'/var/django/Ubitex',
'/var/django']
Server time: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:57:24 -0500 2. At first, I rated the transaction as positive, then when I pressed negative, I got this error: IntegrityError at /orders/close/82467774/
duplicate key value violates unique constraint "orders_rating_rater_id_key"
Request Method: POST
Request URL: http://zode.ubitex.org/orders/close/82467774/
Django Version: 1.3
Exception Type: IntegrityError
Exception Value:
duplicate key value violates unique constraint "orders_rating_rater_id_key"
Exception Location: /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg/django/db/backends/postgresql_psycopg2/base.py in execute, line 44
Python Executable: /usr/bin/python
Python Version: 2.6.5
Python Path:
['/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/django_socialregistration-0.4.3-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/python_openid-2.2.5-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/oauth2-1.5.170-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/googlemaps-1.0.2-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Embedly-0.2.0-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/httplib2-0.6.0-py2.6.egg',
'/usr/lib/python2.6',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/plat-linux2',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-tk',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-old',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload',
'/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages',
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6',
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/gtk-2.0',
'/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages',
'/var/django/Ubitex',
'/var/django']
Server time: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:00:01 -0500 |
|
|
|
|
1. Well, just walking through the site for the first time, I couldn't get a profile, and thus I couldn't access "My Orders." Logically, that meant that I couldn't use the "Become a Seller" page. After I submitted some numbers, I got a very ugly error that said that I didn't have an account.
Exception Type: AttributeError
Exception Value: 'AnonymousUser' object has no attribute 'get_profile'
2. Entering my email into the "Login with OpenID" does nothing. No errors were returned.
|
|
|
|
|
Bumping for more votes. We're close.
|
|
|
|
|
Several conditions will have to be in place:
1. The value of a BTC is considerably low.
2. One person has a LOT of Bitcoins.
3. The house doesn't cost a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that bitmill sounds the most natural.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll change the game so a jackpot is given out every 50 posts. On the other hand, having an apparent winner roughly 20 posts into the round makes the fight for "a winning post" a lot less random.
|
|
|
|
I just thought up of a new game that branches off this game's idea: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4755.0But instead of having a huge jackpot at a post in the far future, what if we were to have a game that gave out rewards at a much lower increment. This game will be entirely funded by generous donators! All funds can be donated to me at this address: 1PkxYmxk3Tn3MEbxNndnPr6SEKjUGSKNroYou can keep a log of the donations here: http://blockexplorer.com/address/1PkxYmxk3Tn3MEbxNndnPr6SEKjUGSKNroI will take a 5% of the jackpot for hosting the game. I will personally keep an updated log on this post itself to make sure that people know where the funds are going. Here are the rules: 1. No Double Posting 2. Posts must stick to the topic currently discussed. 3. Every 50th poster will earn the accumulated jackpot minus my 5% deduction 4. The winning poster MUST have their Bitcoin Address IN THEIR WINNING POST in order to get their winning (having the address in signature does not count). In the event that the winning post does not have the Bitcoin address in the post, then the next post that follows the winning post will earn the jackpot. 5. You do not need to donate to post and win (but you are heavily encouraged to donate Bitcoins to the jackpot). An example of the game: Person A donates 5BTC, Person B also donates 5BTC. Person A,D,E,F all post until person A eventually gets the 50th post, and person D got the 51st post. Person A forgot to put his address into his post because he was in such a rush, so the 9.5BTC jackpot go to the next person D. This cycle of donations+posting continues until the 100th post and so on... Again, this game runs entirely off donations, so in the event that no donations occur between now and the 50th post, the 50th poster gets nothing. This game is primarily here to encourage people to sign up for these forums and to join and engage with the community. The first topic that posters should respond to is a series of questions that will further structure the game. First question: Should there be a limit for the jackpot? If so, what should it be? (For this game, anything donated past the upper limit will go towards the next jackpot, so there is an "emergency fund" set up for the next jackpot). Second question: Is 200 posts too much, not enough, or just right? If any major consensus occurs with any of these questions then I will change the game rules. Donation Log: | Donator | Bitcoin Address | Amount | Donated for the Jackpot at post... | | Donator | Bitcoin Address | Amount | Donated for the Jackpot at post... |
|
|
|
|
|
I think that the best way to give .001 bitcoins a name is to call it a bitmill. People say abbreviate bitcoin as BTC, so similarly, a bitmill will be abbreviated as BTM.
One dime could be .1 BTC
but .09 bitcoins could be called 90 BTM or .09 BTC.
In a summery, people should name things as bitcoins or bitmills, no bitcents (since BTC could stand for bitcoin or bitcent). Bitmills could be abbreviated as BTM.
|
|
|
|
|
Money doesn't grow on trees,...
it is earned from the deep confines of a system that solves encrypted blocks.
but apples do.
but you sure can mine it!
I'll edit my post when I can think of more.
|
|
|
|
|
Just wondering, did all three of my accounts go through? If only two went through, then I can accept that payment.
|
|
|
|
|
Hm...I'll check this out. I'll be fixed in a few minutes.
Edit: Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
