Hi
I'm the founder of, and one of the developers on the
ELTCOIN project.
Having read this reply, I was dubious about posting - debating weather or not it's worth replying to you here, only to bump this FUD thread by my man @ansi, up the page on BCT.
Obviously, I've decided to respond, as I can't in all good conscience allow your misinformed views to besmirch our Community's project, without at least an adequate rebuttal.
In response to your points:
It seems most people don't know the total incompetence of your so-called team of developers
So let me take a minute to tell people what really happened.
They were originally ELTC, found them in Telegram but they didn't have a BCT thread and the cloners jumped them and beat them to their game, that's all the ELTC, ELTC2, ELTC3 bullshit you see in ED.
They rebranded to ELTCoin (notice the case) and started their airdrop, they sent a ton of coins, wasted lots of ETH on gas before they realized their contract was flawed. Their so-called developers forgot 2 major functions needed for the contract to work properly and hence couldn't get their token on to ED. See response from ED rep:
As an aside, devoid of any argument - this is a very derogatory way to speak about a team who you seem to have underestimated somewhat.
Good thing we've got thick skins, eh?
First part, you're right -
We were originally eLTC. And yes, the clones did beat us to to making a BCT thread.We don't tend to use bitcoin talk much as the forum feels very clunky, and antiquated (to say the least).
We did rebrand to ELTCoin, and started our AIRDROP, and yes - our contract only implemented ERC20 Basic so it was 'flawed' from the perspective of listing on an exchange or using the full ERC20 API.
This was indeed a mistake, and one which I wish we could have fixed without the need to redeploy the contract, but that as you may or may not know, is (almost) impossible.
Their next brilliant move was to rebrand as ELTCOIN. Apparently, they thought they could capitalize the name and that would fix everything. They started dropping these coins to all the recipients of the original airdrop and everyone noticed that they now have 2 different ELTCOINs from 2 different contracts:
But guess what, these idiots never fixed the contract and the new ELTCOIN can't get listed on ED either. So since they aren't really developers and don't know how to fix the problem they decided to have an ICO because hey they got to find a way to get some $ out of this.
Here's where we disagree (and the facts are on our side).
We capitalised the name of our token to distinguish it from the old and unexchangable ELTCoin, however I'm left wondering how it is that you could make such an assertion as;
"these idiots never fixed the contract and the new ELTCOIN can't get listed on ED either" without actually bothering to check the source code for the ELTCOIN contract.
Perhaps you're not knowledgable enough with ethereum or solidity, or perhaps you are are deliberately lying to the good people who frequent this forum in order to spread baseless FUD.
I can only speculate as to which.
Either way, I shall take the time to explain and educate you as to how you're wrong in this regard.
Here's our source code, incase you were unable find it somehow:https://github.com/ELTCOIN/smart_contracts/blob/master/contracts/ELTCoin.solhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x44197a4c44d6a059297caf6be4f7e172bd56caaf#codeIf you take the time to check our contract source (about 2 mins on etherscan) you can easily see the full implementation of both the functions you've claimed we didn't include.
Here's a snippet showing transferFrom()function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
require(_to != address(0));
uint256 _allowance = allowed[_from][msg.sender];
// Check is not needed because sub(_allowance, _value) will already throw if this condition is not met
// require (_value <= _allowance);
balances[_from] = balances[_from].sub(_value);
balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_value);
allowed[_from][msg.sender] = _allowance.sub(_value);
Transfer(_from, _to, _value);
return true;
}
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public returns (bool) {
require(isPreSaleReady);
allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
return true;
}
As you can plainly see from the snippets posted above (verifiable on both etherscan.io and our github repo 'smart_contracts'), we have of course fixed the issue which caused us to have to redeploy in the first place.
Why would we bother rebranding, redeploying etc if we weren't going to
fix the issue? 😂
They have had several BCT threads but they delete them and start new ones when they get called out on their shit.
We have not deleted our threads on BCT - they have been removed twice now by BCT mods.
I can only assume due to the intense hated in the form of FUD people like my boy @ansi posts on the regular.
They banned a shit ton of people from Telegram for calling them out on their bullshit.
Nope, as many of the 2500+ people in our telegram community can attest, we welcome and engage with genuine questions and critiques of the project.
In fact debating with such people has led to our growth as a community and team.
We've learned a lot from such passionate and engaged community members, we are very open to new ideas.
We often hold polls to see how people respond to various ideas we might have for the future of ELTCOIN.
Those who have been banned are either blatant FUD trolls, spammers or have been banned by the Butler for whatever reason. (rules)They have some shit called the MoonGang and in their Trello have a card titled "buy Lambos with ELTCOIN". Seriously, you're dealing with 13 year old kids at best.
I can see you've never heard of ICO Moon Gang, an independent ICO review team, but that is likely irrelevant.
We do have a card called "Buy Lambos with ELTCOIN 🏎" on our Trello. Perhaps you think this is some kind of joke?
We're not joking.Some team members involved with the ELTCOIN project, are also involved with
https://moonlambos.io, which seeks to be the premier destination for luxury goods in the cryptocurrency space.
moonlambos.io - when the showroom opens, plans to accept ELTCOIN as a currency. This is the reason for the Trello card.
Most people in our community know this fact, as we're often posting the stickers in our various telegram groups.
Truthfully, the naming and positioning of moonlambos is deliberately a tongue in cheek name for a serious crypto startup with a youthful streak.
Perhaps you have misinterpreted our sense of humour?Don't give them your ETH. If you want worthless ELTCOINs that you can't trade anywhere I have 100,000 of them, reply with your ETH address and I'll gladly send them to you so I don't have to see this shit in my wallet anymore...
Seems like you really don't want people to have any ELTCOIN, yet somehow you have accumulated 100k... strange, as the AIRDROPs were only ever 10k per address... 🤔
If you are really serious about the offer you just made then I invite you to instead of giving them away, burn them?Send your ELTCOIN to
0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000F
and reply to this thread with the tx hash, if you're serious.
This way you'll be increasing the value of ELTCOIN for the OG HODLRs once it hits the exchanges.
If you have any further questions or critiques of our community's project, please do not hesitate to jump into our telegram chat, as we're able to be much more responsive there, you could reply to this thread or PM me - but I like I said, I don't tend to use BCT that much.
Kind regards-
Oli, ELTCOIN Team, et al
P.S:
ELTCOIN team will be posting a new BCT thread soon, hopefully it doesn't get removed like the last ones.
We'll be showcasing our new iOS Wallet app, PoS integration, updates on our roadmap, and a couple of other exciting projects we're very excited to share with you all. 
Show Posts
