Just traded 5 BTCs -> moneybookers USD

reliable as the previous times

Had been a little astray from this thread lately

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5441.msg1413156#msg1413156
"December 21, 2012, 08:53:16 AM"

Maybe it occured before, but the consequences of it on bitmarket.eu started on december.

Anyway, since my coins were sent on february 2013, they shouldnt have been afected by this (bitcoinica). But just found out that I was f*cked up in the last hack

Looking at the address where they were sent, seems like they were totally lost, being tranfered through a lot of wallets in massive amounts (200, 500, 1000, even 2000 btcs at once!).

yay, i'm not a newbie anymore

I traded him for:

2.5 BTCs for Moneybookers dollars on (23/02/2013)
7.48 BTCs for moneybookers dollars today (05/03/2013)

Both times he sent the payment promptly after the BTCs got confirmed and received them without any trouble in my moneybooker account.

Completely recommended 

If I understand correctly, this bitcoinica issue occured at december 2012.

I naively deposited 2.43 BTCs on bitmarket and sold them without problem (14/02/2013). Then I deposited 5 more BTCs and put them on sale (on 15/02/2013). Then The site got offline 16/02/2013 and has been offline since then.

This bitcoins were transfered after the issue with bitcoinica, so the admin should have complete access to them.

Is there any way to get in contact with him? The site is offline without contact info. Would be enough to send a PM to his user in this forum or he just got completely off this issue am I simply screwed?

(sorry for the bad english btw).

completely agree, but those are the forum rules, so we have to just deal eith them . _ .

I had some bitcoins from back when they was 8 USD worth (after the bubble). I just sold all my BTCs.

If it keep raising, I ahve already won money, and if they fall again, I'll reinvest in BTCs and wait.

I got that mail too, I dont believe it :p

i prefer to OC core and UC memory on my own

I have a:

5850 -> 900/300
5770 vapor-X -> 960/300
5770 Hawk -> 1065/300

and use guiminer with phoenix and phtalk

addresses are generated randomly, he expose the posibility of addresses colliding (a bitcoin client create a wallet that is already in use) so that wallet would update the transactions in that address and if it has some BC inside, they can be spent, spent = stolen.

I read some time ago that due to the lenght of the addresses is "almost" impossible, better said, very improbable, but not impossible.

It would be nice to kinow if there's a kind of system that avoid creating an address that is already in use.

I dont find it very hard to occur, after all the possibility of solving a block is very small, but is completely possible.

That's actually smart

For this, all the work goes to the core, so running the memory only generate more heat and more power conumption.

The optimal is overclock the core as much as you can and downclock the memory as much as you can.