Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Bumping this thread for some updated exposure. no offense, but you created that thread a year ago and you disappeared, what did you do during that year that you disappeared? Is strange that these guys: Name: Skyrah2008_2Posts: 11 Activity: 11 Merit: 7 Position: Newbie Date Registered: February 03, 2019, 03:36:49 PM Last Active: April 20, 2019, 10:58:39 AMName: bigicxxlPosts: 3 Activity: 3 Merit: 0 Position: Newbie Date Registered: October 25, 2018, 10:10:22 PM Last Active: May 11, 2019, 08:44:33 PMalso disappeared last year Non taken. I worked, refined skills and practiced trading. I do not know why or how this coincides.
|
|
|
Bumping this thread for some updated exposure.
|
|
|
Selling BitMex Trading Signals. Closed Telegram group open to 5 invites. Cost: 0.25 BTC per 3 months and 0.9 BTC per year. PM me for a 2 week trial if you're interested.
First come, first served.
This was also a trial for myself. I closed down the group after finding some issues with how to deliver the signals. I'm now reopening this group called ''suckersignals'' and I will deliver signals for free for the upcoming undisclosed time. Will do this as a learning experience for myself and others enjoying the signals. PM me for a telegram link to the group.
Going with the platform of Binance for the variety of coins. Coins analyzed are futures traded.
|
|
|
Is anyone offset by ICOs raising ridiculous amounts as high as 50-100 million or even more? I seriously think these types of ICOs are ruining this space. They can never justify why they need such large capital. They always present you a pie chart, X% goes here and Y% goes there. But when you ask them; ''Why do you need 50 Million for this?'' They Always refer to the whitepaper which tells you nothing but the exact same pie chart of % allocation, in the end you never get a straight answer, just loops of being refered to this or that. Often these types of ICOs have their own salaries worked into these pie chart disguised under words like ''Operation costs'', ''Development Costs'' but ask them how much they are paying their developers, how much goes to the CEO and you never get a straight answer. In early 2017 it was a milestone to get to a 100Million marketcap, right now it seems like a Billion is the new 100Million. How is this possible? How is it possible that in early 2017 100Million $ was a milestone and now you have projects raising a 100$ million? For what exactly? Their whitepapers look like brochures, their advertisements are completely screwed only made to lure in dumb people to give them their money. These people are laughing their socks off raising capital that some of the most succesfull companies in the world took decades to raise.
Now you can ''invest'' in what you want and what you like but I just want to say that I'm sick to my stomach with these ICOs, and that raising such amounts of capital in 1-2 months isn't healthy and the return isn't great either, also most of these ICOs do private deals with big money that get tokens 10x as cheap as you do. The youtubers promoting ICOs are all getting paid big time by these companies to shill their shit idea's and brochures. They won't admit it but the youtubers that do admit they get offers and ironically are also the ones that don't shill ICOs admit dare to say with 100% guarrantee that every youtuber is getting these offers. People like BoxMining, DataDash and Suppoman are all paid heavily to lure your ass into buying shitcoins. There's no liability or fudiciary responsibility for these ICOs to deliver what they promise, even if they deliver its half-baked and not up to standards.
For example, Genesis Vision raised aprox $2 Million dollars for an exchange. CoinMetro is raising (or has raised) 50 Million dollars. Now why does GVT need 2 Million and CoinMetro 50 Million? Why did Ethereum raise 18 Million, Stratis under 5 Million? And why do blockchain projects today need 5-10x the capital that was needed back then? You are all feeding the pockets of people and companies that have no business launching an ICO. The trend is pretty Obvious, some of the most succesfull ICOs raised capital that doesn't even come close as to what projects are asking for today. And with good reason, these ICOs don't think of you as an investor, they see you as a customer, legally (by some nations) you are not investing, you are a customer when it comes to these ICOs. And their advertisement campgains, whitepapers and lack of depth of explaining the technicalities of what makes them better, faster and the raising capital only re-affirms this. You are just being marketed to and with all good marketing their is a big dose of manipulation going on, they are just trying to find the most effective ways for you to easily ''invest'' in their shitcoins.
I know that a lot of people here including myself don't have a Venture Capitalist background, that most people are just looking at the past and want a piece of all the insane % growth some of these projects have seen. But I will warn you, you won't get a 50x return on an ICO raising 100Million, likely you will be scammed and that project will flop because they were cheating people from get-go. They didn't need 50 million or a 100 million, they were stuffing it in their own pockets and they don't even know what a blockchain is, they don't know what decentralisation means.
I honestly hope people read this and will say no to 50-100 Million dollar ICOs that have their own ERC20 token (I could cry). You are being cheated and they are ruining this space. If this keeps going like this I can guarrantee you that people are going to get burned big time, this isn't healthy and this can't be kept up forever. At some point this will come crumbling down upon the people that are purchasing into this overpriced garbage and it can mean financial ruin.
|
|
|
I need a wordpress designer for a website i'm building. Please pm me if you are interested so we can discuss the details.
|
|
|
I was checking out BlockNet and it seems like a monster project, not only the DEX but apparantly they will also have Blockchain interopability. Basically means that different blockchains can communicate, such as healthcare and insurance for example. Seems like they're covering a vital step in the use of blockchain which is the ability for communication and exchange between all these different chains and ecosystems. Plus the fact that you don't have to convert to BTC anymore. Current marketcap is quite low for the mainstream capacity it has, as we're seeing more and more companies starting to use blockchain this is going to become an essential tool for the huge industry that is flourishing here. To me it seems like this project isn't really getting the attention it deserves. I bought some BLOCK and would like to know what you guys think, what's 2018 going to bring for BlockNet? I think we could seriously see another project reaching into that billion(s) dollar marketcap. http://blocknet.co/Check out their website and scroll down to see a summary of features BLOCKNET offers.
|
|
|
BlockNet is a pretty cool project, but I'd like to see where it goes. I think there's a market for it but to say its going to kill other Exchanges seems a bit overestimated. I think China and USA could really use a DEX though, Waves DEX is coming a long but its far from use able for daytrading.
But yeah, pricewise and marketcap it has a long way to go, could become a top5 project (gtfo BTG)
|
|
|
I hear a lot of bad things surrounding IOTA though, that they locked wallets, that the devs scold other projects and that the thing is centralized.
but 2000x seriously? Lucky people that got into that ICO (assuming they hold and didn't sell) I think its a bit overpriced honestly, I like byteballs more.
|
|
|
Hello,
I am building a website and I am wondering how feasible it is to launch an ICO so I can get a professional developer, designer to work on it and market it. I am looking to raise an amount between $10,000 and $50,000 dollars. The investors would get tokens that preserve the right of dividends on quarterly revenues of the website. I don't want to do stuff like kickstarter because I won't have physical products to sell or give away. Instead i'm looking for some investors that would be interested in kickstarting the project but when I look at all the ICOs its all multimillion projects and wonder if there would be any actuall interest in a project of such small size? Not to say it can't be lucrative for investors but given the fast paced economy of cryptocurrencies and most investors looking for an instant ROI upon exchange launch is it manageable to do this? Also do you think it is a good idea, launching an ICO for such a project? On the upside it is a small amount of money directed at pure development and marketing, I won't be taking any salary out of it and in a best case scenario, besides a little reserve fund for unforseen costs, put the money back into the dividend pool. If I conduct the ICO it will be on Waves platform as I find this one most suited and has a DEX so that investors can trade the tokens if they like, I won't be planning to hit more exchanges though as this is very costly and not really what the project is about. I assume though that with being listed on CMC and exposure there will be people interested in trading the tokens on the Waves DEX.
Is this a feasible idea or should I look for other methods to raise funds?
Sincerely, LotusPetal
|
|
|
Hello,
I am building a startup website and I am wondering how feasible it is to launch an ICO so I can get a professional developer, designer to work on it and market it. I am looking to raise an amount between $10,000 and $50,000 dollars. The investors would get tokens that preserve the right of dividends on quarterly revenues of the website. I don't want to do stuff like kickstarter because I won't have physical products to sell or give away. Instead i'm looking for some investors that would be interested in kickstarting the project but when I look at all the ICOs its all multimillion projects and wonder if there would be any actuall interest in a project of such small size? Not to say it can't be lucrative for investors but given the fast paced economy of cryptocurrencies and most investors looking for an instant ROI upon exchange launch is it manageable to do this? Also do you think it is a good idea, launching an ICO for such a project? On the upside it is a small amount of money directed at pure development and marketing, I won't be taking any salary out of it and in a best case scenario, besides a little reserve fund for unforseen costs, put the money back into the dividend pool. If I conduct the ICO it will be on Waves platform as I find this one most suited and has a DEX so that investors can trade the tokens if they like, I won't be planning to hit more exchanges though as this is very costly and not really what the project is about. I assume though that with being listed on CMC and exposure there will be people interested in trading the tokens on the Waves DEX.
Is this a feasible idea or should I look for other methods to raise funds?
Sincerely, LotusPetal
|
|
|
recently i saw an airdrop about Penis coin and suddenly when i check etherdelta i saw 80081.350 PNS coin on it. Then i check my mew if it is legit or a bug then i saw it there but the other custom tokens that i add was gone. Do you think this is a hack?
Depends, MEW doesn't show tokens you have no balance on when loading tokens. I doubt you got hacked unless you clicked some fishy link... Your post is a bit vague try formulating it in a different/better manner.
|
|
|
So, if Bitcoin really takes off, we think we have an honest, state-free money. No central bank, or anyone, can create bitcoins past the 21 million limit.
Correct? In practice, no.
What Western central banks are doing now is getting us used to the idea of multiple cryptocurrencies being viable. When they use their printed money to buy some new cryptos, their values go up.
One simple example of how they can continue to expand their money supply is to have a basket of cryptos against which they 'manage' exchange rates with dollars, euro, etc. Say, at first this basket contains 1 BTC, 10 ETH, and 100 LTC, and the Fed and US government have an official or unofficial policy of keeping this basket at the price of $100K, with a combination of keeping money printing and public debt under control, and selling the BTC/ETH/LTC in its vaults to scare savers away from moving their dollars into coins.
As time goes on, the Fed will want to create more dollars. (As it always has.) Then they will buy up lots of new cryptocurrency XYZ (cheap) with their dollars, and raise the price of XYZ. After XYZ has 'proven itself in the market with its technical superiority,' the Fed will add it to the basket, and the new basket will be priced at $120K. Since the 'base money' has expanded by 20%, the number of dollars can also be expanded by 20%.
This is only one of many variations. The Fed doesn't even have to declare a basket (as mentioned above.) Whatever it buys will rise in value, and will become part of the 'basket'. Whatever it abandons will die out. It will have all the power.
The system will be no different from the early days of gold and silver standards, but with a new twist: there are an unlimited number of new gold and silver mines, and only central banks know where they are!
So, I'm still thinking that gold and silver, whose scarcity is secured by physics, rather than computer code, are the superior forms of money for improving our freedom from governments and bankers.
Gold, Silver and other valued metals will always have a place but there are reasons why we stopped using those forms as payment. It's very uncomfortable to go to the grocery store with those metals. The chance of being robbed and losing allot of money is very high. Getting payed in these metals only risks being robbed of your entire paycheck whilst driving/cycling/waking home. The metals are very heavy. Maybe the invention of teleportation will revolutionze the monetary system in the future as blockchain is doing now? You could directly teleport paychecks, valueable metals etc! Or maybe at some point we will just outgrow this childish thing called money and think of something better.
|
|
|
I like waves more as ethereum, I can see it have some good growth potential but not sure if it will become as big as ethereum for now.
Waves might be able to take on Ethereum in the very long run. Just waiting for december to see what happens with the pricing of waves its bottom price has gone up by almost 2x and it seems to be waiting for a growth spurt. Right into its puberty, if its nurtured properly it will see adolesence with a healthy pricing and steady growth.
|
|
|
I'd say a lack of education and corruption. A self centered view of the world creates wealth for few and leaves many behind. I think its also something historicall as many countries have been exploited and have often been left alone to repair the damages themselves which they were not able to handle.
|
|
|
Hello. Why does a coin EOS not trade on such large exchanges as Poloniex and Bittrex? This coin has a large capitalization. I understand that ICO is stretched for a year and, perhaps, because of this, these exchanges do not want to be added to themselves? And recently she fell into the very bottom. I think that until the new year its price does not increase significantly. Your opinion?
My opinion is that the price of EOS will keep declining untill the end of the ICO. Also I don't get the idea of why to have a yearlong ICO. Aswell as that I'd like to see some kind of a prototype before investing in anything these days.
|
|
|
Humans may have totally over taken the planet earth but that doesn't means that we are the owners of this planet. Being the most intelligent species comes with responsibilities. We have urbanized this planet. n other words we have destroyed the home of many species. Biodiversity is way more important for our survival than we realize. We should let other live if not for them but ourselves.
Humans should be more wise in how they treat the planet and all the species inhabiting it. We have indeed destroyed the home of many species, but these destructive tendencies are in our nature. Earth, how much as we mistreat it will do fine and humans can't last forever on this sphere. I think in the future we will learn and focus more on how to live in harmony, we have been in a survival mode for very long and we are slowly moving away from a survival mode into a more harmonious way of living. Accumulation, money, idea-ology's; they aren't satisfying.
|
|
|
|