These are unfair and incorrect views of the Keynesian economics.

Keynes pioneered the study of the economy as an aggregate. It also introduces the idea of disequilibrium and price stickiness, which are occurring themes if you conduct any serious macroeconomic analysis. He also introduced behavioral elements in his formal analysis e.g. money demand equation and term "Animal Spirit". He would have incorporated expectation but the mathematics at his time was not advanced enough to handle that.

The policy prescriptions from Keynes's theory are natural implications of his theory, which remains revolutionary even to this day. The great depression in the late 20s dealt a huge blow to the Austrian school as well as western capitalism in general. It beckoned a response outside the box and Keynes' demand management really was the answer until the 70s. You have to remember that even liberals in the west placed a lot of hope on Communism during the great depression, the vibe was certainly very different from now.

While it is unfortunate that Keynesian economic theories have been politicized to benefit the state power, it is also nature that for a long period of human history big states and institutions exist. The Austrian school was too ahead in its time and the technology was not there until more than a hundred years later. The free market is still an imperfect institution (as correctly realized by Keynes) that is not really free and transparent, central authority is needed to enforce property rights.

So contrary to what you have said, it is Keynesian economics that was radical to the traditional Austrian school. Hell, it is even radical in this day as the neo-liberalism (a politicized descendant of the Austrian School) took over the world from the 90s that led to the tremendous growth of wealth and income inequality.

The Great Depression was predicted by several Austrian economists:

In Austria, economist Ludwig von Mises saw the problem developing in its early stages and predicted to his colleagues in 1924 that the large Austrian bank, Creditanstalt, would eventually crash. He wrote a full analysis of Irving Fisher’s monetary views, published in 1928, where he targeted Fisher’s reliance on price indexes as a key vulnerability that would bring about the Great Depression, concluding: "because of the imperfection of the index number, these calculations would necessarily lead in time to errors of very considerable proportions."[2]
F. A. Hayek published several articles in early 1929 in which he predicted the collapse of the American boom.[citation needed] Felix Somary, who like Mises was a student at the University of Vienna, issued several dire warnings in the late 1920s.[citation needed][3]
In America economists Benjamin Anderson and E.C. Harwood also warned that the Federal Reserve policies would cause a crisis, and like Somary, they were largely ignored.[3] Albert H. Wiggin summed up in 1931 that the "depression has been prolonged and not alleviated by delay in making necessary readjustments."[4]

So you mean the Keynesian economics is not exactly as what they said because they're under control of the goverment?

People just greed. They are used to complain that their government is corrupted (doesn't actually matter where you live). And at the same time they just don't pay any attention to the services they get in turn (police, medicine, transport, roads other infrustructure)

Пока не урегулируют на законодательном уровне - невозможно спокойно принимать биткоин в качестве оплаты. О чём они по телеку и говорят в принципе.

Действительно ли так необходима децентрализация для криптовалюты?

Можно же просто поднять анонимный Tor сервис и обслуживать все транзакции как на обычном веб сервере. Все плюшки налицо - анонимность, независимость от правительств итп. Еще и в придачу скорость работы, никакой блокчейн не сравнится.

Не превратилось ли слово "децентрализация" в своего рода мантру? Ведь многие криптовалюты вообще никогда  не были децентрализованными и это не мешает им быть в топ 50.

Или я чего-то не понимаю?

Keynesian economics is a horrible system, but so far it works the best until we have another implemented

Apart from imported cars, the overall prices for stuff seems reasonable in Russia, when compared to those in India. But still, I am not sure as I have never been to that country. But this 13% tax rate is too good to be true. And the biggest irony is that tax evasion is still widespread in Russia, despite the tax rates remaining this much lower.

OK. But exactly how much is "too much"?

Tax rates vary from country to country. And in certain countries, the indirect taxes are even more than the direct taxes. Here in India, the highest slab of income tax is around 33%. However, on top of that we are paying indirect taxes in the form of Goods and Services Tax (GST), which can range anywhere from 5% to 28%. The tax rates are much higher, when compared to countries such as Russia, which is having a flat income tax rate of just 13%. Even the personal income tax rate in Ukraine stands at 18 percent. Compared to that, the rate in India is too high.

Because the citizens of this certain country does not trust the government. They think that the taxes that the government is getring are just going to the officials own pocket and not for the sake and projects of the country.

Когда читаешь пост то сразу возникают закономерные вопросы - если Вы начинающий, то почему думаете что дешевизна обязательно должна соседствовать с качеством ?) Обычно знаете ли бывает немного наоборот)

Уже очень хотят контролировать и облагать налогом. Вот еще бы компенсировали кто ушел в глубокий минус. Но, это уже фантастика.

See there are so many phase of life which you want to experience so you get to know the culture of the collage and how to live life without parent if you are staying in hostel.  That is the time where you can explore yourself and make carrier goals.

Paying taxes can improved one's income. Paying right taxes will the economy to develop and increase  interms of lively hood programs that will lead to successful economy.

many people do not pay taxes due to tax bills,
they forget that paying taxes is their duty.

Правильно, пусть всё рухнет, всем же от этого лучше будет. Образование улучшится, дороги построят везде, зарплаты увеличатся.   Совсем-то тупить не надо, алё

Your trying to argue tax is theft? I agree I dont like it either and I wish it was less but still it literally pays for everything in your economy that functions well. Roads, schools, unemployment, government employment, healthcare

if you are lucky, and I am sure many more. Is it theft when you are able to go to school? Is it theft when you walk on a paved road rather than dirt? Do think about every side of the coin before you speak because your analogy

although probably speaks for a lot of individuals is way off base and massively incorrect.