Seems friedcat sold all the baldes.

Altering the 70/30 split would require a shareholder vote and I'm not yet convinced that doing so is necessary. We'll still have 665ish in our growth fund after this purchase and we'll continue to pile up more while waiting on our additional 800Gh/s. If we continue to see these quickening +30% retargets then we may have to make a change, but I'm hesitant to reduce our dividends unnecessarily.

Cheers. 

Sounds like a great deal.  So why is DMS.MINING falling rapidly in price?

Becoming insulting. Thats all you got? LOL!

In terms of friedcat and ASICMINER we were talking about the corruption that usual businesses in china face EVERYDAY and the threats that is imposing to ASICMINER. Such corruption is simply not happening in the US. In china there is simply no jurisdiction that you can rely on. That means that a random functionary of the communist party can force you to pay him his new pool or tomorrow you wont be doing business anymore.

To complain and whine about evil wall street may or may not be justified, but in this context of ASICMINER and doing business in china it is simply annoying and missplaced.

We don't know if they started renting their hashpower, if that's the case the dividend prediction obviously lacks this information.

And, not to forget, SELLING yields a 1000 fuckin' % per year!!!!!111eleven 

By definition annual dividend yield is inversely proportional to share price.

Now if you want to claim that annual dividends is not proportional to share price, then sure.

It looks at AM's mining wallet and divides by 400K .

The suggestion that AM is in a bubble begs us to define exactly what a bubble actually is. I prefer this definition:

"A surge in equity prices, often more than warranted by the fundamentals and usually in a particular sector, followed by a drastic drop in prices as a massive selloff occurs."

We know there was (and still is) a surge in prices. This is a matter of record and irrefutable. But this alone does not make a bubble.

The first question an investor must ask is whether or not the surge is warranted by fundamentals. This aspect has been hotly debated since before we at 2.0, and I expect can only be answered for any given timeframe or value in retrospect. Some people believe 5.0 is not warranted. Heck, if you scratch around enough you can still find people who think 2.0 is unwarranted. One thing is certain: there is nowhere near enough information about AM financial structure to even begin to do a proper analysis. The truth is that we really don't know the fundamentals, so we do not know if it warranted... period.

There has not been a drastic drop in prices. This is also a matter of record.

I would suggest that the recent volume of sales could well be considered massive. The volume of shares at auctions for direct shares has increased substantially recently, however, they did nothing but temporarily stabilize the prices. Likewise, volumes on the exchanges have accelerated as well, but once again, there are still plenty of buyers driving the prices even higher.

If we did not see the increased volumes of sales I might suspect a bubble forming as the trade was being pushed up because of a thinning of the market. But the number of liquid shares appears to be increasing without driving the price down. This is not a sign of a bubble, but rather, of an undervalued asset.

Me too.
I'm totally no interested in selling shares, I just want to buy, hold, and gather dividends...