 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Im using 5 x Nvidia P104-100 4GB, havent used these rigs for well over 2 years. Now I installed PhoenixMiner 5.4c and when I run the "start_miner" file, it quickly close the cmd window (I managed to printscreen) before they close each time I run. Any idea what seems to be the problem and solution would be very much appreciated.  It basically says "No OpenCL platforms found" Try 4.9c. None of the 5.x versions work for my Evga p104s. But 4.9c ive had running for about 10 days since I switched form 5 to 4.9. Thanks mate. I'm lucky to have your answer =) Wil try em out now. Btw another rig of mine has 4xP104-100 (4GB) and 1xRX580. May I know how do it set them up to mine without issues? Do i have to use dual mining only able to maximise them? |
|
|
|
Im using 5 x Nvidia P104-100 4GB, havent used these rigs for well over 2 years. Now I installed PhoenixMiner 5.4c and when I run the "start_miner" file, it quickly close the cmd window (I managed to printscreen) before they close each time I run. Any idea what seems to be the problem and solution would be very much appreciated. It basically says "No OpenCL platforms found" |
|
|
|
Hi there. I know it is decentralized of course, but what I meant is that had Satoshi be punished and asked to assist in destroying bitcoin (Im sure no one thought about this before), there are many ways he can do so. Looking at the mess of forking, 51 attack just part of the mess im talking about that brings the death of Bitcoin
again bitcoin is decentralized and Satoshi is just a developer and he doesn't have any more power than any other programmer out there specially at this point that the network has grown this big and is still growing. the only thing that revelation of Satoshi can affect is the price and that is only because it is assumed that Satoshi may control a large amount of bitcoin. but you are not talking about price you are talking about "destroying bitcoin" which is not possible. as you can see the forking mess was a temporary drama and the 51% attacks have been a part of the forks (the altcoins) just like it has always been. for years different altcoins have been under 51% attack that wipes out their blocks and creates nuisance for exchanges that did not start with these forked coins. Assuming the theory of satoshi being actually just a single guy that had a moment of inspiration to come up with his byzantine generals solution mixed with all the previous work by Szabo, Wei Dao, Adam Back and others... it would be a disaster if he decided to stay public. It only damages the project, having a real person around in my opinion. Just look at Vitalik, the guy is a meme, he has too much power, his tweets can shake the market, we don't want that in Bitcoin. He would be constant target, constantly scrutinized for what he says and how he thinks, it would have an impact on the price, kind of like Trump with the USD, again we don not want that. Overall I think he did the right thing. He also did the right thing by never touching the coins again. If he ever moved these coins it would be a disaster for the market. Great explanation with logic. Kudos to you |
|
|
|
i relive my stress with heavy metal and linking park.
Its Linken Park not Linking Park or Drinking Park my fwen  |
|
|
|
|
Read Crypto New. Buy ICO. Invest in Bitcoin and gopd alternative coins. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
If not, the whole crypto bubble is gonna collapse
|
|
|
|
|
Ok noted with that. Thanks for all the feedbacks and advices =)
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm getting more and more PM spamming from users for bounties. (4 last week)
That must have been due to the fact that you have registered to some of the bounty and you are identified as the interest group. Anyway, it can be annoying sometimes |
|
|
|
What about anonymous companies with Decentralized Platform, like Peer - to - Peer exchange where moneys doesnt kept by the company, buyers and sellers deal directly with each other and the Exchange provide Escrow services? I see these as a good fit to the future of crypto moving forward. All the Centralized service are gonna face hard time with the ever changing rules and regulations, as well as pressure on its operating countries which could make Peer to Peer anonymous companies go way faster and grow bigger without restrictions
decentralized exchanges also have their limitations. for example if you want to use banks to transfer money you still have to endure KYC and a lot of the money transferring methods have charge back issues that increases the risk of getting scammed. and trading face to face with cash is not possible for everyone. in the end we will always need the centralized exchanges to have a place where we can easily transfer money to and from and trade instantly and speculate about bitcoin price. decentralized exchanges with crypto to crypto exchange is a different story though because it is all using blockchain technology it can be done fast and easy without any problems. they will be the future and the altcoin exchanges will be extinct in a couple of years in my opinion. Centralized cannot avoid KYC. Crypto to crypto trading yes and no. What about Escrow services the P2P Exchanges for Fiat - Crypto. They can be fully anonymous and every is still working without anyone |
|
|
|
I don’t know why you want to send private messages instead of publishing the airdrop on the proper board. I would say it would result at least in a warning but I’m sure some moderator will give you the proper answer later on.
The reason why is that the forum has so many threads and not all participants in other Airdrops will see it. So it might be good idea to send message to them privately because there is no public tagging system here.. |
|
|
|
|
Hi per the title, better ask before it happens. Thank you
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, I had this thinking out of a sudden when I see all exchanges and services surround cryptocurrencies asking for KYC documents!
I started to relate this to Satoshi Nagamoto and the inception of Bitcoin. The reason why Bitcoin is unstoppable, apart from its Blockchain Fundamental, another biggest reason would be that Satoshi Nagamoto is anonymous. Had he exposed himself at the early inception days of Bitcoin, the government/authority from all over the world, including the Rothchilds Familys, Dragon Fund and the sort would hunt him down and make Bitcoin a stillbirth.
So had any services and exchanges provider remain anonymous rather than exposing their company and their team just to please the public (avoid being called a scam), we would have a better Crypto Space now!
Whats your thought on this? Do you support the future Exchanges and Serivce Providers to be anonymous? And why?
You can not equate Bitcoin with centralized services Bitcoin is a decentralized currency, decentralized currency is not controlled by company or foundation and this factor makes Bitcoin not easily killed by regulation Crypto exchanges requesting KYC verification is a centralized service, complying with regulations is a must for centralized services, if they don't comply with regulations then the exchange service can be killed Whats your thought on this? Do you support the future Exchanges and Serivce Providers to be anonymous? And why?
Yeah you have made it right that I cant equate Bitcoin with Centralized services.
I don't support centralized services with anonymous companies because it's dangerous if there is a problem with the service, customers will find it difficult to sue the anonymous team What about anonymous companies with Decentralized Platform, like Peer - to - Peer exchange where moneys doesnt kept by the company, buyers and sellers deal directly with each other and the Exchange provide Escrow services? I see these as a good fit to the future of crypto moving forward. All the Centralized service are gonna face hard time with the ever changing rules and regulations, as well as pressure on its operating countries which could make Peer to Peer anonymous companies go way faster and grow bigger without restrictions |
|
|
|
I think not. BTC will not be as successful as today if Satoshi Nakamoto will reveal himself to public. He might get arrested by the authority for creating Bitcoin. We don't know on what charges but I think, will think of something just to arrest Satoshi Nakamoto because it is against the banking system.
Exactly what I described above |
|
|
|
|
Seem like its going down further.
|
|
|
|
What is different IEO and ICO
Though it is off topic here. But I can simply answer: IEO is a token sale that is done on its own exchange. The benefit of investing in an IEO is that they have a ready and working product and the token sale is carried out on the Exchange itself. Also, the liquidity is there as you wont have to wait for months for the token to be listed on other exchange which then only you will be able to trade it. |
|
|
|
|
From Mining, Trading, ICO, IEO, Bounty to given Blockchain classes. Im all involved =)
Will even starting own blockchain project in the near future
|
|
|
|
Hi there. I know it is decentralized of course, but what I meant is that had Satoshi be punished and asked to assist in destroying bitcoin (Im sure no one thought about this before), there are many ways he can do so. Looking at the mess of forking, 51 attack just part of the mess im talking about that brings the death of Bitcoin
again bitcoin is decentralized and Satoshi is just a developer and he doesn't have any more power than any other programmer out there specially at this point that the network has grown this big and is still growing. the only thing that revelation of Satoshi can affect is the price and that is only because it is assumed that Satoshi may control a large amount of bitcoin. but you are not talking about price you are talking about "destroying bitcoin" which is not possible. as you can see the forking mess was a temporary drama and the 51% attacks have been a part of the forks (the altcoins) just like it has always been. for years different altcoins have been under 51% attack that wipes out their blocks and creates nuisance for exchanges that did not start with these forked coins. Yup I totally agree with you on this. However, my main point here is "at early inception of Bitcoin, the revelation of Satoshi's identity could lead to a different story that we see it now". For example, the whole world would be brainwash to believe that Bitcoin was developed to destory the world financial system (rather than improving it); and that Bitcoin is a scam and controlled by the drug cartel etc, investing in it is as good as throwing money down the drain and anyone invested and caught would be punished. All this would happen if Satoshi's identity was revealed and forced to be labelled on the bad names I simply suggest above, or accusing him of anything that could think of. well i feel like there are two different subjects here. one is destroying bitcoin, as in killing it and it no longer exist afterwards. and another is to crash the market and price dropping down. the second one is obviously possible and can even be easy with the scenario that you are describing. many will sell, panic, run away,... so there would be a crash. but the first one is impossible because at the end of the day nothing about bitcoin itself is going to change. only the perception can change. the thing about peer to peer systems is that they will exist as long as there is one peer on the network. for instance you can start telling everyone Torrent (a peer to peer system) is illegal and is used for pirating only and by criminals to share illegal content. well that will lead many to uninstall their Torrent programs and stop using it but it won't kill Torrenting. so next time you download Ubuntu for example you could see a drop in number of seed (peers) but there will still be seeds. Haha Im relieved now that Im being understood. Yes I do not mean Killing it, its impossible. I mean exactly the second situation, and what a great example you gave about Torrent. Thats spot on and described the situation perfectly =) |
|
|
|
Hi there. I know it is decentralized of course, but what I meant is that had Satoshi be punished and asked to assist in destroying bitcoin (Im sure no one thought about this before), there are many ways he can do so. Looking at the mess of forking, 51 attack just part of the mess im talking about that brings the death of Bitcoin
again bitcoin is decentralized and Satoshi is just a developer and he doesn't have any more power than any other programmer out there specially at this point that the network has grown this big and is still growing. the only thing that revelation of Satoshi can affect is the price and that is only because it is assumed that Satoshi may control a large amount of bitcoin. but you are not talking about price you are talking about "destroying bitcoin" which is not possible. as you can see the forking mess was a temporary drama and the 51% attacks have been a part of the forks (the altcoins) just like it has always been. for years different altcoins have been under 51% attack that wipes out their blocks and creates nuisance for exchanges that did not start with these forked coins. A newbie perception, please do your home, learn more about your posting, it seems like that your just trying make question on this forum, as stated above Bitcoin is Decentralized, no one is in control. The issue on the price market now, is different story affected by a lot indicators, the volume of investment, HODL, FUD, Scammer,Banned, and the never ending issue on Regulation by the government financial institution globally, not to mention the fake news about Bitcoin. It seems that you are the one who is trying to make post to earn activity point without even elaborating what is your point here? We arent talking about prices here my friend |
|
|
|
Hi there. I know it is decentralized of course, but what I meant is that had Satoshi be punished and asked to assist in destroying bitcoin (Im sure no one thought about this before), there are many ways he can do so. Looking at the mess of forking, 51 attack just part of the mess im talking about that brings the death of Bitcoin
again bitcoin is decentralized and Satoshi is just a developer and he doesn't have any more power than any other programmer out there specially at this point that the network has grown this big and is still growing. the only thing that revelation of Satoshi can affect is the price and that is only because it is assumed that Satoshi may control a large amount of bitcoin. but you are not talking about price you are talking about "destroying bitcoin" which is not possible. as you can see the forking mess was a temporary drama and the 51% attacks have been a part of the forks (the altcoins) just like it has always been. for years different altcoins have been under 51% attack that wipes out their blocks and creates nuisance for exchanges that did not start with these forked coins. Yup I totally agree with you on this. However, my main point here is "at early inception of Bitcoin, the revelation of Satoshi's identity could lead to a different story that we see it now". For example, the whole world would be brainwash to believe that Bitcoin was developed to destory the world financial system (rather than improving it); and that Bitcoin is a scam and controlled by the drug cartel etc, investing in it is as good as throwing money down the drain and anyone invested and caught would be punished. All this would happen if Satoshi's identity was revealed and forced to be labelled on the bad names I simply suggest above, or accusing him of anything that could think of. |
|
|
|
I can't disagree with the idea that if Satoshi was known Bitcoin would be alive because I too believe a big power would have came and shut it down. Because of this I try my best to only support and use anonymous exchanges but moving forward that may be impossible (centralized exchanges though), but we may have an alternative yet (DEX's).
Exactly my point here. Some Government, high power fellas would have done anything within their power to stop Bitcoin. Whether it is decentralized or not doesnt matter, they have ways to do it if you get what I mean. Think out of the box |
|
|
|
|
