Do you think different marketing quality is the only reason for the significant difference in coin market cap between Darkcoin and Anoncoin,     $ 2,649,719 vs. $ 615,943 ?

Could be when looking at Google Trends. Darkcoin interest continues to rise while the searches for Anoncoin are looking similar to the ANC chart, both getting closer and closer to the all time low.

Hallo,

jetzt hat es doch geklappt!

Danke für Deine Hilfe!

Ich kriege zwar die erste Test-Wallet irgendwie nicht wieder geladen aktuell. Aber die war ja zum Glück nur zum Testen

Bin den anderen Wallets klappt es jetzt alles so wie es sollte!

Problem solved, it's working now, thanks a lot for your help!!

Okay, thanks a lot! It's now working in the right direction.

How long does it normally take until the balance finally shows up in Litecoin-QT?

So far I can only see the last transaction on the right hand side.

But the expected balance is not showing up, this stays at 0.00 LTC

Hallo,

ich habe die Wallet verschlüsselt und die wallet.dat gespeichert und dann kopiert. In der wallet.dat ist doch mein Private Key, oder?

Ich hatte eigentlich auch gedacht dass es so funktionieren würde wie Du schreibst, bin dann aber etwas verunsichert worden da es nicht so recht klappen will bisher.

Wie ich verstehe ist es wichtig die wallet.dat genau am richtigen Ort zu speichern oder zu löschen, damit Litecoin-QT dass dann automatisch verarbeitet.

Ich hatte vorher wie bei Dir auch im Internet den Hinweis gefunden dass die wallet.dat in folgenden Verzeichnis gefunden werden kann nach dem Speichern: C:\Users\"Your Username"\Appdata\Roaming\Litecoin\wallet.dat

Muss ich ein solches Verzeichnis selbst anlegen?

Von selbst hat QT ein solches Verzeichnis nicht angelegt und auch nicht dort gespeichert. Ich habe keinen solchen Pfad. Bei mir landet die (automatische) Speicherung immer bei C:\Users\"Your Username"\ Dokumente

Ich habe auf beiden Rechnern Windows 8 auf deutsch, vielleicht ist es da ein anderes Verzeichnis? Zu Windows 8 spezifisch habe ich leider noch keine Hinweise gefunden im Net.

Hallo zusammen, ich teste gerade das offline speichern von Litecoins mittels Private Keys.

Der Private Key wurde auf PC 1 aus Litecoin QT heraus gespeichert und mit einem Passwort geschützt.

Auch wenn ich die .dat Datei mit dem Private Key lösche zeigt mir Litecoin QT auf diesem PC immer noch den ursprünglichen Kontostand.

Ich will mit dem Private Key den Kontostand auf einen anderen PC (PC 2) zu Litecoin QT übertragen und habe die Datei dorthin kopiert.

Wie kann ich den Private Key nun dort aus der .dat Datei zu Litecoin QT hochladen (es gibt ja keinen Buttom für "Hochladen" oder Ähnliches)?

Vielen Dank!

Hello everyone,

I am starting to save my Litecoins offline with private keys.

Trying this out I succeeded to create the needed .dat file with the private key and it's secured with strong password.

Although I removed the .dat file from the PC (PC 1), the balance of my wallet still shows the initial balance.

And when I copy the .dat file to another PC (PC 2) with Litecoin QT installed, I am not sure how to get the file into QT so that it shows the balance here on PC 2.

How can I load my private key into Litecoin QT on PC 2?

Thanks a lot for your help!

Out of the blue Plus500 stopped the Monthy Bitcoin CFD (existing contracts with lifetime until 30/11) and offered a Daily Bitcoin CFD instead.
Customers were not informed properly and had no possibility to react. Besides this a Daily instrument is no compensation for a monthly contract.
Assuming flat prices, there will not be much left if you have to pay 3% or so spread 2x daily for 2 weeks or 1 month.

Plus500 refers to their terms and conditions, which state that they are allowed to change the structure of existing instruments if they have no hedging possibility.
Initially they claimed they had difficulites to hedge due to higher volatility (but volatility was in line with previous years).
 
In a more detailed second response letter, they now claim they had relied on only one single hedging counter party.
With very short notice, this hedging counter party stopped the monthly hedging agreement and was only willing to do a daily hedging agreement instead.
This was the reason why they had to close all outstanding Monthy Bitcoin instruments and offered Daily Bitcoin CFDs instead.
 
I see two alternatives:
 
1) They tell the truth when it comes to this hedging agreement with only one single counter party. But even then I would argue that they had all hedging possibilities they needed
(all exchanges working properly) but they explicitly choose not to hedge. This was their own choice and can not be a reason to break existing contracts.
 
2) They do not tell the truth when it comes to this hedging agreement with only one single counter party. This would not make the situation better for them...

I think the company was founded in Israel and then moved to Cyprus. They have a licence to operate within the EU, therfor they should comply with EU laws.
If not, they should loose the licence to operate within the EU.

I will have the regulators and the legal authorities to have a look at this issue.

If you want to contact me, you can post here or via PM.

Looking for victims of potential fraud at Plus500 UK Limited

Company sold monthly Bitcoin CFD instruments to their customer base. Around mid November Plus500 suddenly closed all outstanding monthly Bitcoin instruments (expiry date 30/11 !) without consent from their clients. Clients found out by change that their BTC exposure "disappeared" despite monthly contract. Positions were closed at a BTC price of USD 582. As a consequence clients suffered significant losses due to lack of BTC exposure when prices continued to rise beyond USD 1200 in the second half of November.

I am currently in the process of collecting information to file regulatory and legal actions against Plus500 UK Limited. I want the regulatory authorities to have a look at this case and to decide if we have to deal with a fraud case or not.

If there are more investors who suffered from this "very honest" treatment of clients, please contact me here and we can share information etc. going forward.

Unteresting question, could be. If you want to install a global currency, you have to crash the existing ones first. Then people would be willing to drop their existing national currencies to move to a global currency. In such a case the motivation to switch would be significantly higher if their is no direct link to government and central banks (responsible for the crash of the old currencies). I think it would be very difficult to install a global currency which is not accepted by the people. It would be much more easy if the people ask for such a global currency as an alternative to the existing national currencies. Of course the governments would need to take control of this global currency over time. If this is not possible, they would not push it. But if everything is tracked and monitored on the net, they could find a way to stay on top of things?

Welcome !