Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 05:20:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: February 01, 2018, 05:02:46 PM
Here is my previous post #691
The quoted texts are from coin-artist twitter account.
i've smelt the scam.

https://twitter.com/coin_artist/status/829061915695525888


I would like to point out that via this Twitter interaction on Feb 7, 2017, she said some people are REALLY close to a solution https://twitter.com/coin_artist/status/829061915695525888
Hahahahhaa she is clever look what did she say:

Quote
there's too much money at stake to give hints :-p I hope it never gets solved.
Quote
some ppl are really close to a solution, so I don't want to aid THOSE ppl
as i expected and said before this puzzle made in such a way thats impossible to solve without hints because she wants to become famous, she knows that no one can solve it.
Quote
there's too much money at stake to give hints
thats not true because the value of the puzzle was only less than 2000$ in April 2014 so why she didn't give any hints that year?
Quote
I hope it never gets solved
yes i know because you want to become famous as long as nobody solves it and the prize value increases and everyone will talk about your unsolved puzzle.
Quote
some ppl are really close to a solution, so I don't want to aid THOSE ppl
 
ok its clear now why she doesn't want to give aid, but saying that some ppl are really close to a solution this is a big lie that only stupid followers believe it.  

Never seen someone triggered so Hard. The nerdrage is strong in you. Stop making posts without a Single proof but you're twisted reality.
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: January 19, 2018, 12:37:03 PM
...
Are the hashes I used in the picture. Worth a try, but I don't think this will lead to anything. At least not with the transaction hashes.

I think it's the other way around. You would get nothing by finding the transactions in the picture, transactions are already known. The idea would be to get hash in this manner from something that is drawn in the picture, and since the WIF private key format is basically a hash use it to collect the reward. Since his visualizations and hashes are mapped 1:1, and he generates them from hashes, one should in theory reverse his code and get the hash from visualizations. Lot's of work, but interesting possibility. I wounder what is the source of the info the author of the puzzle thank'd Rob Myers for his work and said "He’s one of the ones who 'Made this possible'". Is this true? Link somewhere?

Interesting idea. But I think you need to know exactly what piece of the picture has to be reversed to a hash. Every slightest piece of information will change the hash, so you even need to know the right angle and size of the figure you want to reverse to get a correct hash. Reversing itself won't be that hard.

On the other hand coin_artist's comment on Rob Myers doesn't necessarily mean that she used something he published to make this puzzle. Maybe they exchanged ideas or discussed possibile puzzle-solving-steps and she thanks him for his help. Or he wrote a special piece of code just for this puzzle which was never published.

Thanks again, I didn't get nothing useful, but it was worth trying, another searched path. If someone else wants to check it, now it's clear with your explanations.

It's always fun to see some new ideas in this thread and play around with them  Smiley

3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: January 19, 2018, 09:20:05 AM
https://imgur.com/a/OcVDr

This is what you get with the same hashes and the game of life simulation.
First picture is the end result after 100 turns. Second picture is the first turn you get.

If you want to try some other visualizations yourself, you don't have to change much code.
You only need to change the initConnection block to:

Code:
var initConnection = function (spec) {
  appendHash("74e037e5b7cea4512625a4af5a1223dbaf5ae3fb629c47263086091c0ba5328b");
  appendHash("1469167e08a116438943319880f415bb8afe279df68aeaaa32186cf4b7d297da");
  appendHash("ed07c5a6c63313f9b6828d3cb8f1d2ead3a4e8eb92ddbf12297c912e9ade3e60");
  appendHash("4879431128d7dc5a8e0e6e7d739bb2246f8537db1cd6f5971fdff6c4d4d301c2");
  appendHash("9c6d9a78bb8a7ee9f78af0944edce9abbe67f835355ba872da618abb6b841f47");
  appendHash("1f49d498f476cf87a62dce43ebf655051b193971a2b8e8e6df71e2aaa329b42f");
  appendHash("458727dbd63f48c833c3d29ea2013281f8bbb0ca8b17a00600972350c273d98e");
};

Save the file and open the responding transactions-*.html file in your browser.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: January 19, 2018, 08:52:19 AM
https://imgur.com/a/uYdmJ

This is what you get if you use the turtle.js code to draw the transaction hashes.

Code:
  appendHash("74e037e5b7cea4512625a4af5a1223dbaf5ae3fb629c47263086091c0ba5328b");
  appendHash("1469167e08a116438943319880f415bb8afe279df68aeaaa32186cf4b7d297da");
  appendHash("ed07c5a6c63313f9b6828d3cb8f1d2ead3a4e8eb92ddbf12297c912e9ade3e60");
  appendHash("4879431128d7dc5a8e0e6e7d739bb2246f8537db1cd6f5971fdff6c4d4d301c2");
  appendHash("9c6d9a78bb8a7ee9f78af0944edce9abbe67f835355ba872da618abb6b841f47");
  appendHash("1f49d498f476cf87a62dce43ebf655051b193971a2b8e8e6df71e2aaa329b42f");
  appendHash("458727dbd63f48c833c3d29ea2013281f8bbb0ca8b17a00600972350c273d98e");
Are the hashes I used in the picture. Worth a try, but I don't think this will lead to anything. At least not with the transaction hashes.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: December 29, 2017, 10:09:00 AM
Ok guys, the traffic in this thread is increasing.

I don't think there is any multidimensional stuff going on in this picture. And even those "micro"-things are just the cloud-effect.
CoinArtist posted the low res version on twitter. So there is no reason to think, there is anything usefull that is only visible in the high res version with 10000% zoom.

But CoinArtist also pointed to the poem a few times on twitter. But I couldn't get anything out of it, so I stopped looking at the text.

It for sure is nothing, but yesterday I thought "why only google for the text of the poem? Let's check out a picture of the original release!". So I fired up picture search and found a scan of the original poem. With borders.
So let's turn the 1FLAMEN6-image 90 degrees, scale the poem-picture to match with the borders of 1FLAMEN6 and blend them.

What to look at now? The vines look interesting. They point to words and letters. First three words are "All Truth here". So after a mini-heart attack I checked the rest and guess what? Gibberish.
So I looked at the letters, but it doesn't seem to make any sense at all.

Maybe one of you guys can get something out of that?
https://imgur.com/a/PBix7
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Legend of Satoshi Nakamato, FINAL STEP PUBLISHED.... 4.87 BTC GRAND PRIZE! on: December 20, 2017, 09:36:20 AM
I'm a bit late to the party but done some experiements with the flames on the border.

The datasets provided by other users seem to be consistent with a number of 152 flames. But no one knows in which order or direction you have to read them.
So what I did is the hard way: I wrote a little script, which tries every possible combination you can read the flames in.

The dataset I used is:

Code:
outer_top_left_to_right = "001101100111001101"
outer_right_top_to_bottom = "001111000101"
outer_bottom_right_to_left = "0011111011010001"
outer_left_bottom_to_top = "01101101"

inner_top_left_to_right = "0110110110100010110110110011"
inner_right_top_to_bottom = "110111110110110111110010"
inner_bottom_right_to_left = "100011100010110111110111110111110"
inner_left_bottom_to_top = "0111001101101"

Of course I tried them forwards and backwards, so I don't miss the right combination.
What I did than, is use the binary strings (152 bit long each) and parse them to ASCII. So I got lots of strings (around 200 MB as a txt file with 10339728 lines)

Example:
Code:
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž*}·Þm¢ÛYÍ–Î
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž*}·Þm¢Û[:Îl
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž*}·Ý³¬æÌÛE¶
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž*}·Ý³³mÚÎl
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³¬æÌÛE¶O¶û
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³¬æÄûo¼ÛE¶
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³³mÚÎlO¶û
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³³mÙ>ÛîÎl
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³“í¾ìæÌÛE¶
m>Ñ}÷Ú8ž-³“í¾ómÚÎl
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœØx©ößvÎ
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœØx¶ÎO¶û
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœØŸmöx¶Î
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœØŸm÷lãÅ
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœÙlãÅO¶û
m>Ñ}÷Ú8æÚ-µœÙläûo³Å

As expected, there are a lot of non printable characters in there, so I stripped all of them and took a look at my file.
What is left looks like this (just a few lines of the output left after filtering):
Code:
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈñO´[h¶ÎÎl
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·Èñ[h¶ÎÎl>Ñ
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·Èñ[h¶ÌûFÎl
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈûFÎl<VÚ-³
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈûFÎlm¢Û3Å
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈûDñlæÆÚ-³
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈûDñ[h¶ÎÎl
Ž-÷ß9µ·}·ÈûE¶‹lìæÃÅ

What I did know is look for words ("you", "www", "dot", "found", etc) in this file. But nothing can be found.

So what I can say is:
- if my dataset is right and the encoding is in the length of the flames (long = 1, short = 0) you need to find the right starting point
- this starting point is not on a edge
- maybe we need to decode the flames not in ASCII

I hear you guys say: "But 680cfbb909, what about that Bacon cipher we told you about?"
Don't worry, I got you covered!

Bacon cipher uses 5 bit (A/B) to encode one letter. We have 152 flames. So either there are 2 flames too much, or we need to find 3 more to
make the cipher work right.

But I'm a scientist and we do stupid things all the the time, so I wrote my binary strings (152 bit each) to a file and tried to decode them with
that bacon-dude's cipher.

What I found are some words in the strings, mostly "YOU" but to be honest: I decoeded 1,7 GB of binary strings. If you decode such a huge
dataset, it is possible to find a lot of words by coincidence. Of course I checked the lines strings that have a "YOU" in it after I threw that
bacon cipher on to them. But none of those lines made any sense after the "YOU". There's only gibberish.

Conclusion:
Bacon Cipher and ASCII encoding doesn't work on the flames if we don't have the right starting point or use some other encoding before
we convert them to ASCII or use bacon to decrypt them.


So how to find a starting point? TBH, I don't have the slightest idea.
Let's look at the poem.

Code:
Phoenix and the Turtle fled 
In a mutual flame from hence.
...
Two distincts, division none:
Number there in love was slain.
...
Flaming in the Phoenix' sight:
Either was the other's mine.

What I think is important here is "phoenix' sight". So take a look at the phoenix' eye.
It is the only element, which is aligned with the chess fields and their borders.

If you follow this line to the top, it ends right on a leaf which points to a spot that
has no flame in it.

Maybe this can be the starting point? But what about the ribbons on the key? They aren't there for nothing. And in which direction should we read the flames?
Maybe those greek-key-thingies tell us something?
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!