 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Would love to see support for xmrig as well!
|
|
|
|
Also, I do not know if someone notice it or not but 1770 MH/S on XVG or 3750 MH/S without the ohgodanETHlargementPill mining hashrate on blake2s algorithm for XVG is around 7400$ profit per month or 15900$ respectively...
Sounds to much for me. I have checked it using cryptotomine.com so unless the website doesn’t know what they are taking about (which could be) those numbers realbminer posted are missing a dot.
What do you guys think or get using dual mining???
i think bminer is way too late late to dual mining. enlargmentpill makes eth mining worthwhile for 1080x users, but throwing another algo in there is more electricity use for less eth. i woulidn't touch it, especially for the higher dev fee. stick with claymore and a dev fee remover for strictly ethereum mining if thats what you're after. |
|
|
|
Given community support, ravencoin could get a listing on Binance through their 'community coin of the month' program, whereby coins can get listed at a discount if they receive enough votes from the community for a listing. That would be my suggestion, particularly given it is still a relatively new coin it would definitely fit the criteria.
lets make this happen. how can we get a dev to fill out the application? Binance Community Coin of the Month Round 7 should start soon |
|
|
|
We’re pleased to release Bminer 7.0.0. The release provides experimental supports for mining Ethereum. Please see https://www.bminer.me for more details. Happy mining! lol why would anyone come from a miner like claymore with a 1% dev fee want to try your experimental ethereum mining with your 2% dev fee and private connection? what a waste of time coding for ethereum support...wow. can't wait to see the over reported hashrates on ethereum lol |
|
|
|
Normalized Average Results - After 2 Rounds | #1 | * | | Var Diff | | 184.27 RVN | | #2 | -2.74% | | d=36 | | 179.35 RVN | | #3 | -3.09% | | d=50 | | 1178.76 RVN |
you have a typo in your results 1178.76 rvn i think you mean 178.76 rvn  |
|
|
|
I just tried bminer and I'm getting better rates than I was with dstm with the same clocks so I'm going to let it run for a day and see if it's stable
Those better rates are fake. I get about 1000 sol difference between console and pool. Lot of people have said bminer fakes data in console. I didn't see such kind of people. it's boring to see someone who keeps posting such kind of things under this thread. you are in denial. just stop already. its completely obvious that bminer over reports hashrate in the console or hes taking more than 2%. bminer's reported hashrate is 3% higher than dstm reported output but still has the same hashrate pool side. stop ignoring the obvious |
|
|
|
gettilee,
where do you see it supports bminer?
looks like he might have removed bminer from his thread but its still on his github page (probably a typo after updating his changelog) https://github.com/Undertrey/FarmWatchBot/releases bmnautorun.bat i'ved used it with bminer before but always had better results with dstm |
|
|
|
After 2 days using Bminer v.6.0.0 I noticed a slight decrease of rejected shares in comparison with previous versions, but still a little more than in DSTM(
And what about the performance? Well, on my system, it is the same as with DSTM - no less but no more as it should be (as it report in console).
In my own opinion maybe Bminer sending more than 2% to developer and that is why my hashrate on the Pool is 5% less than miner report in console. While the DSTM miner, in the same system, give me only 2% less (as it should be).
For now I will stay with Bminer because it is more stable on my rigs, but I hope the Developer will improve his miner in the next update and we all will have a really fastest Cuda miner for Equihash)
in response to anyone using bminer just because its more stable than dstm or vice versa. theres another option which i feel is way better than expecting the mining program's watchdog to work 100% bug free. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2071108.0arcefawn made a nice open source FREE watchdog script that works for several miners. its a simple script that you edit how you want to work (he has simple instructions in the cfg file.) very straight forward and works with dstm, bminer, ewbf, claymore, ccminer, ethminer, phoenix, cast xmr, and hes adding more all the time. his script monitors the mining console and resets the miner if it crashes. it monitors your hashrate so if its reporting lower like some gpu's are reporting too low of a hashrate, it can restart the miner. it can reload your overclocking profiles if you set it to. you can set a schedule on how often to restart the miner or the pc. you also has pool fallover support to 5 pools set in your cfg file so if you lose connection you're not mining for nothing. its really a great script and the guy is nice enough to give it away for free. totally worth sending him a donation and then not having to worry about your miner(s) going down |
|
|
|
I am not an expert neither pro Bminer, but your test or asumption is vague. You barely ran Bminer for a couple of hours and the comparason is not fair. It should be made with both miners running at the same time in different machines with exacty the same hardware and settings to have exactly the same conditions. I do agree the invalid share rate is a bit higher. I have just started using Bminer as a try out and I have noticed exactly the same but can´t say is fair either because I am not running both miners at the same time. With DSTM I use to get 0,2% rejected shares and with Bminer so far is nearly 0,5% but I have only been running it for the past 12 hours and been playing with the windows energy management to cut down the CPU. This is my performance with 6 GTX 1070 Ti, 70% TDP, +200 clock, +700 memory:  And this is Flypool:  There are more fluctuations with Bminer so far, but as I said I have only used the miner for the past 12 hours and I´ve playing with the CPU energy to cut down so more Watts so It will need another 24 to 48 hours to be stable on the pool. I´ll post again the results in 24 hours my post wasn't claiming any kind of test. i simply showed how many invalid shares bminer 6.0 was producing in just a few hours compared to dstm which was running with considerably less over a longer period of time. i was curious to see what "improvements" bminer had with this latest build and i don't see any hashrate improvement for 1070ti's nor do i see a drop in invalid shares. i've ran tests before on bminer vs dstm on the same pool at the same time with the same hardware. bminer has always had more invalid shares than dstm. bminer also over reports hashrate by 3% on console that is not reflected in the pool. combine that with the private connection...either bminer is lying about the console reported hashrate or that hes taking more than 2% because the pool (flypool for my tests) does not reflect the 3% console gain over dstm. |
|
|
|
switched from dstm 0.6 to bminer 6.0 to see if there was any performance gains with the bminer update there was NOT any increased hashrate on 1070ti's and the invalid shares improvement in the changelog was not decreased. the increase in invalid shares from dstm to bminer is pretty big.  |
|
|
|
6x1063 hynix, test 48h
bminer: local 1960hs flypool average: 1790
dstm: local 1900hs flypool average: 1860
bminer not honest
please show your screenshots otherwise I don't believe any words from you whose account is totally new. i find your short post history to be pro bminer biased. you did a test of 6 hours each (not running at the same time so different difficulty) and you have been cheerleading since. sorry but i prefer to see large enough hashrate rigs side by side mining with both miners to see a real comparision. i've ran my 1070ti rigs with both dstm and bminer and have seen a much higher reported hashrate in console yet the same average hashrate pool side as dstm. dstm hashrate seems more stable where bminer's hashrate is all over the place on flypool. i'm no fan of either dstm or bminer, but with bminers history of using sock puppet accounts on other forums to promote his miner...and seeing your post history, you look more suspicious than someone that posts the obvious that bminer reports a higher hashrate at the console than whats reported at the pool. theres no denying that. |
|
|
|
5.5.0 has released. - Show the fan speed in both console and UI.
- Fix compatibility issues for pool.miningspeed.com.
- Fix a bug that causes Bminer fails to start on Windows under some configuration.
Happy mining! yet again, realbminer ignores page after page of concerns and questions. 1. he won't remove the private connection 2. console over reports hashrate 3. rejected shares due to the same seed for the nonce every time a new job is sent by the pool realbminer doesn't deserve a 2% dev fee. hes just doing cosmetic updates while the miner has many serious flaws. i'm done with bminer |
|
|
|
I second this idea, but if shady things are happening, Voskcoin would even need to obfuscate his rig names (so Bminer does not know they are Voskcoin rigs), and run them for longer than 24 hours side by side one on DSTM one Bminer, same hash rate, against the same pool, with seperate wallet address or User names, if for instance he chooses (Suprnova?), a truly blind study, so as to insure that the Bminer coder does not give preferential treatment to Voskcoin rigs, since that has been somewhat speculated, that Bminer is tunneling into the rigs remotely and switching pools for longer than any Dev fee should account for...
for sure, don't make it obvious and use voskcoin in the miner name etc  to make it so its easy for someone to manipulate results. ideally a week would be great for a mining trial, and i do believe that alternating the rigs from dstm and bminer every set amount of time would be more accurate. not all hardware is created equal after all. i think flypool is the best pool to use for comparison honestly. stable and reliable... suprnova's dashboard is a disaster lol. |
|
|
|
I've heard a lot of rumors on bminer
Do you trust bminer / use it?
Have you compared it w/ dstm and if so which one earned more (side by side comparison is needed not one after the other)
There seems to be a lot of hate against bminer, anyone have some good links to facts supporting X claim?
several people have tried to compare side by side but they don't have enough hashrate to make it accurate. you should take 2 rigs and compare them for your youtube channel. just run them for 24 hours, swap dstm/bminer on each rig at the 12 hour mark and see what you find out. or do it for a 3 days etc. i know bminer over reports on the console for sure. i've tried it for a few weeks on my 1070ti rig and it was stable/consistent, seemed like it could be a tad faster than dstm...but without running side by side at the same time, who knows lol. side note, how is your mining room remodel going? |
|
|
|
realbminer, you need to add the gpu identifier to your reporting for shares. how is anyone supposed to troubleshoot when we can't identify which gpu is having invalid solutions [INFO] [2018-03-04T18:59:52-05:00] Total 3167.89 Sol/s 1689.23 Nonce/s Accepted shares 14916 Rejected shares 90
[INFO] [2018-03-04T18:59:57-05:00] Received new job ece94fb45eb66adb8a4c
[WARN] [2018-03-04T18:59:57-05:00] Rejected share #15010 ([20, "Invalid Equihash solution"])
[INFO] [2018-03-04T19:00:02-05:00] Accepted share #15011
|
|
|
|
Nice work, it's better than other patch.
both of these guys are the contributors on the github link they posted. you can see that the github user nemosminer has his version of all the popular miners (dstm, ewbf, claymore, ccminer, phoenix, etc) on his repository. i'm sure every single download on his github is infected. do not download from this github or any link from these users. |
|
|
|
I agree that.. you need a Big farm. Since last post i made a ui for win version. Linux Will ofc be terminal tool. Last time i shared something.. NOT a single donation. And i still havent recieved anything.. its okay i would actually be surprised if i Got something.. Beginning of this is my friend who told me about miners and encrypted fee connections. Im making those tools because he ask Nice and buy me a beer now and then. And now its becoming a hobby. Im rus so english NOT great.  get your post count up so we can send you a private message and verify our payment before sending us the download link? i'm happy to pay a reasonable 1 time fee for this, and i think you'd be surprised how many others will as well. on a side note, how does this work? background program that intercepts and replaces the wallet address? the reason i ask is because i use an autorun script to monitor and restart my miners if theres an error and i want to make sure it will work with it. heres the link for reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2071108.0 |
|
|
|
 I made Linux version at release by request from a Company. Well i was bored today.. So working Windows version.. I Will release both Linux and win version for 0.6.0 and onwards when / if i reach. 10 zec donations.. If you Think im a prick you are totally Right. Then make your own. If everyone is going to use this its worth like 34 zec/Day. t1YTy9TAJnHWAtvu9GLazyhRCVdhQdNohsH i'm fine with paying you to share a windows version but i'm unsure the 10 zec total to share it publicly is the best way to do it. i mean say you only get 9 zec, people paid you for nothing lol. can you do a per person fee? i'm sure once people start using it and giving reviews/feedback you'll make more than 10 zec in the long run. |
|
|
|
any one tried Bminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2519271.0 it has a 2 % fee which you can turn off with -nofee the fact i can turn it off makes me want to use it, i don't feel like im being fucked . and it is faster then DSTM with the fee on or seemed to be, with the fee off from what i could test i only lost 10 sol on a four card GTX rig ..but i leave it on like Ive always said . an only turned it off to see how bad it was off. .it's better to me then if i turn off the -nofee 0 with claymores zec miner for amd cards. i've used bminer and its really about the same as dtsm. the no fee option on bminer is very questionable. the dev says turning it off is a 4% decrease in hashrate so you lose more than paying him. bminer has a few other things you should be aware of: 1. it has a private connection that goes to his server. people have been asking for months about what it actually does, and the dev just responds with "bminer will request runtime and licensing information from time to time." very shady since he would have access to your mining hardware and could change mining addresses etc. which i'm guessing is the point, he wants to secure that no one takes his share but who's to say hes "only" taking his fee. 2. it over reports hashrate by a good 3% easily. from all the comparisons i've seen posted/performed (not perfect tests mind you) and from my own mining rigs, i see a very minimal if any increase on poolside vs dtsm. i'm personally hoping someone shares a no fee option for dtsm's and lets us pay him a one time fee for it. |
|
|
|
Fee redirection is made and works well with eu flypool. Still working to make it with user select pools. At this time i can confirm dstm fee is exactly 2%. (my pool reported average + redirect fee is = 2%)  nice job! would love to see you share it and add support for us1-zcash.flypool.org server. make sure to post your zec address so we can donate after we test it! |
|
|
|
|
