Well, Qryptos wants me to scan documments before I am able to fully use the site.

Don't get me wrong, I did that for Coinbase, but Coinbase provides some unique functionality and they are somewhat trustworthy. While I've never heard of Qryptos and no other exchange has required me to do so.

Another month just passed. You launched on the 55th largest exchange ? Are you serious ?

That was 2 months ago. I am still unable to trade my tokens, 4 months after the ICO. My confidence in this project is dropping every day.

Exactly. Depositing 75 crypterium only to not be able to do anything besides withdraw them with 46 crypterium fee does definitely feel like a scam. It is not a scam but it definitely feels like one. It leaves a bad aftertaste. It leaves little confidence in the company and in the project.

An exchange was promised for February, then it was delivered at the end of March, and it is not usable for people who hold small quantities of the token, which is the majority of the token holders.

It's obvious that things are not going as planned. Do not hide information from the token holders, unless you want to lose confidence in the project. You have already lost a lot of confidence, as it's obvious in the price of the token. It's not your fault that the market conditions are very bad right now, but please don't hide information from the token holders.

I'm not implying that it's your policy. I'm implying that you're announcing an exchange with horrible trading conditions without sharing this information with your users. You are advertising an exchange that is not only not usable with your token, for the most part, but it could cause a considerate loss to anyone who tries to use it.

If I saw the exchange announcement mail, and I deposited my 75 crypterium, I would have lost 46 without anything I can do about it. Just based on the information from your mail, I would have lost 46. Does this sound to you like a good thing ? Do you think that this inspires confidence in your project, or makes the users trust you more ?

Yeah, I could have used IDEX at any time. The problem, however, is that the current situation (exchange with very bad trading conditions, yet it's advertised by the team) points to the fact that the exchanges don't seem to have confidence about the project and it looks like the team is not able to negotiate better exchanges either.

We've been promised HitBTC for months and it turns out it's not usable for most of the users. I understand that you can't change the market as it's in a free fall now so the conditions are bad for new tokens. But if you want more confidence about the project, we should know the bad stuff as well as the good stuff.

For example, we should know what the next exchange is and when will we have it. As well as the minimum trade amount and the withdraw fee.

I've bought 75 tokes as it was the minimum amount and I still can't trade them, 3 months after the ICO. HitBTC requires 100 tokes per trade, which I don't have, and it requires 46 withdraw fee, which is more than half of my total amount.

Not only that but nowhere on the official communication channels does it warn that if you deposit 75 tokens you can't do anything and you can only withdraw them, which will lose you 46.

If I didn't read about that policy here, I would have lost 46 tokens as I would have no other options. This sounds very fishy to me.

I bought the minimum amount and waited 2 months for an exchange. The exchange we have now is not usable for me due to the limit of trading only at 100s and due to the 46 crypterium withdraw fee. So, in effect, I still can't trade them.

I understand that the time for new exchange listings is not great as the whole market is shrinking, but you can imagine why the volume is so low and the price is falling.

This sounds like a joke. Can someone form the team address this situation ? This makes the entire exchange essentially useless for anyone who bought the minimum amount (like me)...

Can I deposit to HitBTC now without a risk of losing them ?

Could someone from the team actually tell us what is going on with the exchanges ? You need to address the exchange problem.

HitBTC is not bad at all for a starting exchange. It's not Binance, but it's 11th in daily volume out of almost 200 exchanges.

I got mine as well.

I plan on holding for at least 3 - 6 months.

There are credit/debit cards that use cryptocurrency, from which you can withdraw real money.

How is Crypterium different ?

So, the app will allow you to spend cryptocurrencies in real stores, without the store doing anything special ?

If this is the case, this will be huge. I wouldn't be surprised if we see $100 per coin in a few months.

It's just amazing how low the market cap is.  Paccoin has 30 times higher market cap and they have nothing, and it's all based on hype. If this gets enough attention, it could easily do a x100.

I bought it at $39 and I don't regret it. I think it can hit $5 billion market cap easily.

Before you think that it's too late, consider that the forums are full of people that thought it's too late to buy Bitcoin at $100.

I have a question:

Due to the fixed rate 1 CRPT = 0.0001 BTC, and the BTC price increase over the past few months, the number of tokens sold is vastly lower than the announced 300 million cap. They raised 3000 BTC, which makes 30 000 000 tokens, maybe 40 000 000 with the bonuses and etc.

How much tokens we we have in circulation total ? The difference between 300 million and 30 million tokens in circulation is massive in terms of potential value per token. 30 million tokens makes it closer to Bitcoin in terms of potential market cap increase.

How much does the team get ? We know that the users will receive 70% of the tokens ,does that mean that the team has 30% over these 30 million (10 million) or 100 million (30% of the total 300 million cap) ?

I'm just trying to calculate how much coins we will have in circulation at the exchange launch day.