While i appreciate discord, if i made my earlier post on discord, i won't be surprised if my account is immediately banned for quote on quote fudding, i have dealt with that on several project discord/telegram. So in the spirit of maintaining transparency/freedom of speech, some of us prefer a public forum with limited censorship.
Instead of posting on Discord what you did here you should just pay a visit and research a bit. Go back to the inception in the threads. I think you may change your mind. I did that and did change my mind. I'm a big time skeptic of ANY coin today. Research erased that. Just a suggestion. and some of us know what open source is and can fork that shit.... |
|
|
|
This is refreshing and I like it, goes to show there can be a fair successful mining community without the usual hidden narrative, advisors, and twitter soy. I fail to see any ulterior motive considering its all in discord, Seb had the interview with Seth months ago. Read the transcript Seb posted in discord of their chat and then take a look at the posted video on the channel. Show them it can work with community hash and support  |
|
|
|
|
so that's it just log on and I can trade your coin..great thanks take my money please
|
|
|
|
|
unsure what could be the issue, I was thinking if your power supply is fed by 110v you're close to/under required wattage for the two, read kernel log when it does go down as for being unable to access possible it's the browser you're using
|
|
|
|
If you find wrongdoing fight back against them; crimeinformation@police.gov.hkThey do business as Supply Leader Limited UNIT 04, BRIGHT WAY TOWER, NO. 33 MONG KOK ROAD, KOWLOON Hong Kong |
|
|
|
Good morning fellows.
best project.... guaranteed savings.... I'm putting all my investments to it.... and I am damn sure I won't loose a single penny.
These comments are fruitless if anything they devaluate public trust in the project stfu and stop your bot like spamming |
|
|
|
What was the reason for rebrand
Copied this from the Discord:Why Rebrand?A fresh two weeks into our blockchain, rebranding was not what we originally had in mind. Unfortunately, it was a needed step to be done and we our satisfied that we’re rebranding while we’re still new. If we were listed on a dozen exchanges and had a huge following, it’d probably be significantly more difficult to perform all the required actions needed. Never-the-less, the question remains. Why? It turns out that the same day we had launched our original announcement thread on Bitcointalk, another group launched an announcement thread for SafeCash a few hours prior. While that’s potentially some crazy coincidence, it was brushed off. Fast-forward a few days before mainnet goes live, we decide to pursue legal counsel in order to trademark the SafeCash brand. A few days after submission of our service mark, we get rejected due to a pending service mark for SafeCash already in the system ( http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4810:ip63xr.3.1) Now does this mean we cannot use the SafeCash name? Absolutely not. It typically takes six or more months for a trademark to be fully registered in the United States (or elsewhere) and there is also a chance that the trademark application could get rejected. Now if the registration goes through, there could be the potentially we could get sued if we’re using the name “SafeCash” for cryptocurrency related activities. As a group, along with some legal counsel, we have decided that the best course of action is not to try to fight with another group about something so trivial as a name. The ideology of going into a legal battle with another startup is negative for both parties financially and towards communities. Hope this answers your question  Good it's posted here for us not a part of your discord group, webpage redirect could have helped you out even if temporary since you already held the domain, good luck with the project |
|
|
|
|
What was the reason for rebrand
|
|
|
|
|
Wait is there even the slightest possibility there is a backdoor to this and the hashrate isn't the hashrate
Dude they are not sending you miners anytime soon, they were probably expecting nothing but a praise
|
|
|
|
I like this concept, I added this in my watch list and for the future investment. Great project and great team.
Good luck
Best regards
Okane Satoshi
6-9-2018 Sat 10:11AM PHT
P# 1097
C# 3
WHO is the team  |
|
|
|
looks good, but why so few tweets November 2017?
Probably because we only launched two weeks ago. He might be referring to space |
|
|
|
MAX SUPPLY: 100 Billion 25% Marketing 10% Development Team 9% New Exchanges  dafuq is this |
|
|
|
This company is a dumpster fire, I had ordered Nano and after exhausting all their excuses of delays for over a month I began legal action to eventually receive a refund..I guess that counts for something, regardless of miner profits as a company I would never go back to them. I guess this being their way to show they actually ship miners by sending you one to get community sentiment play, appreciate what you're doing but personal experience and I cannot be the only one
Could you elaborate more on this? What i've thought is really weird, is that they sent me these two miners to review but they are already sold to other buyers . . so what odd arrangement do they have, they have also changed the next intended recipient once already . . which is also odd Yeah I am definitely concerned on the same note as you, I am not naive enough to think well they sent me one so they will fulfill 100% orders + must be great -- I tried to make that disclaimer in both videos but I'm sure someone will still try to blame me for something lol My order was supposed to ship in May I was in contact with a Jason & Alex on their end and for a few weeks they claimed issue was their local courrier, the order never shipped. Come June first week Alex said if it doesn't ship they refund and so we agreed. Several weeks into June they began ignoring emails and then Jason got involved and said delays are due to "unrecoverable defect" ignored earlier emailed statements from from Alex so no refund. I took it further and pushed some more then they offered me a partial refund, I pressed with legal action and a full refund was issued, basically two month delay and a heck of a fight for my money on their 48th miners. |
|
|
|
|
This company is a dumpster fire, I had ordered Nano and after exhausting all their excuses of delays for over a month I began legal action to eventually receive a refund..I guess that counts for something, regardless of miner profits as a company I would never go back to them. I guess this being their way to show they actually ship miners by sending you one to get community sentiment play, appreciate what you're doing but personal experience and I cannot be the only one
|
|
|
|
Still being mined no PoW Algorithm: Quark Network (GH/s) 1.5876 Coin Supply (DVD) 166713.9865486 |
|
|
|
DAG increases and I believe that 4 GB is not enough. A strange choice in my opinion. In a few years, a 4 GB card will not be able to get anything
In a few years we'll be driving our lambo on the moon no need for 4gb  |
|
|
|
|
How exactly will this be accomplished;
"The RDS Token Coin will be better protected from exchange rate fluctuations compared to other cryptocurrencies, alongside with exchange possibility into other crypto and fiat currencies. It can prove a high level of sustainability and increase investor’s confidence. "
|
|
|
|
|
What makes this project different from Sia
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
