Is this even related to this project or is this a totally different one? This is different project. |
|
|
|
|
pEOS enables private and untraceable transactions onEOS
|
|
|
|
|
This project is suspicious. keep your private key and don't claim your XME until you make sure it's true. Any of the free fork token from Monereos should automatically airdrop to EOS account. But if they require your private key, forget about it. You could expose risk your EOS being stolen.
|
|
|
|
The fact that i see some legendary members actively commenting and possibly still invested in this, is sickening to say the least. Rather than band together and collectively denounce this scam for what it is. Same individuals will probably chase after Rhett's next hype, and use their forum status to lure in newbies for a quick buck with no regards to the impact it might have on the investors. I truly hate the greed in human.
Some people get caught in crypto scams, because of their greed. They didn't pay attention to red flags when looking for more profit, and when lost their money, they blame others. |
|
|
|
EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform.
Sorry but that statement is really weird. Since when does a lot of money mean to succeed? There are tons of examples of crypto projects or startups that have taken a lot of money and ultimately failed. I'm not saying that's what EOS needs to be, but EOS isn't the holy cow as you represent. EOS is still struggling with security problems and flaws. Besides, I can't see that EOS has solved a major problem, unlike Komodo. And Komodo has much less money available, but talented and dedicated developers. Hey my friend, Which holly cow? I just answered the silly talk of KMD investors. The truth is that, KMD is not comparable with EOS in any aspect. There is no end for progression of crypto industry and also there are no projects that can be without bugs. but KMD is the continuation of the BTCD project, which lasted about 5 years. But EOS just a bit over one year old. According to this point and any things that I mentioned earlier any wise person understands that KMD is not comparable to EOS. Judging with expert people! |
|
|
|
You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you
You are right! Because at that time you probably were not familiar with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies! TL;DR : James defined about dozens of crypto projects in year of 2014 and after that. then he was created and offered assets for each project on NXT platform. After that, time passed and no progress was made in the projects. then these assets were undervalued and obliterated, and many investors were affected like me. after that the game has continued until today, by converting it's projects to each other and changing their names and goals. I was also active in the crypto universe at James' NXT times. I also own these assets. These assets were migrated to the KMD chain. Projects like JumblR, Dex and other assets have been functional for a long time now - Dex is even the world leader with over 116000 Atomic Swaps! So I can't understand the statement that many projects were not finished here. For example, SuperNET. |
|
|
|
Look at the state of the EOS and KMD in the crypto world. The rest of the talk is nonsense!   |
|
|
|
Creator there's a lot promised and advertised, buyers were many when EOS was not make until but Komodo created silently and efficiently
ETH also made quietly and also cost $ 1 for a long time, fame began as soon as it bought by the first billionaire
Look at the state of the EOS and KMD in the crypto world. The rest of the talk is nonsense! |
|
|
|
If you think the only difference between EOS and KMD is the time of new block generation, you have a big mistake. EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform. EOS is a well-designed and acclaimed platform which is the result of the experiences that Daniel Larimer has gained from its three previous successful projects. But KMD is made by the JL777 which could not been able to finish even one small project after six years of activity in the Crypto world.
EOS is worse than Komodo in all parameters except block time: 1. No proof of work 2. less bandwidth, 3000 transactions per second against 20000 3. a short address of 12 characters, which can be used to calculate the private key, the recent theft of the cold key from the exchange is proof of that 4. was freezing of the funds of the user with the requirement to explain the origin 5. there is no sense in the coin, Visa is better and Windows is better your determine arguments, does not proof of being better, but the position of each coin in the crypto world is proof it. 1- Position in marketcap 2. The number of main exchanges 3. Daily trading volume 4. The amount of capital attraction 5. The number of investors and users 6. The power of the development team 7. Marketing 8. Number of development projects on the platform 9. and ... |
|
|
|
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Please do not sophistry! I know James since the launch of the BTCD and I was an investor in his several projects that never ended and now I don't have free time to worthless argue with you. history exist to clarify these issues!!! BTCD or BCD ? Basically it was a stupid combination of failures. I use Windows 10 and tried to claim BTCP and BCD. Both with the Electrum version for their blockchains.
I used the same long password for different things - especially my password safe had the same pw as the DASH QT wallet. So after I started the Electrum clients (which I tested before with Defender, SuperAntiSpyware and www.virustotal.com) I had to do a little thing in DASHQT - that was it - the one of the wallets, most likely BCD, spied my password through a keylogger and the hacker had access to everything.
(there is no need to discuss the stupidity of using Win10, same passwords many times, storing 2FA codes in password safes or testing new software on a vulnerable system)https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5080741.msg48476147#msg48476147I don't understand what you mean !!! BTCD was symbol of BitcoinDark. |
|
|
|
You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you
You are right! Because at that time you probably were not familiar with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies! TL;DR : James defined about dozens of crypto projects in year of 2014 and after that. then he was created and offered assets for each project on NXT platform. After that, time passed and no progress was made in the projects. then these assets were undervalued and obliterated, and many investors were affected like me. after that the game has continued until today, by converting it's projects to each other and changing their names and goals. If you are interested to know more, most documents are still available in this forum. Just search a little bit. |
|
|
|
It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.
Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?
Please do not sophistry! I know James since the launch of the BTCD and I was an investor in his several projects that never ended and now I don't have free time to worthless argue with you. history exist to clarify these issues!!! |
|
|
|
this requires trust in delegates, the exchanges is rarely trusted to them, so increased deposit time to 2 hours, only on the Hitbtc deposit in 6 minutes so. A high hashrate is preferable to trust. But many coins do not have a hashrate, but they are credited quickly, I do not understand the logic of exchanges. Why do bad coins without hashrate has a good grow but a good Komodo has bad grow? Why Komodo block in 1 minute, it is fit for neither Dex nor for shopping in the stores, why not do a hulf second like the EOS? Even 15 seconds of ETH is a lot for Dex, I think that's the only reason EOS is a leader. People otherwise understand the high speed of transactions, give them what they like   If you think the only difference between EOS and KMD is the time of new block generation, you have a big mistake. EOS is the most largest and most successful project in the history of cryptocurrencies up to now. EOS has earned more than $ 4 billion in the ICO, which serves the development of this huge platform, and this is the guarantor of the success of this popular platform. EOS is a well-designed and acclaimed platform which is the result of the experiences that Daniel Larimer has gained from its three previous successful projects. But KMD is made by the JL777 which could not been able to finish even one small project after six years of activity in the Crypto world. |
|
|
|
|
Hey devs,
Why coins burning didn't affected on btcp blockchain?
|
|
|
|
OMG what is happening with this coin now we have to take part on low volume exchange to make it list there. Now that time has been arrived we must accept the facts and move to other coins who already have good support. 1- The coin suspicious to be made for pump and dump. 2- The liar, trickster and inefficient development team. 3- Disappointed and afflicted community. 4- Not done roadmap. 5- The uncertainty of major exchanges. This reasons is enough for the death of any crypto project. |
|
|
|
This is the end of the BTCP. thanks to dev team for my obtained free money from this fork!
If you get the coins for free because you hold Bitcoin it doesn't matter, but I think investing in these forks is very risky. Due to the current situation, I think even stupid people will not invest in this coin. |
|
|
|
|
This is the end of the BTCP. thanks to dev team for my obtained free money from this fork!
|
|
|
|
|
what's news about coins burning? how much coins were burned?
16 days have passed from coin burning and no any change is visible on BTCP blockchain!!!
|
|
|
|
Please do not put ZEN in this story, Horizen (ex-ZenCash) has its own TEAM responsible only for Horizen (ZEN). but as far as I know ZEN is a hard fork of ZCL and development by ZCL former developers. Rhett Creighton contributed to many projects including Bitcoin.. I'm not standing in defence, should we call BTC scam? ZEN started chainspliting from ZCL as base for constructing completely new project, this is not secret. And we dont have anything with ZCL developers for a long time now.. So please if you have more questions please join Horizen thread. Thanks! Thanks for your info! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
