Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 07:38:05 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ixcoin - a new Bitcoin fork on: August 11, 2011, 01:32:02 AM
Seriously though, if A LOT of new chains were to start with the variables tweaked a bit wouldn't that just make Bitcoin stronger? You would have hundreds of tiny ones but only one big one. It would be hard for any of the small ones to really steal the market as they would be competing with so many others. Bitcoin has the advantage of being way ahead of the rest.
The problem is building an economy with lots of different chains. It is hard enough for general adoption and agreement on the value of a coin with just one chain and kind of coin. If there are a hundred chains and different people all have a hundred different kinds of virtual coins, how do you know what your coins are worth? It makes the world of exchanges very complicated.
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: global economic collapse on: August 10, 2011, 01:46:55 AM
When this happens bitcoins should be worth alot. While others are sad, and out of money we will be the ones with the valuable currency
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjv-MtGpj2U.
If there is a global economic collapse I think that people will value physical commodities over virtual ones. It is unclear if people will use virtual commodities to remotely exchange physical ones in times of crisis.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What's the quickest way to put funds into MtGox acct? on: August 09, 2011, 05:31:56 AM
FFS it takes like 3 days to transfer from bank acct to Dwolla.  Then another 3 or so days from Dwolla to MtGox.  So nearly a week before the funds actually show up a MtGox account.  Is there a quicker way?
Wiring money would probably be faster, but a lot more expensive.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Make No Mistake: MyBitcoin is NOT Back Up! on: August 05, 2011, 06:00:36 PM
Can I just ask what can be done about this legally ?
Depends. Did you have a legal contract with mybitcoin (or anyone for that matter) that said if you deposit the coins you would get them back? Or... Did you just send your coins to an unknown party and hope that they would be nice and reciprocate by returning your coins? If you don't have a legal contract, perhaps you just gifted your coins away.

If you are looking for legal remedy, you have to specify what laws or contracts were broken. I don't see any laws or contracts broken.

I realize that this might not be the moral answer, but it is probably the legal answer. I am not a lawyer so take it for what it is.
5  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~2700 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, LP, SSL, API, 8 Decimal Payouts and more! on: July 18, 2011, 02:28:43 AM
... any chance on adding the ability to set a local timezone for displaying times?  apparently I cannot subtract 5 hours in my head...  or is it 4 lol
Local timezones would be nice. Displaying the current time in UTC on the block statistics page wouldn't be as nice, but it would be easy... (and helpful)
6  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~2700 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, LP, SSL, API, Full Decimal Payouts and more on: July 10, 2011, 04:40:49 PM
Currently seeing idles on us.btcguild.com. Not seeing idles on useast.btcguild.com. In case it is a DNS caching issue I currently see US as 69.42.216.173 and USEAST as 69.233.243.147
7  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~3000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fees, Long polling, SSL, JSON API, and more on: July 04, 2011, 08:02:25 AM
...  Failover when a sub-pool crashes takes about 4-6 seconds to kick in, meaning you can point your miners at one IP and it will automatically put them at an internal pool. ... 
So it sounds like you are collapsing the multiple names (uswest, useast, uscentral) down to a single address with multiple servers behind it. If this is the case, please post the DNS name of this "one IP" as soon as possible so that we can get our miners reconfigured. (And point that DNS somewhere useful in the meantime... )

Thanks for the hard work.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transaction fees and speeding up transactions on: July 04, 2011, 03:30:43 AM
The point I'm getting at here, in a nutshell, is, can we reliably process transactions less than, say $50, in 5 seconds or less, or not?
It depends on what you mean by "reliably", but if you mean that the merchant has 100% confidence that they will get their money, the answer is no. The protocol just doesn't work that way.
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Metal Engraved Keypair Cards! Coming soon! on: June 29, 2011, 12:27:51 AM
If this is a cute way of publishing your public address as a way to receive BTC then it is cute, maybe even classy.

If it is supposed to be a way to send money, then it is useless (or at least insecure). If the private key is printed on it (as a set of numbers or QR code or whatever) then all I have to do to steal the BTC is look at it, maybe even from a distance. I can use a camera with a telephoto lens and take a picture of you holding your card. As soon as I do this I can spend your BTC.

If you give me one of these as payments for something, I have to run the transaction then and there to make sure the BTC hasn't already been spent. It is not a way to perform a BTC transaction offline. It is not a way to securely hold BTC.

I suppose you can take the private card and keep it out of sight (literally), but why put it on a wallet size card if you aren't going to carry it around?
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ALL of my bitcoins stolen (Around 60) . What the F*CK. on: June 27, 2011, 06:26:29 AM
Quote
And to those that say 'encrypting the wallet will make no difference' do you really think that the devs are thus adding it to pander to 'noobs', but that is secretly known as a waste of time?

Encrypting the wallet will help, but it doesn't solve the problem. When the BitCoin client is running, it will have decrypted your private keys and they will likely be in the memory of your machine. If you have a virus on your machine, that virus can access memory and get your private keys. Even if the devs of BitCoin work real hard and keep your keys encrypted when in memory, at some point they have be decrypted so they can be used. They may only be in memory or machine registers for a few milliseconds, but if you have a smart enough virus, your keys (and your BTC) will be compromised.

Encryption will help when the Bitcoin client is not running and it will protect you against an attack against your backups or other offline copies of your data.

It is essential for security (and the safekeeping of your BTC) that you keep your machine virus and malware free. If you can get to your money on your machine, so can a virus.

There is lots of good advice out there on how to keep your machine virus free, but the basics are to keep your machine patched, use antivirus, and never, ever, under any circumstances, access the Internet when you are logged in with administrative, root, or any other kind of elevated privileges.

In the Windows world turn on auto updates and let them run every day. Use a current, supported version of windows (that means Windows 7, not XP.) The anti-virus software the Microsoft gives out for free is solid - there is no excuse to not have anti-virus protection. Make sure your login account is not an "administrator". Only log in as an administrator when you want to install software.

In the Linux world, make sure you apply security packages from your distribution frequently. Don't run as root.

I don't post this to taunt or scold the OP, just to provide advice to prevent it happening to others.
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to audit the mtgox and mybitoin? on: June 26, 2011, 04:35:27 AM
They would have to publish their wallet addresses (and then anyone can see how much is in the wallets), and then they could send small transaction amounts to a trusted party from each wallet to prove they had control of the wallets.
12  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: GUI mining - updated host address for slush's pool on: June 25, 2011, 06:41:06 AM
Feature Request: in addition to affinity, how about setting process priority? I like to have my miners running at low cpu priority, that way they can they can chug at their fastest speed with -f 1, but I can still use my computer. Currently I have to manually adjust process priority whenever I start a miner, it would be great if guiminer could just set it when it creates the process.
13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can you say GOXED AND POWND AGAIN!~ on: June 25, 2011, 04:42:07 AM
Status tool works for me using my newly reset password. It contains my login history, transaction history, and balances. All information is correct.
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MTGOX opening - GOXED on: June 25, 2011, 04:40:57 AM
I am now able to log into MtGox and see my current balances, login history,  and transaction history. (The claim status site, not the regular site.) My balances are correct. (They are low, but correct.)
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I just got "account claim successful" from Mt Gox - anyone else? on: June 24, 2011, 06:25:51 AM
Was just notified that my account verification was accepted.
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MtGOX Launch . . . postponed on: June 24, 2011, 03:56:49 AM
So has anyone had their account "verified" by MtGox?

I would feel better if MtGox would just say that we have 60k accounts, only 15k of those accounts were active at the time of the crash, 5k of those accounts have started the verification process and we have actually verified 1,245 of the accounts. Verification is going much slower than we expected, we will bring the exchange back on line when we verify 2,000 accounts. We will post the updated stats of how many accounts are verified once a day.

If we had a message such as this, I would be content to wait a bit, but until I hear that someone, anyone, has been notified that their account has been verified, I will be suspicious that none ever will be and that the exchange will never open again.

This would of course suck, and since this is unregulated and there are no legal agreements between users of MtGox and MtGox, it will be too bad, so sad, but at least if it fails, we can move on. I would just like to know if it is going to fail or if there is any real reason for hope.

Edit: 6/24/2011 06:23 I have been notified that my account has been verified. Good news!
17  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DOWNLOAD LINK FOR MTGOX COMPROMISED ACCOUNT CSV on: June 19, 2011, 08:19:21 PM
It's amazing how small the market is really, just 60k people. wtf.
Also interesting is how the number of traders is exploding. I started this about 2 weeks ago and I am at position 28k in the 60k list. Meaning that the number of traders has more then doubled in the last few weeks.
18  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mtgox: Really Fishy Stuff Going On on: June 19, 2011, 06:30:17 PM
Quote
Well I think it's pretty clear we need a $1000-$5000 daily limit... People losing life fortunes in 20 seconds isn't cool. Whoever did this will be lucky to get their money out of dwolla. If I were magical Tux I would probably shut down the transactions.
Why? This how markets work. Buyers and Sellers are matched together. Someone was willing to buy at lot of BTC at pennies and someone else was willing to sell. BTC (like any other commodity) really doesn't have an intrinsic value, it is valued at what people say it is valued at. Since BTC is a new commodity and there are not a lot of people trading in it, the market (all the buyers and sellers) haven't really figured out what it is worth.

This is currently the wild west. The opportunities for reward are great, the risks are extreme. Deal with it. Have fun!
19  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Portland bitcoin users? on: June 16, 2011, 03:35:03 AM
Here in Portland as well. If I am in town I would be happy to join a meet up.
20  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Reason for multiple worker accounts? on: June 14, 2011, 02:48:27 AM
Thanks guys.
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!