Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
The Pool went down a few hours ago. Payouts are stuck for last found block.
|
|
|
Dogecoin thru the roof, will we see a jump in PPS?
Of course. We're at 185% PPS now. Is this a record for the pool?
|
|
|
It's working on S17 and S17Pro. The settings are visible. no need to unlock. I don't have the firmware to send you , but i have lots of miners with this firmware. Kernel Version Linux 4.6.0-xilinx-gff8137b-dirty #25 SMP PREEMPT Fri Nov 23 15:30:52 CST 2018 File System Version Mon Feb 18 20:02:01 CST 2019 CGminer Version 2.0.0
I haven't been able to find that release date in any of the archived S17 firmware sites. Do you know where to find this fixed frequency firmware for S17/S17Pro?
|
|
|
2600W is way to high for air-cooled S9s. If you are looking to overclock those older S9s, I would try 1400W-1600W for the 13.5 model and 1200-1400W for the 11.5 model and see if you are happy with the results of hashrate and efficiency.
Never run more than 90% of the rated power of your PSU by the way.
|
|
|
How long does auto-tuning take? I installed Braiins OS+ on two S9's and let it run all night. I'm getting horrible hashrates and it still says "Tuning individual chips" on both of them. It has been over 10 hours.
Three factors are involved with answering this question. The first is how low or how high is your watt setting the higher the watt setting the longer auto-tuning takes. The second factor is ambient temperature. I have found that if the ambient temperature is cool and controlled the process is much quicker than if the mining environment is a hot garage with little ventilation, for example. The third factor in "how long" is the condition of your individual chips. Since auto-tuning tests and sets levels for each chip, if you have a well used S9 which maybe has lots of debris in the heat sinks, thus damaging some of your chips prematurely, or if you have overclocked your S9 beyond factory specs, it is possible you could have weak or damaged chips which will take longer to tune because they intermittently fail thus causing the auto-tuning to change it's values. What models and how old are the S9s you are tuning? What is the watt value you are putting on the configuration page? "Horrible hashrates": When the tuning process is on it's last steps it begins "tuning individual chips". The hashrate gets significantly lower when this process begins. I have had rigs take 5 hours to auto-tune at 1200W and 2 hours at 900W. If you are overclocking to 1400W or higher I am guessing this will take much longer. There is no set answer to your question. You just need to be patient until "tuning individual chips" changes to stable for all 3 boards. It could be that your S9s might not work as well with auto-tuning as others have reported here.
|
|
|
I measured the watts at the wall with a standard watt meter. The miner is on a 240V line. Model is S9i 14TH.
UPDATE: I've tried two new power settings for auto-tuning. I put in 1200W on the configuration and it auto-tuned to 1111W at 14.8TH which is 75W/TH. I next entered 910W on the configuration page and it auto-tuned to 834W at 12.04TH, about 69.3W/TH. For my S9i-14TH miners, anything above 910W the efficiency starts to go down. I have three S9i-14TH miners running at about 36TH and 2500W. https://pasteboard.co/J7MYtI6.jpg
|
|
|
Have been playing with OS+ tuning. Anybody know the most efficient setting for temperature and power. I can get close to 75w/th with 1050w setting at 75C target temperature. This is with my best hashboards. I find higher temps I start to lose efficiency, but I do like the lower sound around 80C or 85C target temp.
I find with the power setting of 900w or less, efficiency isn't that great.
I chose 900W in the configuration with default fan and temp settings and it auto tuned my S9i to 825W at 11.9TH. That's 69.3 W/TH Another S9i I chose 800W with default fan and temp settings and it auto tuned to 723W at 10.4TH. That's 69.5W/TH. It always ends up with a watt reading lower than what you choose on the configuration page.
|
|
|
Their website seems to be very slow to load.
Has anyone here ever held a FusionSilicon miner in their hands?
Is there any more info about this company?
Their website says the scrypt miner is sold out
|
|
|
I agree about "prove their specs". I have not seen a video showing a demo of this miner from a real person hooking it up to a watt meter,etc, etc. The only images and videos of the miner is from a highly computer-generated promo video that shows an animated fan spinning on the miner. I can't believe that the first "mass" production is finished and sold when there is absolutely zero proof that this miner exists outside of their computer-generated promo. I am not saying it is a scam because no one has lost money over this that I know of. But they probably don't want to "lose face" over their failure to produce a real product from their hype.
|
|
|
sold out but it it hasnt been on sale.. seems legit.
I very much wanted this project to be legit. They are very polite with their correspondences, but they always say to watch their official website for announcements. Then with no announcement whatsoever on their website, they tell me their first "mass" production is sold out. No amount of politeness can put lipstick on this.
|
|
|
Just got this email from them: This is Support Team from TRIPLE-1. Thank you for your inquiry from our official website. Regarding 1st mass-production of “KAMIKAZE”, they've been already sold-out, and we’re conducting final shipment phase. For about the details about next sales plan (Price/Schedule/Distribution program etc), right now we’re considering and arranging it carefully with seeing current market trends (Difficulty) and swing of Crypto prices. Also, depending on the quantity of your order, we might be able to arrange the some stocks of 1st mass-production, In any case, we’re sorry we couldn't answer and guarantee for your request (included DEMO model machines) in this moment. We would keep to make an announcement about our sales activity on our official website and Presses. So, we hope you keep the attention to our updates. = TRIPLE-1 Official Website = http://triple-1.com/en/We appreciate your patience and understanding. Best Regards, ============================ TRIPLE-1 , Inc. Support Team
|
|
|
Ha.. Almost a unanswerable question.. IF the pool hash rate were steady (ie. not changing due to miners coming and going) then you should be able to figure out about what your 5N would be by checking the active users/miners tab and finding miners that have the same or as close to your hash rate AND that have been mining for >100 days.. Unanswerable because if miners leave, your payout may/should/well increase based upon a higher acceptance rate, and obviously lower the higher the hash rate. So in essence, there is no hard and fast number to give you. _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _________ Thanks. I was afraid that might be the answer. I imagine the pool will get more miners and grow again when the difficulty goes down again in 6 days. When that happens the full 5N time should go down considerably. https://btc.com/stats/diff
|
|
|
LOL just 28 hours ago it was about 49 days to full 5N, now it's 105 days and going up as I type. Not a good incentive to attract new miners. I'm wondering, if one started mining a couple days ago at 40 something days to 5N and now 2 days later it's over 100 days to full 5N, which number of days applies to that miner? Fractions.....run the numbers. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. The question is if a miner begins mining at the pool when it takes 50 days to get to full 5N and then 2 days later it now takes a new miner 100 days to get to full 5N, does the first miner still have 50 days to get to full 5N or is it now more? "Fractions.....run the numbers" I'm not sure how to "run the numbers" on this question. Not sure where the 49 hours for full 5N came in at.. Maybe 49 days.. In any case, no, your 5N is based upon up-to-date numbers, so it will vary depending upon your acceptance rate, current pool rate, etc.. Hence the 'run the numbers statement above'.. See your current stats here as posted before: http://www.yourcomputergenie.com/?address=<your addy> Thank you for your reply. Basically you're saying that the time for getting to full 5N is constantly changing. The next logical question is how do you know when you are at full 5N? This stat is not listed in the stat generator above.
|
|
|
LOL just 28 hours ago it was about 49 days to full 5N, now it's 105 days and going up as I type. Not a good incentive to attract new miners. I'm wondering, if one started mining a couple days ago at 40 something days to 5N and now 2 days later it's over 100 days to full 5N, which number of days applies to that miner? Fractions.....run the numbers. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. The question is if a miner begins mining at the pool when it takes 50 days to get to full 5N and then 2 days later it now takes a new miner 100 days to get to full 5N, does the first miner still have 50 days to get to full 5N or is it now more? "Fractions.....run the numbers" I'm not sure how to "run the numbers" on this question.
|
|
|
You're still getting paid for every, single, hash here regardless of ramp up. If anything it's just more BTC per block as we sip some on some good shit. Personally as a hobby miner I'll be able to soak one more month of all four of my units online after that I'll be fine with one s9 LPM and some newpacs running. My gpu's will go offline before those.
Thanks for the info. My S9i LPM miners are running at 14T and 1148 watts. I can hang out here and sip some LaPhroaig and wait for the block.
|
|
|
LOL just 28 hours ago it was about 49 days to full 5N, now it's 105 days and going up as I type. Not a good incentive to attract new miners. I'm wondering, if one started mining a couple days ago at 40 something days to 5N and now 2 days later it's over 100 days to full 5N, which number of days applies to that miner?
|
|
|
How long for a new miner to reach full 5N right now? What is the calculation for this? Thanks
|
|
|
Yes, but with the asicboost feature it should increase in hashrate, right? Is it the 23-10-2018 build LMP version we are talking about? I could give it a try.
According to Bitmain: "Utilizing this technology will be very beneficial for the mining. AsicBoost has the potential to reduce the J/TH cost and increase the total hashrate of the network."
|
|
|
A follow up from the change I did to the main stratum node the other day: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg46326106#msg46326106Recap: The stratum node is 3 servers in a round-robin so if you mine to stratum.kano.is, you randomly get one of the 3. I replaced one of the AWSLS oregon nodes with another provider node in LosAngeles. So now: the old node still has about 20% of the miners on it. i.e. about 300 miners are mining away on the old AWS node that I'm shutting down. So to push those final miners over to one of the current 3 nodes, I'll stop it. As before, no one needs to do anything, it will simply be a failover from the old stratum node to one of the other 3. It will also only affect those ~300 (random) workers on stratum.kano.is I'll do this in 1.5 hrs at 04:00 UTC so any (of the ~300 miners) that fail over due to that, you will know why. Again it is just an immediate failover for ~300 miners, nothing more. I live in Oregon. Will my miners jump to another Oregon node or to the LA node?
|
|
|
I'm trying Fuzzy. I already have 1 block on the acclaim list (davewill2). Just recently retired the Avalon 741s and the last Ebit E9 and added two brand new Dragonmint T1s. I'm up to 94TH now. Oh yes, also overclocking my S9s at 15TH each with modded firmware that has auto tuner configuration which surprisingly keeps the power consumption down. My goal this month is to get one more block on the acclaim list.
would you share what you did with your S9's? EDIT: I see above where you answered someone else with same question. thanks! One thing I forgot to mention, I use the APW5 power supply when I overclock the S9 with this firmware.
|
|
|
|