 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Listsinceblock doesnt seem to be working for me, however, I ran cc.poll on both wallets, but only 1 would finish the other would hang. So far I still see a bunch of unconfirmed transactions according to listtransactions.
Running listunspent I see the following:
wallet 1
Sum unspent = 42.3076
Getbalance = 1042.2348
wallet2
Sum unspent = 210994.93
Getbalance = 210994.93
Attempting to send from wallet 1 continues to fail even when sending 100, however, wallet 2 I was just able to send 50,000.
listsinceblock will work, you just have to give it more time. The wallet may contain up to a million mint transactions, and listsinceblock is paging through all of them. The advantage of listsinceblock is that it will filter out and not display uncleared mint transactions. listtransactions might be easier to use. By default it only gives 10 transactions, and if none of those are cleared, you should ask it to see more until you get all the uncleared transactions. To see more transactions, use listtransactions "" <n> where n is the number of transactions you want to see. listtransactions will show uncleared mint transactions with the category "immature". Any uncleared mint transactions will not clear at this point, so these can be ignored. Are any of the uncleared transactions in category receive? If so, the address of the receive billet is the one you want to use in cc.poll_destination. As a last resort, you can try to stop wallet 1, restart it with the --reset-wallet command line option, then run the listunspent command to see if that changes the wallet balance. As far as the wallets are concerned these each should have been unique to each PC mining separately and then I've since consolidated all the wallet files to a single PC. I've been trying to consolidate the balances as I had quite a few different machines/wallets.
The question was if you at some point copied the wallet file. It is the copying of the wallet file and using it on two machines that can cause the funds to overlap (among other problems). First wallet seems to have a phantom 1,000, but the other wallet is functioning just fine now. I think there may have been a ccnode issue hindering wallet 2, but something funky happened with wallet 1. I am not worried about the 1,000 coins from wallet 1 so don't waste your time unless you are curious to investigate.
I would go ahead and try stopping wallet 1, restarting it with the --reset-wallet command line option, then running the listunspent command to see if that changes the wallet balance. So looks like resetting the wallet is working, but for larger wallets I have to reset it 2-3 times to extract the full balance. The listunspent amount typically doesn't reflect the full getbalance after a single reset. Not sure if its because of the amount of transactions or not waiting long enough, but at least its working. To answer your earlier question I copied the .ccw files from multiple other PC's and I am loading them 1 at a time on this local machine. There is only 1 active wallet at present, but the .ccw files were copied (after other wallets were shutdown). |
|
|
|
Definitely some issues with the sending process. Tried sending 100,000 out of a balance of 212,000 and it says insufficient funds after cutting it up into 25 transactions. Right now seems like sending multiple small chunks manually is working far better than large lump sums.
Noted, thank you. You could try stopping the wallet and then restarting with the command line or configuration file option "--tx-new-billet-wait-sec=180". This will cause the wallet to wait 3 minutes for an expected incoming billet to clear before reporting "Insufficient funds". Seems like no additional billets are being generated / cleared. I should clarify I was trying to consolidate my balances across numerous wallets, however, no amount of waiting appears to remedy the issue. It's been at least 10 min since I attempted sending coins and now even attempting to send 500 coins results in the below message. The wallet appears to have sufficient balance, but there are not enough billets available to construct the transaction. It may be possible to manually solve this problem by sending transactions to yourself to split the wallet balance into more output billets. Error: { "code" : -6, "message" : "Insufficient funds" Our apologies for the difficulties. Does the command "ping" work? Is the console output of ccnode.exe still reporting new blocks (the latest block as of this post is level 203683). If you do a listsinceblock command, how many transactions do you see with zero confirmations and what is the total value of their output billets? (Note that unconfirmed transactions should be listed last, but it may take a while for this command to complete because it filters out and does not report unconfirmed mint transactions that did not earn a mining reward.) How does this compare with the balance reported by getbalance? If you use the command cc.poll_destination <destination/address> to poll the address of one of the unconfirmed transactions, does the transaction then show as cleared after a short time? Does the command listunspent show any unspent billets, and what is their total value compared to the amount you are trying to send? P.S., did you at some point copy the wallet .ccw file to another computer and then start using it at two computers at the same time? If so, then the balances of the two wallets might overlap, and when you send funds from one wallet, it could have made those same funds unspendable in the other wallet. So ping is working fine, block is showing 204721 Listsinceblock doesnt seem to be working for me, however, I ran cc.poll on both wallets, but only 1 would finish the other would hang. So far I still see a bunch of unconfirmed transactions according to listtransactions. Running listunspent I see the following: wallet 1 Sum unspent = 42.3076 Getbalance = 1042.2348 wallet2 Sum unspent = 210994.93 Getbalance = 210994.93 Attempting to send from wallet 1 continues to fail even when sending 100, however, wallet 2 I was just able to send 50,000. As far as the wallets are concerned these each should have been unique to each PC mining separately and then I've since consolidated all the wallet files to a single PC. I've been trying to consolidate the balances as I had quite a few different machines/wallets. ****** update ***** First wallet seems to have a phantom 1,000, but the other wallet is functioning just fine now. I think there may have been a ccnode issue hindering wallet 2, but something funky happened with wallet 1. I am not worried about the 1,000 coins from wallet 1 so don't waste your time unless you are curious to investigate. I'll confirm once I've consolidated all coins, but I think it should be fine from here on out :crossfingers: |
|
|
|
Definitely some issues with the sending process. Tried sending 100,000 out of a balance of 212,000 and it says insufficient funds after cutting it up into 25 transactions. Right now seems like sending multiple small chunks manually is working far better than large lump sums.
Noted, thank you. You could try stopping the wallet and then restarting with the command line or configuration file option "--tx-new-billet-wait-sec=180". This will cause the wallet to wait 3 minutes for an expected incoming billet to clear before reporting "Insufficient funds". Seems like no additional billets are being generated / cleared. I should clarify I was trying to consolidate my balances across numerous wallets, however, no amount of waiting appears to remedy the issue. It's been at least 10 min since I attempted sending coins and now even attempting to send 500 coins results in the below message. The wallet appears to have sufficient balance, but there are not enough billets available to construct the transaction. It may be possible to manually solve this problem by sending transactions to yourself to split the wallet balance into more output billets. Error: { "code" : -6, "message" : "Insufficient funds" |
|
|
|
|
Definitely some issues with the sending process. Tried sending 100,000 out of a balance of 212,000 and it says insufficient funds after cutting it up into 25 transactions. Right now seems like sending multiple small chunks manually is working far better than large lump sums.
|
|
|
|
|
CredaCash,
Could you please shoot me a DM? I wanted to chat with you privately, but I am unable to do so since you prohibit DM's from new users.
Thank you!
edit: woops! Just realized your account was still newbie status too....just changed my settings to allow messages.
|
|
|
|
Seems everything confusing on MCT+/MCTP coin.
Today is 12.11.18 (the swap beginning time) but neihter swap has began nor any satisfied explanation.
Ony They say " we need to test a new build of the wallet and chain." bla bla.
Why did not you tested that things passing 1 WHOLE week.
And also no one knows how the swap will implemented or what will happen after swap. Even the mods on discord.
I am afraid that nothing is good for MCTP for now..
You are clearly not keeping up with the Discord because a full explaination is there. Up until today everything on the new chain seems to have been okay. However, today they started having a problem with the staking feature in some aspect. On top of this Andrew is very ill and needing rest. I personally trust this team completely and am sure we will be all set to launch new chain in just a few days. I know this is hard given that every coin/project that does pull an exit scheme sounds exactly like this, all evidence points towards the fact that we are being told the truth and that this is just bad timing and bad luck. If you wanna sell I will give you 305 sats for every MCT you've got, haha. Just please try to relax and lets sit back and see what happens over the next couple days. Did they shared any screenshot about new chain, new wallet? NO. And any screenshot about having problem about what? NO. So there are several options like someone is lying or they can NOT do this work. That discord..They never want any negative comments there and if you write any negative comment they warn u not write like that or u will be banned. So everyone in there writing only positive comments like an adulatory. ("like good morning, we trust you, no problem we can wait bla bla" no criticism about project or they know that they will be banned) And one more thing they always say "there are 100s of new coins wating to be listed on the platform bla bla.." Which coin? Any example? NO. No screenshot about new chain, new wallet, no waiting new coins. All lie. In the beginning i believed this team and tried to support them and you can read my ideas previous pages and on that discord. But since they keep lying and banned me that idiot discord i am no longer trust them. And when things go wrong for them there is always an unwell person especially Andrew (the same happen again when they delay the swap last time) You believe them so blind, you can believe what they say without showing evidence. Now you are freaking out again Saphire. Please calm down. We are sorry we missed a deadline, but it happens. Don't worry. Eeeh, whatever. Hey ssiver, you and I can buy their MCT for real cheap then 🤣🤣😁😁 I wrote here much about the absence of plans and wanted them proofs about their work but u only say "Eeeh, whatever." Hah go and buy so much cheap coins and hold them forever. Because there will not be a swap foreever. They will go on delaying that date. Swap details have been officially released. We'll get a formal post from the MCT team on here in the next day or two. |
|
|
|
|
If you buy this coin - you are a moron.
|
|
|
|
it's great that on the basis of one project in the course of development different platforms will function. sorry, I did not really understand what would be the first? and pocheiu in the road map, I did not see the exact dates? when will the charity fund function? crowdshooting platform?
According to discord they are working on the talent pool platform. |
|
|
|
|
Block rewards are set to increase by 10x (.2 to 2) in approx 25 hours. This is the time to start mining.
|
|
|
|
|
