Awesome gadget, thanks!

Is the feature of listing multiple wallet addresses (separated by |) still working? I tried with v4.4 with 5 addresses. Sometimes it seems to retrieve the balance in only the first address instead of their sum, and other times it just displays "N/A".

(Looking at Settings.js lines 185-186, the blockchainAddr setting gets saved as the |-separated list of addresses. I could not find any corresponding logic in MyBitcoins.js to split this list of addresses by | and query them separately; lines 502-504 seem to query it directly with the |-concatenated list of addresses.)

EDIT: Looks like their API documentation (https://www.blockchain.info/api/q) says |-separated addresses should be supported, but it actually returns Invalid Bitcoin Address when I curl it.

EDIT EDIT: Whoa, apparently ,-separating the addresses works!

Just go for Eclipse Mining Consortium: https://eclipsemc.com. The forum page is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=16385.0

I had made a comparison spreadsheet of the existing "good" PPS pools some time ago. EclipseMC is still the winner. http://1drv.ms/1cbd4Xa

Pretty sure GHash.io is PPLNSG (Pay Per Last N Share Groups) at 0%, not PPS (Pay Per Share).

As for myself, I'm on EclipseMC because it offers PPS and I want the most stability / peace of mind I can get. But I do have GHash.io set up as a failover pool.

If you end up finding some seller at that price let me know .... would love to buy all that I can afford at that price!

Me too ... Repeatedly getting 0GH/s alerts on the "Miner Status" Android app.

Ouch! All four servers overloaded according to the home page.

This Mt.Gox fiasco is actually turning out in my favour. There are several escrow-based Bitcoin exchange sites (e.g. BitBargain, Localbitcoins, etc.) where many sellers set their asking prices based on the Mt.Gox exchange rate --- which has plummeted and has made it easy for me to buy Bitcoins at these places.

Obviously Mt.Gox-independent exchanges like BTC-e and BitStamp still have high and stable selling prices.

Arbitrage!

PPS at 1% (where pool must credit miners as difficulty-1 shares are submitted, regardless of whether an actual block at current difficulty is found or not) is even riskier than Proportional or PPLNS[G] (where pool credits miners only when block is actually found at current difficulty).

That is the price only at Mt.Gox, for the very simple reason that people are unwilling to buy BTC there knowing they will be prevented by Mt.Gox from withdrawing it.

Prices are relatively OK in other exchanges.

Hi, really love this pool! 

Just one question -- the "PPS Rate" shown in the "More Stats" popup ... is that before or after subtracting the 5% pool fee?

I want payout stability, at least in the short term. Sorry but I'm just being selfish.

PPS is the still the best payout scheme for this. Here's a comparison I made of currently-active PPS pools payouts. http://1drv.ms/1cbd4Xa

I've moved to EclipseMC permanently, as it offers PPS so I get paid for my work whether it manages to make blocks or not.

Address: 1my74KSE9E5VDzDBs6kQfJX3a5ELY7VJn
Game: red
Multiplier: x4

Sorry for the delay, just made it out of newbie mode. Thanks!

Anything that is similar but differs by one vowel, e.g.:
1 botcoin
1 betcoin
1 batcoin

This may be happening because your Internet connection isn't fast enough to handle the high rate of share submissions. Two ways to improve this situation:

• Make sure you use the Stratum protocol to connect to your pool over the Internet, and not the older, less-efficient "getwork" protocol. If your mining device does not support Stratum then run a Stratum proxy (bfgminer or mining_proxy) on your PC and point your mining device at it.
• The pool you are mining in may have a setting to adjust the difficulty on your miner, or it may auto-adjust it (a.k.a. "vardiff"). Try increasing the difficulty for your mining device the rate of share submissions is decreased to a more manageable level.