Crazy how low the negative feedback is about this tremendous scam project in here. Since Mr. Slusnys is already a free man again (with an active preliminary proceeding though)...

Normally you would expect some big investors to get really angry and be after this beardy datacenter expert clown.

That's exactly what I'm assuming too. It all comes back to the unlocking of the SVD-Token about 3 hours before the officially announced start of the listing at 20:00 CEST. And that has been in total control of Savedroid's devs and that's why they are fully responsible for the aftermath.

They can't srsly expect, that the community is going to tolerate one failure after another and keeps calm another few months and potential new investors honor this bullshit.

Since this failure disadvantages the investors again there can only be one fair, honest and final solution:

REFUND all investors who apply for it! I would even agree to a disclaimer of some single-digit % of my investment just to end this nightmare as fast as possible and for the reason to go on with just a black eye.

tobson srsly, what's that whole action supposed to be?

Savedroid unlocked the SVD Token about 3 hours before the official announced start. That was savedroid's responsibility and in their control.

In the latest AMA sessions, the CEO told us, the unlocking would happen right at the start of the listing about 20:00 CEST.

Afterwards the price dumps immediately and that together with the too early listing at IDEX and TIDEX is probably the reason, HitBTC canceled the listing because they would have sticked to the agreement of a listing at 20:00 CEST. Savedroid now might have annoyed the only bigger Exchange, which was cooperative to list that token  .

All in all that was the next total fail after the failed Exit-Scam-PR-Gag and will further damage the reputation of savedroid and the project, lowers the value of the token again and therefore disadvantages the investors.

You must be a bunch of amateurs...just refund the investors, which apply for it.

This all is a big fat joke, which starts to become more and more serious and personal.  

@ NakiRR

Where is this "rule", which makes it impossible to refund investors, coming from?

If until today they haven't spent a lot of the funds for their project, it should still be available on their wallets. And if they have full access to it, they theoretically could refund investors maybe by about 90%...i don't get it where the problem is.

Still waiting for an official giving a statement to this.

I have to repeat myself! And i don't care whether my proposal suits savedroid's plans (since they don't even show any reaction to it). They fooled their community and investors in a dramatic manner. By just continueing the way they do right now (playing for time with the hope everything calms down and will be forgotten), they make things even worse.

So.....

Refund investors! Every investor should have the possibility to apply for a refund...

I think until now only a small part of the funds has been already spent for project related things, so it should be possible to refund an investor by his application for almost 100% by return of his SVD Tokens.

This is the only honorable and legitimate way to handle this situation.

It would be the proof of a good will and would represent a true excuse by savedroid and its team. This way savedroid takes full responsibility for its actions and decisions and has at least the chance to regain trust.


Maybe someone can initiate a petition/survey about a possible refund and help spreading it among all investors ?

There is another option:

Refund investors! Every investor should have the possibility to apply for a refund...

I think until now only a small part of the funds has been already spent for project related things, so it should be possible to refund an investor by his application for almost 100% by return of his SVD Tokens.

This is the only honorable and legitimate way to handle this situation.

It would be the proof of a good will and would represent a true excuse by savedroid and its team. This way savedroid takes full responsibility for its actions and decisions and has at least the chance to regain trust.


Maybe someone can initiate a petition/survey about a possible refund and help spreading it among all investors ?

Newest E-Mail:

VOTE SVD ON HADAX AND EARN FREE SVD   

Dear savedroider,

You can​​​​​ earn free tokens by getting SVD to the Top 3 (Europe & Australia edition) on Huobi Pro's HADAX.

Don't miss this 10,000,000 SVD = 100,000 Euro airdrop!

------------

If this token will be worth anything above zero at the exchanges, they now plan to even drag it down more by airdroping another 10mio SVDs.

Srsly refund all the investors (by their wish and application for it), which got cheated on their investment by the negative effects of Savedroids lousy PR gag, and therefore have all the rights to be disappointed.

Finally thank you for the response, which -although it's not what i was hoping/expecting- i'm going to accept.

There still remains a insipid aftertaste, because the disadvantage is very hard for all of your early supporters/investors.

Nevertheless i wish the project all the best and i stay confident.

For several days now, still no reaction/response to my posts from minerone.io  

Seriously, i think that's no appropiate way to handle this annoying inconvenience, which hits early investors very hard.

When i did an early FIAT investment with 35% bonus, this ROI Calculator indicated about factor 7 (x7) for 3 years.
Today it shows about factor 6,5.

Since as an early investor i received about 50% less MiO tokens than an invest today would give me, this calculator is more of a funny estimator with very positive assumption at every time.

Still hoping for a goodwill action, to compensate the disadvantage of early supporters/investors (additional free MiO Tokens for early investors, who got hit hard by the drop of Ethereum-rate due to the fact, Miner One doesn't calculate the price of MiO in FIAT, a currency by the way they have to use for buying hardware, pay for electricity etc.).

As they will probably never sell all available tokens, and have to burn alot of them in the end for sure, it shouldn't be a problem at all to increase the amount of MIO tokens of early investors.

The total possible monthly payouts will be spreaded to all MIO-token holders according to the amount of MIO they have. So if there would be a compensation for early (esp. FIAT) investors, that would just mean, that the late investors get "less" for their investment, than they actually would get right now.

I think that would be a fair solution for a community like this.

I would get about 2000 MIOs more (that's about 40%) if i would have done my investment today with 15% discount, instead of investments with 35% and 30% discount.

That's what i'm irritated about, and i think it's not fair at all and should be considered by miner one.

@ pokachou

Sending them back to miner one should be possible, right?

But in any case, that's why a good solution would be, to just grant every affected member an additonal appropiate amount of MIO tokens for compensation purposes.

@ minerone.io

Looking forward to your cooperative response.

@ minerone.io

I understand it's an aggravating topic for miner one, but i still wait for a statement. Ignoring my posts isn't a reputable handling of this issue.

Let's hope the founders acknowledge this and start some kind of goodwill action. Refunding early FIAT investors isn't necessary, but it would be very easy to increase their MIO balance with a decent amount of MIO, so the disadvantage of the early investment decreases or becomes close to zero.

Please forward this issue to the founders, because i still believe in their seriosity and customer focus.

It's a pity that my posts need to be picked up/exploited by apparently sympathisers/members of competitive projects.

@ minerone.io

Can you forward this thoughts to the founders? I think there are a lot of early investors, who don't feel very happy about the fact, they subsidize investors which joined the community afterwards in such a remarkable way and to their own disadvantage.

As an early investor, I can understand pinionless and i'm irritated too. It's even worse if you invested with FIAT...

Nowadays FIAT is still more reliable than crypto and therefore helps the whole project (more planning reliability/stability due to less volatility). But the counter draw is, FIAT investors get treated in a way, which makes their investment worth less than an investment with crypto over the last weeks. If it would just have been some per cent, i think almost nobody would complain...but up to about 60 per cent is a punch in the face of every early FIAT investor  .

It would be a fair and reasonable reaction of the miner one team, to acknowledge this fact and balance it in an appropiate way within a goodwill action 

Just a suggestion:

What about refunding these people, deleting all MIOs of their accounts, and then they can decide to invest again for the conditions of today?