 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
the client really must to have a built-in function to ignore nodes versions lower than it's own version. my version 0.6.1 still connects to some 4.9 nodes, wtf. I have to manually go removing them and blacklisting them
+1 |
|
|
|
thank you so it is not 0.7.0e |
|
|
|
|
What version we yhave now can't follow
|
|
|
|
do you have a whitepaper - i would love to read about the economic model. fixing and almost fixing exchange rates is one of the most complicated issues in economics
I agree. This is the most interesting part of emunie and I'd like to know more. For me this is what makes or breaks emunie. +1 |
|
|
|
It is open beta day remember, lots of load and traffic today. Contrary to the wild and contradictory claims in this thread, eMunie is not dead!
wah don't be a crybaby, NXT was attacked for weeks!part of the game if you can't stand the heat, blah blah |
|
|
|
NXT community, Please think. Every time there is a dicision to be made we tend to hold on to CfB and help us out, 9 out of 10 times he is telling us, the community has to decide. One day CfB will be gone any idea how we gonna do it then. Who will tricker this or that event organize polls or votings etc.. My question is… Do we need some sort of foundation (purely administrative) if so how would be the structure: can we achieve that in a decentralized way? - Chairman (multisig) - Secretary (multisig) - PR - TO (technical officer) - DEV - Member(multisig) - Member - Member Maybe some will kill me now but have to bring it up we cant circle arround it forever, what are the alternatives? We need some sort of plan till April and yes CfB you can put me on ignore  Pin This was profetic } |
|
|
|
|
Vicurex is adding NXT very soon!(days)
|
|
|
|
aparently you and Daniel go a long way  let me guess you are one of the founders having a seat in the foundation doing all the work for free you poor fellow. untill source code is open it is a scam just like NXT and all other closed sourced coins Its not only that the source is open it is even obfuscated. I wonder where all them new eMunie will come from and most of all where do they go to... eMunie is runned by few people not more then 10, they are the only ones that actualy will get rich on other peoples money. (there are only 30 active beta testers at most) you can all see for yourselves So... what is eMunie gonna do with 800 BTC pre-sales? NXT is open source. |
|
|
|
Found static byte[] convert(String string) and static String convert(byte[] bytes) ineffictive. Need I suggest some solutions (like Apache Commons  )? Edit: nevermind. I'm too strict this evening... I don't think this developer has even heard of Apache commons. I mean, it is obvious that he doesn't even know how to use a java package.  mister ixcoin alternative for bitcoin roflmao iXcoin - The First Alternative to Bitcoin. Been around since 2011, price has been going up since 2012. Extremely secure, hash rate about 1/4th of Bitcoin. Read the statistics page here: www.ixcoin.co |
|
|
|
While lurking for injected bugs, I found that some parts of Nxt code makes my eyes bleed. With hope that I have enough programming skills (probably better, than my runglish ), I'm starting this thread. Not for bounty, but for better quality (but donations welcome, as usual ). First of all, thanks to IntelliJ IDEA code analysis, I see a lot of syncronized with potentially wrong usage. Static variables like peers, blocks, accounts, users are not final. They are initialized at start, so it is not a big flaw right now, but who knows about future. When I look more deeply in syncronizations, I see a lot of places, where author get content of such global collection and then sync on it, but not sync on collection itself. Example: Block.analyse() method:
Account generatorAccount = accounts.get(Account.getId(generatorPublicKey));
synchronized (generatorAccount) {
generatorAccount.setBalance(generatorAccount.balance + totalFee * 100L);
generatorAccount.setUnconfirmedBalance(generatorAccount.unconfirmedBalance + totalFee * 100L);
} While in some places such usage may be safe, I think it's very bad practice anyway. More to come... The author did not even bother to run the code through static code analysis. Also, where the hell are the JUnit tests? How can anyone expect this kind of code to be used to handle their currency? I do not think that this should be taken here as an opportunity to insult the developer. Please, show more humility for the work of others, even if you dont like the project. This code is supposed to secure the currency that people own, so I expect top notch software development best practices, not work that looks like it came out of a high school coding project. I am teling you like it is, if you can't handle the truth then so be it. hey mister big mouth, if its not safe break it right now or stfu |
|
|
|
No, its a scamcoin
Here is for serious and smartpeople please you go to the NXT is a scam topic. thank you |
|
|
|
the question is as simple as the answer.
should btc-e list NXT to the exchange
of course they should ! |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
don't you like my name?
go go go NXT
13653026155985999964
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
