 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
JackIT, do you have performed tests based on different components of the GPUs?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
As of memory is not really a bottleneck for X16r, it shouldn't be noticeable. There is no DAG things in X16r so memory capacity doesn't impact performance (like it does/did with ETH). You will probably see different result if you cannot apply same OC on both cards (due to opposite ASIC quality). Great! Thanks for the info, it is very helpful. I have to read more about the algos. |
|
|
|
Enemy Ver 1.10 (Public)https://mega.nz/#!8bJTVAAL!o6a6CdiqBnQ4jbEQae0yuW4F3JDf24Ny7ieWjKjTXJwFor Windows (Cuda 9.1)zealot/enemy-1.10 (z-enemy) From: Dk & Enemy - Fixed compatibility issues that resulted in performance degradation with some non-yiimp pools. Now you'll see the expected hashrate on them (suprnova). - Kernels speed improvements : (1.09b vs 1.10) +1-2% total (all algos) and +1-2% for x16r &x16s. - Support & impove new algo : Tribus (-a tribus) , recommended intensity for Tribus 20-21. +5% speed vs 1.09b ( Service release) For Linux ( HiveOS & Ubuntu ) Cuda 8.0 https://mega.nz/#!5HoHxSYR!YgTmDLTipVSb6HEUplrV_FHFLOFDOWUuSg69kFTDrY8 Cuda 9.0 https://mega.nz/#!YGIFXZiT!cLA8C4G6Qk79MzlnQSWcI5YCMSY8Q6eLBweG92lFf-I Cuda 9.1 https://mega.nz/#!gf4ACYjb!LKIzQitOUBi6Xn7PZ0M-HfrXqP0krNMRw5nkRfkJqyY Is this going to work for Win10? |
|
|
|
|
JackIT, do you have performed tests based on different components of the GPUs?
I want to know the result on how performs one and the same technology but with different specifications.
And if anyone can perform such test, that would be very helpful.
2 GPUs, with different specifications:
Dual GTX1060-O3G Dual GTX1060-O6G
GPU/Boost: 1594MHz/1809MHz 1594MHz/1809MHz
RAM: 3GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz 6GB GDDR5/192bit 8008MHz
* Obviously, the GPU/Boost is the same for both GPUs, would that mean same speed of mining?
* If all parameters are identical with exception of the RAM (3GB & 6GB), how would that reflect to the mining?
|
|
|
|
Mega Like for this topic!
However, im concerned about efficiency per Watt, try with 65% ~ 80%PL
Why is that important? As long as it's profitable, I mine at 100 pl because otherwise I don't earn as much as I could. Why leave capacity unused, even if it is somewhat less profitable above 80 pl... Some people like to factor in cost in electricity. But if that coin goes from $0.05 to $10, that cost savings actually hurts you. I'm with you on running it at most optimal point of hash rate instead of hash per kwh. But for each there own, so I ain't bashing opinions on savings. Well, a lot of home miner are limited global power wise more than investment wise, so it can make sense to have best efficiency per card. Absolutely agree! Depending on the electricity cost, everyone should decide for his rigs what is best - max power or balanced Hash/Kwh. The difference between $0.1/KwH and $1/KwH is kinda bothering when looking for profit. |
|
|
|
|
Let's not attack the devs, they may be very busy atm. Let's see if they answer.
@Devs, could we have some timeline of the 4 waves you describe? We really need some more information how things work.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi team, this project seems promising. Are there any planned bounties?
|
|
|
|
Bounty program coming up soon, pm me if interested to help out
How may I help? P.P. Can't sent PM. |
|
|
|
just now all the coins have come
I am mining RVN and reading this is kinda bothering. Is there any problem with coin transfer, or it is simply a delay? Has anyone contacted the developers about that? |
|
|
|
In mining, it is in third place and the price has grown to $ 40, but now it has fallen to 20.
I think together with the growth of bitcoin and the ЕТС should grow.
But in fact the coin is useless.
Yes instead buying ETC maybe you should buy ETH. ETH is the main coin with good project and usefull. If ETC boom it must be, because of ethereum so why not buy the main coin instead. This is great advice, indeed. The volatility of ETH is higher than ETC, therefore the profit is higher in one and the same movement. As we can notice on the ETC trend, it is quite slower. And support the fact that when BTC climbs up again, ETC and ETH and the alt coins price will get higher  |
|
|
|
Of course, in comparison with last year, now crypto-currencies are experiencing not the best period. But think about it, in 2017, bitcoin cost$ 1000, only at the end of the year it struck us with its heights. Bitcoin still shows growth for the year by 800%. I think it's too early to quit the game. Crypto-currencies will gain enormous popularity.
Absolutely agree! It hasn't yet become popular, the usage of crypto currency. The cryptocurrency market is the same as the financial market. There are fluctuations of course, that can be very beneficial or harmful, depending on the investment. I would like to know what will happen if there are cryptocurrencies that are not dependable on the BTC? What would then happen? |
|
|
|
|
