Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:14:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
1  Economy / Securities / Re: Diamond Circle - Information memorandum - Ticker 'XDC' - Cryptostocks.com on: February 25, 2014, 07:09:53 AM
Well, I was wrong about the trolls. Here is a meaningful update to another successfully polluted bitcointalk thread:

http://us7.campaign-archive2.com/?u=fd642ef4ad55c334d6c22c6ff&id=d744f6bbe7&e=[UNIQID]

"The DC ATM solution has been partnered with Touchmate an international Kiosk and ATM builder , with over 12 years experience and thousands of installations across the globe. Touchmate is located in both the USA and Australia."

Looking at a pic of an angle iron frame with a flatscreen & ATM guts, all on a garage bay floor, made me wonder:  Who is this established international Touchmate?  

Google search for "Touchmate ATM" net me exactly ... zero results.

Such established.
Very ATM.
So 12 years.
Wow.
2  Economy / Securities / Re: Diamond Circle - Information memorandum - Ticker 'XDC' - Cryptostocks.com on: February 22, 2014, 02:43:41 AM
i see you are right.

so.......


who again is Trent Churchill?

...
......
..........

I can personally assure everyone, Trent Churchill has no involvement with Diamond Circle.

oh yeah, he doesnt have shit to do with this still.

and btw, if the sumbitch was taking meth, if hes past it now, who the fuck is anyone to judge him?
unless he's in the process of taking your fucking hubcaps off your car for a goddamned hit, i think he should be a non fucking issue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill‎

again, back to the discussion at hand.

So hows about them Yankees? (yankees being Diamond Circle)

To answer a few of your questions:

1.  Cars with hubcaps are for poor people.  Anyone stealing hubcaps in this day and age is not just drug-addled, but hopelessly, pathologically stupid.

2.  Since you can't tell the difference between meth and pot, your opinions are unlikely to matter to anyone, least of all me.

No hard feelings, bro.  Keep those hubcaps clean.
3  Economy / Securities / Re: Diamond Circle - Information memorandum - Ticker 'XDC' - Cryptostocks.com on: February 21, 2014, 11:03:07 PM
...
(brief aside.. i think ppl truly forget marijuana is legal many places now, esp for medical conditions. even if the man did smoke pot, what in the flying blue fuck does that have to do with his expertise/professionalism?  Huh our goddamn president smoked pot!  Shocked  grow up ppl.  Roll Eyes)
...

D00d, you got "pothead" and "methhead meth dealer" mixed up.

Trent Churchill – Director
...
I was talking to someone in Brisbane who has dealt with Trent before is it true he was a meth head and was selling meth on SR and was previously running a Mining OP where he ripped alot of people off and also threaten my contacts family and his kids? I just want to confirm its the right Trent Churchill.
4  Economy / Securities / Re: [IPVO] [Multiple Exchanges] Neo & Bee - LMB Holdings on: February 20, 2014, 11:52:29 PM
^If ever.
5  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: February 20, 2014, 12:01:43 AM
When there's nothing to cool, air works just fine Smiley
6  Other / Off-topic / Re: More threats towards ACtM CEO. on: February 19, 2014, 08:37:38 PM
OH NOES!  Super serous shit!

7  Economy / Securities / Re: [QUINTO] IPO on cryptostocks on: February 19, 2014, 04:52:29 PM

Then STFU Smiley
8  Economy / Securities / Re: [QUINTO] IPO on cryptostocks on: February 19, 2014, 04:32:56 PM
It never ceases to amazing me how dumb and vicious people can be.
...

Lurk moar.
9  Economy / Securities / Re: ActiveMining/Labcoin: a comparison on: February 16, 2014, 02:30:24 PM
You're forgetting the main difference between Labcoin & Active Mining:  Labcoin never stopped his suckers from trading, Ken did.
So no chance of anyone but Ken unloading anything at any price.
10  Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process on: February 16, 2014, 02:09:15 PM
@SebastianJu:  Wrong thread.
You're thinking of Active Mining, the other honest business that failed.
11  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 15, 2014, 11:53:12 AM
I work for the government ... They are scared shitless of it for reasons we all know as seasoned bitcoiners. ...

Ready for more seasoning?


12  Economy / Securities / Re: [alcurEX] Cryptocurrency Exchange IPO - 50% To public shareholders - Read more on: February 15, 2014, 12:29:52 AM
OP, try for more fonts and text effects.  I'm loving the mid-90s "just pirated my first copy of Photoshop" look.

13  Economy / Securities / Re: [Minershare.net] KnC Neptune Miner #1 batch shares, $4/GHs, No hidden fees on: February 14, 2014, 11:32:38 PM
...
Dude must be tokin' on Dank and Matt Carson's Denver home grown shit, for he forgot how to spell his name:

No results found for "Aleks Juhani Mikhailov".

Hiya.
English spelling of Russian names is phonetic, the original spelling is Cyrillic.  (So try alternate spellings)  The middle name, if the guy is Russian (last name), is always a patronymic, which "Juhani" ain't.
That said, i'm pretty sure it's a fake name, no matter how you spell it or what the middle name is.
14  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 08:28:56 PM
...and realize that ALL OF YOU should be contacting the authorities and demanding ken refund your deposit value at the beginning...

*facepalm* The delusional powers are strong in you...

Luckily either someone already reported Ken to the authorities, or Ken is lying.  Both result in the same outcome for Active Mining investors -- poverty Undecided
15  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 05:53:00 PM
...I think everyone understood this to be the wild west. That doesn't mean all issuers are scammers -- there have been BTC security success stories.

Sure.
There have been scratch ticket lottery success stories too.  Which doesn't mean investing in scratch tickets to make money is smart.
It's not.

Of course, if by "success stories" you mean traders making money, that has little to do with issuers not scamming.  Many people made serious coin trading Labcoin, which "investors" are beginning to acknowledge is a scam.
So what are you trying to say? That there are zero bona fide, worthwhile investments in the BTC space?

I'm not trying to say anything other than what I have said.  I wish I could dumb it down further, but there's only so much one can do.
Sometimes reading a passage several times brings better understanding, so maybe give that a shot?

*In case the simple logic of "The issuer needs not be a scammer for you to lose money" escapes you, that's also true.

Anyhow, we've strayed into semantic irrelevancy.  As an investor, you shouldn't care whether Ken will lose your money due to ill intent or honest American stupidity.
The main takeaway here is your money's gone, either way.
16  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 05:36:17 PM
...I think everyone understood this to be the wild west. That doesn't mean all issuers are scammers -- there have been BTC security success stories.

Sure.
There have been scratch ticket lottery success stories too.  Which doesn't mean investing in scratch tickets to make money is smart.
It's not.

Of course, if by "success stories" you mean traders making money, that has little to do with issuers not scamming.  Many people made serious coin trading Labcoin, which "investors" are beginning to acknowledge is a scam.
17  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 04:45:02 PM
...
The board is legit, it IS for bitfury chips and I know the 55nm chips will have a similar packaging.

I am also a bit wondering how you can know that 11mmx11mm chips are similar than 7mmx7mm chips?

BFL, Bitfury.   49mm2, 121mm2.  Heat dissipation?  FUD!  Don't sweat the details.
Join Bargraphics' Kool-Aid Fanciers Club aka #actm, and wait for the magic beans to sprout.

*The boards also have no voltage converters (to step down 12V to the voltage needed by the chips).  Only Bitfury chips could be daisy-chained.
The cooling is also going to be pretty lulzy -- Bitfury chips are currently the best J/GH performers, and each chip hashes a small fraction of what Ken claims his 55nm chips will hash.  Meaning more heat needs to be dissipated.

TL;DR:  Ken doesn't understand shit, Bar is simply talking shit.
18  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 02:49:01 PM
@Bargraphic:  ROFL!
19  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 02:25:31 PM
Why are we over analyzing pictures of a chip that we know hasn't been spun yet.

Ken has said on multiple occasions that they opted to not go for a small sample run and instead have placed a full order. That schedule has been released you know there are no chips yet so why all of the concern over what must be some stock photo.

Because

...
This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips.  ...

If Ken said it was a stock image, it would have ended right there.
He didn't - he said the board was made by the "stealth startup" that he allegedly bought.

But he fucked up, not knowing dick about electronics in general, and ASICs in particular.

The chips aren't BFL, they're BitFury.  Ken can't even lie right.

If Ken actually had engineers to advise him, he wouldn't make such laughable blunders.  The guy is not just a scammer, he's an incompetent scammer.
20  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 14, 2014, 11:37:56 AM
Wow can no one see that the image of the board and chips that is posted that you guys are so wildly claiming as that pic quality don't exist any more is of a smaller image BLOWN up to a Very much larger scale and that is why the Quality of the image was so drastically reduced
...

If anyone cares to see the True clear image then check out the Chip Sale link and you can see the UN-blurred Image
BYE BYE

Hey, thanks.

Didn't see that one.  This one makes it perfectly clear that Ken is lying like a rug.



This is a BitFury chip (see inset image, everything *down to the package markings* matches).
The board also has no voltage regulation, probably going for the daisy chain power scheme possible with BitFury chips.  That had high failure rates and was abandoned AFAIK, but i haven't followed it, so not sure.  

Ken's total ignorance in electronics really hobbles his lying here.

0/10.  Do.Not.Want.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!