Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Can someone ELI5 how I earn passive income on this coin?
|
|
|
Is it true I can earn passive income with PFR coins?
|
|
|
+1 for Quadrigcx. recently made a deposit there, they credited me within 24 hours! Compared to Kraken, which I also made a deposit with, been over 2 weeks and nothing.
|
|
|
with scrypt only, 3.1.1 causes an error, regardless of pool. cgminer 3.1.1 log [2013-05-15 07:06:23] Started cgminer 3.1.1 [2013-05-15 07:06:23] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [2013-05-15 07:06:23] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [2013-05-15 07:06:23] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (793.1) [2013-05-15 07:06:23] Platform 0 devices: 1 [2013-05-15 07:06:23] 0 Cypress [2013-05-15 07:06:23] GPU 0 ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series hardware monitoring enabled [2013-05-15 07:06:24] Init GPU thread 0 GPU 0 virtual GPU 0 [2013-05-15 07:06:24] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [2013-05-15 07:06:24] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [2013-05-15 07:06:24] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (793.1) [2013-05-15 07:06:24] List of devices: [2013-05-15 07:06:24] 0 Cypress [2013-05-15 07:06:24] Selected 0: Cypress [2013-05-15 07:06:24] Selecting scrypt kernel [2013-05-15 07:06:32] Initialising kernel scrypt130511.cl with bitalign, 1 vectors and worksize 256 [2013-05-15 07:06:32] initCl() finished. Found Cypress [2013-05-15 07:06:32] 1 gpu miner threads started [2013-05-15 07:06:32] Network diff set to 39.7M [2013-05-15 07:06:32] New block: f377e4dce13e0a7b... diff 39.7M [2013-05-15 07:06:33] New best share: 1 [2013-05-15 07:06:33] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error [2013-05-15 07:06:34] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error ^C [2013-05-15 07:06:34] Received kill message
cgminer 3.1.0 works fine [2013-05-15 07:05:05] Started cgminer 3.1.0 [2013-05-15 07:05:05] CL Platform 0 vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [2013-05-15 07:05:05] CL Platform 0 name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [2013-05-15 07:05:05] CL Platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (793.1) [2013-05-15 07:05:05] Platform 0 devices: 1 [2013-05-15 07:05:05] 0 Cypress [2013-05-15 07:05:05] GPU 0 ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series hardware monitoring enabled [2013-05-15 07:05:06] Init GPU thread 0 GPU 0 virtual GPU 0 [2013-05-15 07:05:06] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [2013-05-15 07:05:06] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing [2013-05-15 07:05:06] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.1 AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5 (793.1) [2013-05-15 07:05:06] List of devices: [2013-05-15 07:05:06] 0 Cypress [2013-05-15 07:05:06] Selected 0: Cypress [2013-05-15 07:05:07] Selecting scrypt kernel [2013-05-15 07:05:07] Initialising kernel scrypt130302.cl with bitalign, 1 vectors and worksize 256 [2013-05-15 07:05:07] initCl() finished. Found Cypress [2013-05-15 07:05:07] 1 gpu miner threads started [2013-05-15 07:05:07] Network diff set to 39.7M [2013-05-15 07:05:07] New block: f377e4dce13e0a7b... diff 39.7M [2013-05-15 07:05:09] Setting GPU 0 fan percentage to 51 [2013-05-15 07:05:11] Received kill message [2013-05-15 07:05:11] Thread 0 being disabled
|
|
|
Um that's a change.. if the miners wont do it then nothing will happen. There is no way around it... this will change bitcoin forever and not in a good way.
One version update != forever. He can easily revert this as: 1. Bitcoin's value changes. 2. Someone writes a better solution to the DDoS problem. 3. Other reasons.
|
|
|
rM3tuvHoD83FU85kV7U4i9fiixPZjpqnm4
|
|
|
Does the current PPS amount quoted include the fee, or is it calculated after? Current rate is 0.00003262705594458 BTC per share.
Would I get 0.00003262705594458, or 0.00003262705594458*0.9?
Thanks
|
|
|
I'm getting a lot of disconnects: caught, Final response/writing Request.finish called on a request after its connection was lost; use Request.notifyFinish to keep track of this. caught, Final response/writing Request.finish called on a request after its connection was lost; use Request.notifyFinish to keep track of this. caught, Final response/writing Request.finish called on a request after its connection was lost; use Request.notifyFinish to keep track of this. caught, Final response/writing Request.finish called on a request after its connection was lost; use Request.notifyFinish to keep track of this.
And it hops servers back and forth, anyone else getting this?
|
|
|
This is a very good pool. I've tried several pools including eligius, btcmine, deepbit, btcguild, and so far this one is the quickest and most reliable.
Highly recommended.
|
|
|
Where accepts money order?
|
|
|
anyone notice 'slower' performance? I am noticing 'slower' performance with SDK 2.1
|
|
|
Is there a way to limit the amount of memory phoenix miner uses? It eventually uses up all my memory and crashes on linux.
|
|
|
i saw the topic and i cringed a little.
|
|
|
warning: this looks like spam, website may even steal your username/passwords, I wouldn't even click.
seems mods have already marked him as a spammer.
|
|
|
I'm trying to get some bitcoins/mtgox money with my moneybookers account in USD, what options do I have?
I know there's VirWox but the volume on there seems very low, and the fees seem high.
Thanks
|
|
|
8 connections is the standard amount bitcoin client tries to maintain. Try forwarding the bitcoin port on your router, could help.
|
|
|
Pretty insightful post, makes sense to me. If anyone has anything to add, do so.
Some people think mining difficulty affects the price as well. But as shown lately, bitcoin has dropped in value, but mining difficulty has not. I'd say it's more likely that 'difficulty' follows the price rather than the price follows difficulty. But as people have purchased hardware for mining, they will likely be mining until it becomes a loss leader.
|
|
|
|