If you're looking towards becoming part of a news team of an upcoming site I have a proposition for you. We need experienced crypto news writers on a partnership basis.

We already have a head of news and are seeking the partnership of two more news writers. For now, our demand is one or two articles a day. Your reward is a share in the company's revenue. If you're interested in a long term promising partnership, PM me.

Our site is https://cryptoinfowatch.com and we're dedicated to fighting scams. However a section of our readers are eager for recent news so if you're up to it, contact me on Telegram for quicker response @Cyberczar.

I guess that he is the real writer of that article based on the name of the writer at medium. I also guess that he should have write a little bit of context of what he wrote on that link in this forum and on his OP. I think that he's just wanted some clap for his work.

Why not write the same on the forum and do not issue in a beautiful topic? You could then earn Merit.
My vision of the situation with the IEO is as follows. I do not think this is worthy of my attention for the reason that the large stock exchanges are deceiving their investors and do not give everyone access to investing in order to create a stir. In the meantime, they earn big money on the growth of their tokens.

As like previously I had mentioned, he needs to get some visitors in his site. That's it. Nothing else. If he posted the whole article, would you use your time to visit his site? Simply no. That's the reason.

For a starter, I hate been redirected out of forum to go read some article, if you're the original owner of article then post then on forum and you can add a source link at the end for reference purpose or indicate you're the original owner of article to avoid been accused of plagiarism.

---

In addition: There's a disadvantage I have noticed in the past project that carryout their crowdfunding through IEO which is very disturbing. The whales are manipulating the sales, they buy all the token in matter of sec/mins leaving the average investor with no token to buy which is bad because this guy's can easily manipulate the price of this coins/tokens when they hit the market. Exchange need to find solution to this issue which could be solved by putting buy limits on each account.

I think it is wrong to rate everything according to the value of paper money without paying attention to what it is, how it was created and what it could do. Even the paper money which is valuable today originates from humanity itself. But ignoring BTC will return as the greatest regret.

OK I do have 1 question. We can see now that hashrate is dropping, so theoretically this means miners are making more each day, and not less, in terms of Bitcoin I mean.

Will this reflect in your earnings dashboard? My experience is cloud contracts only decrease with difficulty but never in the opposite direction.

Also, what's the min withdraw? And assuming today rate is same, how many days til min withdraw? And how many til break even? I know I can go and calculate myself, but if anyone can share, would be great.

Rockminer.... that name certainly brings back memories for older members of the forum, and not necessarily good memories either.
But anyway, that AMHash drama was all a long time ago (in cryptoland time anyway), over three years.....
I thought the brand ROCKMINER would have been so toxic after that episode and the behavior of the principals involved so poor, plus the fact that Rockminer were broke and not making anything, that the name would have been dropped as useless.
The next time I heard of Rockminer being mentioned was when I was researching the Gainbitcoin cloudmining scam and the thief and scammer Amit Bhardwaj came out as having bought 40% of the Rockminer company, two years ago, thru his fraudulent company Amaze Mining..



Yes, only two years ago, within "2-3 months," he claimed that

(Which turned out to be 10% less than Bitmain's S9 chips).

Your own version of your timeline doesn't include Mr. Bhardwaj's investment though. Why is that?



In that short period of time, Rockminer claim to have built a huge business




What I find most impressive is that you have been able to build this huge conglomerate without the Internet noticing at all.
Google "Rockminer" and see what I mean.
Apart from the newly revitalized Rockminer.com site at the top, your first page is ancient reviews of 2014 hardware, not one single mention, not a press release, not a review, of all the massive expansion you claim into the realms of
Nothing apart from your Twitter account that is, which has a four year silence until this August.
When I say "without the Internet noticing" (further example, the Wayback Machine shows nothing for four years), I guess maybe that's what people mean when they refer to the 'Great Firewall': a Chinese company like Rockminer can bring itself back from the dead and grow into a major player in the Bitcoin world without the West knowing about it at all?

---

This seems to be a strange time strategically to be actively expanding cloud mining activity, when it's estimated that something like 500,000 S9's equivalent have stopped mining BTC during the recent price and difficulty drop.
Presumably you feel confident to be able to deliver a profitable service, seeing as you claim to be mining with
machines.
Which would they be, as you only list Avalon 841's as the most efficient on your shop page (insecure btw), and they are not 75W/T?

You're going to write down every private key for every adress you use? Didn't think so.
This isn't practical at all when you're frequently transacting with bitcoin. (As i suspect many here are.) It's an unnecessary hassle ontop of that as well.

Also, what about handwriting/spelling mistakes? A private key is 50+ characters. Misspelling a 5 for an S is easily done..