Is this scam still alive?

Remember when I advised you all to run away at $0.30?

Guys just cut your losses and join a real project instead of this scam

Another GIANT red-flag for the Credits SCAM project.

First they moved to a new topic, self moderated one, under the lie of 'people are spamming'.

Slowly they started to censor the topic, and by now ONLY positive posts are allowed.

ALL negative reponses and posts are immediately deleted.

Furthermore, admin has been going further back in time and is systematically deleting all criticisms.

By now, the number of deleted posts is 100+, which more than 10 pages! worth of posts.

Not the mention the thrice delayed mainnet, and still nothing tangible has been delivered after 1.5 years of ICO.

Stay away, FAAAR away people.

Circulating supply agaij increased with 0.5m tokens, and again price dumped 10%.

Who is selling these newly circulating supply token?

Must be painful to see this kind of price action after a mainnet.

Probably none, as nobody knows whether this current mainnet is going to be replaced anyway.

there is a 1k coinswap limit, which can easily be circumvented by sending coins from different wallets.

Which begs the question; why is there a limit at all?

Are we talking abour the same craight wtaight?
The one who called credits a SCAM?

He is the genius visionary behind bitcoin?

Are you bipolar?

Let me get this straight: you actually believe Craig Loser Wright that he is the genius Satoshi, who created bitcoin?

WTF HAS BSV TO DO WITH ANYTHING HAHAHAHA

BSV IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT THE ARTICLE IS TRYING TO PROVE HAHAHAHHA

YOU LITERALLY DIDNT UNDERSTAND A WORD OF THE ARTICLE HAHAHHAAHAH


Makes sense though, you liking BSV, as it is the same centralised piece of shit as Credits

hahaha iit's so awesome this board.
I can literally feel your frustration because you can't ban or silence me here xD

Imagine if new investors join this forum to check if this is a good investment.
They will probably not be scared of my posts because they will label them FUD, but they will most definitely be scared by your ignorance and stupidity of your reasons for investing in this shit xD

https://hackernoon.com/sharding-centralizes-ethereum-by-selling-you-scaling-in-disguised-as-scaling-out-266c136fc55d

read this.
Then tell, me what is my favourite project?

If you don't understand this article, then I'm afraid you will be unable to comprehend this discussion.

Why arent you posting screenshot of your so-called trades?

Btw, in my answer I posted a link with a very detailed explanation about which blockchain is the best and why.
If you would have taken your time to read it, you would have known my answer to that question.
But i guess you got scared after 2 sentences, because it's full of technical jargon, which a simple mind like yours cant hope to process.

What a weak answer.

When are you going to post screenshots of your trades on kucoin and lbank?

You know, that question I raised 2 pages ago, because I KNOW you are lying?

What a weak answer.

Reminds me of that blond extreme right-wing politician who thinks that everything will be better once we get rid (either peacefully or forcefully) of a certain group of people who believe in something else.
Does suit your personality though. Banning everyone who even is a bit negative from the chat, so you get a nice and cozy place where only positive things are being shared.

Anyway, keep up the positive spirit and keep hodling bro!
Even though the price down 75% from when you banned me (triggering me to sell), you are still smarter and better blockchain investor than I am xD

I am curious though, which part of my answer do you believe to be an opinion?
Can you quote it?

Maybe I can teach you a few things about how blockchains work.

Read my answers again.

There is 0!!! opinion in there.
It's all FACTS.
Facts as we know them TODAY.

In fact, it's your answer that is FULL of opinions and positive biases.
I mean, every 'fact' you've stated starts with "I THINK" xD

I mean, who the hell thinks that CENTRALISED IBM servernodes are positive for your blockchain?
WHy do you think bitcoin is so huge? It's because you can even run it on a computer from 2001.

But I must admit, I stopped taking your post seriously when you said that the 'consensus algoritm is great'.
It is very clear you have no idea what you are talking about (as nobody has any idea how credits consensus works), and are just rambling on about how great the world is.

Great that you are hoping for better days tomorrow, but TODAY it is a worthless investment.

The sun may or may not shine today, but if it -10C outside, it's probably winter outside.
So wear a sweater instead of t-shirt

Here you go, in bold my response:

Burak, as promised I made a list of points which determine why I believe in CS. This is written at a point were no code or main net has been released:

- I do think that they have to correct approach by having offices and take blockchain out in the open with a team to help partners/dapps/the target group on implementing their systems on the CS blockchain
Every project has offices. Doesn't mean anything. Every project has partners and dapps running. Doesnt mean anything. It's still one in a dozen project

- I do think that visiting a lot of blockchain summits and other fairs regarding blockchain related services is a good thing that the team have been doing since ICO to draw attention for the usecase of CS and their product.
Every project visits blockchain summits lol. Even DETH, which worth like 700k$ lol, is visiting everything from events in Amsterdam to in Hawai. Must be nice to travel all over the world and spend that nice ICO $$$ on luxurieus life.

- I do think that having focus on development, instead of direct listings after ICO, is a good way of creating a blockchain like CS is trying to create. Tech first, listings at second/third/etc. place.
That's literally nonsense. Price + ranking on CMC has a direct impact on partner selection for dapps. Who would you coopoerate with, a random nobody-has-ever0heard-of credits, or something like EOS which is on #5, while both boasting incredible speeds.
Anyway, no listing = worhtless operational tokens = out of money = bankrupt.

- I do think that the team listens very carefully to what the market is demanding. The other products from CS, sub-chain/private-chain/DBMS, are an example of listening to the demands of their target group. These other products, besides the main chain, can help CS to become adopted faster compared to having only a main/public chain (https://creditsenterprise.com/)
Nobody has every requested side chains. A private chain further destroys the use case of CS token, as they will issue their own token on their own network.
Enterprise blockchains are a stupid idea, just use a standard database if you want to use it intenrally. Blockchains are meant for using between parties that doe not trust and do not know each other.
If you have trust issues within your enteprise, a blockchain implementation will hardly be a solution lol

- I do think that a product which can handle 50.000 TPS at release, and the possibility to reach 1 million TPS later on, is something which is much needed to welcome ‘old-economy-organisations’ to blockchain with their systems/software/databases.
there are projects claiming 50k+ tps atm than I can count. Might have been a USP 2 years ago, but because of the delay after delay, credits is no longer unique. Again, one in a dozen.

- I do think that the role of IBM Blockchain Labs, in person by Nitin as advisor, can help opening doors for CS which normally would be closed. Accepting Nitin as an advisor is something that’s a good thing in my opinion
Nitin is just being paid to tweet and mention credits sometimes in interviews. He is hardly even involved in the project, other than visiting the office 1 time for 30 minutes lol.

- I do think that using IBM cloud solutions for running nodes is a good thing. American/European countries are very negative regarding Russia and or Russian companies. Letting IBM cloud processing the node-data is a very good step in taking away any fear regarding the Russian roots of this project.
Thats not how a blockchain works. Everyone should be able to run a node.
https://hackernoon.com/sharding-centralizes-ethereum-by-selling-you-scaling-in-disguised-as-scaling-out-266c136fc55d

Read this, you might learn something.

Again, this is a BAD things that IBM nodes are being used, not a good thing. it just means that the network cannot be run on regular computers = CENTRALISED

- I do think that CS have done a great job in communicating what their chain can do and which use cases are suitable for the CS chain
I do hope you are being sarcastic here. They haven't communicated anything, except for some high level general use cases.
Every project does this. Again, one in a dozen. Nothing special.

- I do think that staking CS in order to run a node (in consensus) is very important to keep a certain safety for the network
Sure it does. It also creates a centralisation aspect, as now you need $$ to run a node.
Also CS can change stakingamount at any time, basically blocking everyone from being a consensus node.

- Last but not least; I do think that the consensus algorithm is a solid algorithm which helps this chain to scale for wide adoption
You have NO idea how the consensus algoritm works.
In fact, NO ONE knows how it works.
It's CLOSED SOURCE.
Do you know what that menas?
It means, that until they OPEN SOURCE you have no idea what you have bought.

Just imagine you think you have bought a Lambo, but when you open the hood you see a toyota aygo engine xD


Hope it's clear for you know why this is (currently) a worthless investment.
There are far better alternatives on the market than this closed source, centralised, poorly managed crap.

All you have that is something out of the ordinary are IBM tweets about credits, but if you read them carefully, each one of them ends with an AD FOR IBM.

hey Art idiot,

can you please educate us idiots why credits is such as great investment?
You are only allowed to use facts, so no speculation and no lies.

I'm, and everyone else, is very curious.

Just make a short list for us to see why you think credits is so great.
I will try to give my objective opinion on it by also replying with facts on your arguments.

Deal?
Or will you run away from a factual discussion, because all facts disprove credits?

Rank (based on kucoin price) is already #235

hahahahahaahahah

i'm enjoying seeing this coin crash and burn

Daar gaat ie weer met zijn telegram spookjes.
Wat ben je toch een ongelofelijke debiel

IK HEB GEEN TELEGRAM MEER KUT DEBIEL DAT JE BENT.

Hoe gaat het op LBANK?
Inmiddels ook al -20% sinds gisteren HAHAHA.

Wat zei je gisteren ook alweer?
Ohw het is maar 2% down op de announcement.
Lol, letterlijk 3 cent eraf al van (van $0.12 naar $0.09 inmiddels)
Kun je het zelf uitrekenen of moet ik je ff meegeven dat dat -25% is?

Ik zou eerder subsidie aanvragen voor jezelf. Je staat inmiddels al -75% xD