Bitcoin Forum
August 21, 2024, 07:59:50 AM *
News: All versions of Windows are affected by a critical security bug; make sure you update.
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Multipool - the pool mining pool on: June 24, 2011, 08:11:56 PM
Mining for 18 hours by about 280MH/s at multipool. Not enought to see if it's efective for me, but what I can see now is, that my stale rate is much higher than when I mined on single pool. Used to have it at about 0,5%, now with 52 stales from 3700 shares I'm at about 1,4%
Is this normal?
Using poclbm -v -w256 -f60 with 6870 at 1000Mhz core and 346Mhz RAM, backed up with "poclbm -f300" on deepbit for case of multipool problems. While the deepbit backup is getting only about 10MH/s, it's at 3 stale out of 350 shares.

I got a lot of rejected shares too, but I noticed that the number of those fits my usual 2% + the solo shares perfectly (though I'm not sure if it's really the reason for that).
2  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~500Gh/s] Bitcoins.lc - No invalid blocks, Instant payout, EU, IPv6, 0% fee, LP on: June 24, 2011, 07:47:44 PM
What are your settings?
I actually get far fewer here than any other pool! I'm sitting at about .3% out of about 300,000+ shares!


My settings for phoenix 1.50 are:
-k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false

I just started my miner again and will see if it works now.

With regards to the work queue empty problem:
Try adding -q 3 before the -k switch in phoenix to have more than only one queue. You probably have to figure out which value is perfect for you Wink.

Edit:
Seems to work perfectly now and I'm back to my usual 2%.
3  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~500Gh/s] Bitcoins.lc - No invalid blocks, Instant payout, EU, IPv6, 0% fee, LP on: June 24, 2011, 03:05:05 PM
fix yo shit.

i make twice as much here as i do at deepbit. deepbit's fees are WAY TOO HIGH. plus, inorder for deepbit to match bitcoins.lc, deepbit needs to hit a block every 20 min. and that DOESNT HAPPEN!

tl;dr i make a ton more here than i do at any other pool.

I just looked at the deepbit stats page and the last 50 blocks were found within about 18 minutes each on average. I too make less money here, but it's due to my rejected shares which I get on this pool only (other pools with the exact same settings will only reject about 2-3%, not 50-70%).

This doesn't mean I'm mining at deepbit though and I really hope you can fix it as no matter what settings I use your pool rejects so many shares :-/.
4  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~500Gh/s] Bitcoins.lc - No invalid blocks, Instant payout, EU, IPv6, 0% fee, LP on: June 24, 2011, 11:46:16 AM
Somehow I get about 50-75% rejected shares when I use your pool. Right now it says "6 / 17    40.56 Mhash/s" on your website while I'm getting about 220 MHash/s on any other pool  Undecided
5  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: bit pit - (LP, Prop, OnDemand, SSL, 0% fee!) on: June 22, 2011, 01:08:28 AM
Your hash rate calculation seems quite a bit off to me Wink.
It shows 6 MHashes/sec while my miner shows 220 Mhashes/sec, and I get my shares accepted at the rate I usually have on other pools, so it's probably not bad luck Wink.
6  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: worth it to build a mining rig now?? on: June 18, 2011, 07:10:07 PM
I wouldn't recommend building a mining rig right now, except if you want to use the components for computer games. If you factor in electricity costs and the increasing difficulty, it will take a long time until you break even. You will get about 10 BTC until the difficulty increases, after that you will get less (I'd guesstimate it to be about 30-40% every 2 weeks). So without electrity costs and a stable price of 16 USD per BTC you might be able to break even in 4 months.

I have to pay about 0,35 USD per kW/h (after converting it from my local currency). Your system will probably use about 800W, which would be about 200 USD for me in just one month. So with this rig I would lose about 50% of my BTC to the electricity bill in the first month, and even more in the following months due to the increasing difficulty.

So expect it to be at least 9 months (probably even more or never) with your rig running 24/7 until you might break even.
7  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [1 BTC BOUNTY] BITCOIN PHOENIX MINING PROBLEM on: June 18, 2011, 08:58:06 AM
I guess it's the missing SDK, too. Try one up to 2.3, otherwise you might just try to use the phatk kernel anyway. To do this, use -k phatk instead of -k poclbm.
8  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: HD6850 Memory clock on: June 15, 2011, 11:49:13 PM
I finally managed to lower the memory clock on my card using ATI Tray Tool!  Smiley

Also I tweaked air flow a bit and I am down to 72°C now with 1028/425 Mhz on stock voltage with stock cooler, also getting about 270MHashes/sec. Seems running fine too for about 30 minutes now, will see if it stays this way.
9  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Curious about peoples clocks and flags for caymans (HD69xx) cards on: June 15, 2011, 03:15:45 AM
Try playing with the AGGRESSION value and add FASTLOOP=false for the higher levels - those might help.
10  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Low-Impact Mining? (10-20% CPU) on: June 13, 2011, 12:55:40 PM
I am doing this and use two different profiles for pure mining and mining while gaming respectively.

I'm using the phoenix miner with the phatk kernel and setting the AGGRESSION parameter to 3 I can fluently play any of my games on my HD6850 and still get about 100-110 MHashes/s.
For pure mining I set AGGRESSION to 16 which after trying differing settings yields the most (about 262) MHashes/s for me.

As for CPU mining, I let the ufasoft miner run at 100% and low priority and got no problems so far (and an additional 13 MHashes/s while my PC is otherwise idle).
11  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: HD6850 Memory clock on: June 12, 2011, 10:57:47 AM
Oh I don't care too much about increasing the MHashes/s but reducing the temperature would probably be good as it's at the 91°C right now. At least I'm not the only one with this problem.
12  Other / Beginners & Help / HD6850 Memory clock on: June 12, 2011, 10:31:08 AM
I got a new HD6850 by Sapphire and tried to OC the GPU while lowering the the memory clock, as was suggested by a thread in the Mining forum.

I tried both MSI Afterburner and Trixx and still I can't really lower the memory clock of my graphics card. Both tools allow me to set a lower clockrate but the memory clock seems to be stuck at 1000 MHz anyway (at least that's what the graphs are showing; temperature and current aren't dropping either).

Does anyone have a similar experience or is it just impossible to lower the memory clock on this card?
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!