 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
can anyone help / or point me in the right direction to find help (ive tried SMOS chat a few times, dont get anyone to even reply or ack my issue):
any / all miner types im trying (via changeing miner in smos dashboard, tried xmr,eth claymore and ethminer + sgminer) are showing no GPUs found (or similar message depending upon the miner im trying) , yet SMOS shows the amd gpu driver is loaded and sees the gpu:
Lanparty NF4 mb, 1x RX 550 , ssh into the smos miner shows the card and its driver:
(i have tried with monitor attached to the RX 550 4gb , and with no monitor attached, i get same "no gpu found" error from miner apps)
miner@simpleminer:~$ lspci -k | grep -EA3 'VGA|3D|Display'
05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 699f (rev c7)
Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Device 9550
Kernel driver in use: amdgpu
Kernel modules: amdgpu
any ideas (or where should i look for help)?
(smos help page just directs you to the chat, which hasnt helped at all for me)
tks
|
|
|
|
|
very cool! am using now, and will continue to! tks
|
|
|
|
Nice find!
I can't imagine that Bitpay is going to leave that there any longer though, it seems like a mistake for them to do so and now that it is publicly known, it will probably go away.
I actually thought the exact same as you, in putting this out as pub. as i can, bitpay will now remove it (which will hurt me bc i always use tails liveOS for ANY btc wallet access).. BUT it looks like this was the right move! (and right move by bitpay, for once). the post here and at reddit, got a reply from one of their reps (on reddit, of course  , but they published this KB (so looks like the -noscript url trick will stay!! ): https://support.bitpay.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003014566-Why-can-t-I-pay-a-BitPay-invoice-in-my-Tor-browser- |
|
|
|
I assume it is per day.
There currently 300 k transactions per day. If the typical transaction sends bitcoins to a new address plus a new change address, then 600 k new addresses per day seems reasonable.
This does make sense and add up. Maybe we should just chalk this up to an oversight/typo in the graphs actual title/description. As all the other graphs ( that have a specific time frame for the data points) , clearly state it - in the description and/or title (i.e. X number of Y per second or per day ect..).. |
|
|
|
Looking at this graph/data from blockchain.info: https://blockchain.info/charts/n-unique-addressesHow can only 600k unique addresses be the total ever to have appeared on the block chain? ( I would understand if this was a graph of unique addresses in the past 24 or 48 hours or some period Like that - but not unique addresses that have ever appeared on the blockchain?? ) (Also why would this number / chart line ever dip down , i.e. Look at a 30 or 60day graph- shouldn't it always be increasing or at minimum staying the same from day to day?) I guess what is also confusing to me, is that the only way to get bitcoins into an address is to perform a transaction (short of mining a block) , so 600,000 unique addresses (total , ever) Divided by $40 billion (about @ 2300$ Per btc) total value of all outstanding bitcoins equals an average address value of around $61,000  I'm just so confused by this graph and was hoping someone could shed some light - wouldn't this also mean that less than 600,000 people worldwide have ever done a btc transaction ( because one person could of course have multiple addresses, but even if everyone only had one address it would mean only 600,000 addresses have actually been used in a valid transaction- right?) Thanks! Edit: maybe this means unique IP addresses ? ( if so I really think blockchain.info should specify this, either at the top of the graph or on their "charts" page where they give a bit of a description for each graph/data set) |
|
|
|
Ive been reading this thread occasionally, i am not an investor. but i havent seen any discussion of this blog post from 4 days ago: Testing Results Of BE200.md
We've got the results of one good testing board,it seems not very good,but sill can be accepted.We will receive more chips at next weekend if things are going well .
Results:
Board:one chip testing board
Frequency:360Mhz
Volt:0.72V
Hashrate per chip:11.52Ghash
Power consumption:6.375W per chip
Power consumption per Ghash:6.375/11.52=0.5539W/Ghash
After power supply changeover:0.5539/81% = 0.684W/Ghash（at blade）
Power consumption on wall:0.684/0.8 = 0.855W/G
Adding other components loss about 1KW/Thash
Tips:this result is not very accurate just for reference.
Posted at 2014-04-13 from: http://blog.rockminer.com/ |
|
|
|
|
Im looking for users to share their pandacoin vertminer settings, i'll start off with what i have working on my 270 and 270x r9 cards:
180 khash/s on 270x:
pool
removed- lots of complaints that this will help the noobs get in..sorry about that
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Im on latest version of linux BAMT, this rig was running great on DOGEcoin w cgminer and its 270x (470 kh/s) and 270 card (450 kh/s), im trying to mine Pandacoin at united-miners.com pool and have vertminer version 0.5.4pre2 installed and running, ive tried running tons of different setting in my cgminer.conf file but i keep getting rejected (Share is above target) over and over till i get a temp ban from the pool.
Ive posted the raw output below and the most recent cgminer.conf ive tried. Ive searched the forums high and low and the only solution i can find is when users are getting this same error, they are running cgminer, not vertminer.
Any ideas or suggestions for what my cgminer.conf should be?
will tip in doge or btc for help with this.
thanks
vertminer version 0.5.4pre2 - Started: [2014-02-15 10:50:37]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):192.1K (avg):198.4Kh/s | A:0 R:96 HW:0 WU:216.8/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 (-nan%) NB: 0 PA: 7 PR: 2 LW: 31 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to panda.xxx.com diff 16 with stratum as user jaxxx
Block: 6625c8c1... Diff:67 Started: [10:50:38] Best share: 85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 43.0C 1771RPM | 99.62K/104.0Kh/s | A:0 R:16 HW:0 WU: 82.8/m I:10
GPU 1: 43.0C 1325RPM | 101.8K/106.2Kh/s | A:0 R:96 HW:0 WU:134.0/m I:10
[2014-02-15 10:51:00] Rejected 0307758c Diff 85/16 GPU 1 (Share is above target)
the line above over and over....
|
|
|
|
|
+1
Mine this coin on United-Miners.com great pool with a very active management team, always on IRC ready to help
|
|
|
|
|
has anyone received a refund for the 2 incidents of downtime in this thread? just curious as i'm thinking of renting some of hostkey's rigs. I've leased a few rigs from other providers and have had no downtime.
tks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Im running a
2 x XFX (maker) r9- 770x on a BAMT (linux) latest version, and cgminer, at 1180 engine / 1500 mem i can get 480-490 kH/sec, but unless the room is at 72 degrees(f) temp or less, the card will creep above 83c. - stock cgminer will not unlock the voltage of this card and the 490 kH/sec seems to be the best i can get.
the dual ssytem is using ~ 420-460 watts of power (meter at the power cord). its a older AMD X2 CPU on a NF4 controller (DFI LanPart dual PCI-E mobo). 450w PC Power and Cooling PSU
and a 2nd rig of:
nvidia (brand) GTX 770 on cudaminer (latest) on win 7, with msi afterburner tweaking its running at ~350-370 kH/s.
Im going to buy a few more cards, ( im thinking R9s) , what are some favorites you all like? I dont care if its in stock as i can wait, im mainly looking for:
-cgminer can tweak the voltage (or its easy to somehow tweak the voltage, not a voltage locked like my XFX R9)
- Some real kH/sec and Power (Watts) figures.
Ive torn through the message baords for weeks now, as well as the comparison charts via google, im looking for more current upto date info on these cards (running latest cgminer ect..)
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Im on coinex mining scrypt at ~ 2Mh/s using the switch pool at :9933
2 questions:
1) how do i enable auto sell?
2) I have 3 machines running cudaminer and 1 machine running cgminer (with 2 GPUs), im seeing alot of rejected shares on cgminer machine. usually zero rejected shares on the cudaminer machines. when i mine at other pools i get normal 0-0.5% rejected shares.
any ideas captainFuture? the rejects are killing me on that cgminer machine at coinex bc that machine is my main, fastest rig.
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
