 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
How to run LINUX communitycon-qt in Ubuntu? Which command to type? Thank you.
I normally used ./communitycoind to run. There are a lot of commands: ./communitycoind getbalance ./communitycoind listtransactions .... I think run qt use ./communitycoind-qt ? Not sure. |
|
|
|
voted! 6282-6287  Guys! keep going! Yes, it's the Community Time! vote 6332-6337 |
|
|
|
I Wounder if that is being Planned all along!?? I mean i dont say its a conspiracy,but it sems a bit odd that now the whales can get in cheap,where they before canīt (or not like with other coins) Dont Know but..........its smells fishy?!!  Does look like a conspiracy The murder of a lot of people |
|
|
|
Just popped in this thread for the time in about a week. In seeing the last few posts, let me just say that CHAOSiTEC has a very sound character, and I doubt he would be cheating anyone.
I think he should deceive us Hope is a joke to |
|
|
|
Well that's what happends when 80% focus is on back-end with no marketing in a high pace development environment.
I agree with you, but then, this is a community-driven coin where most of the work is done by volunteers. So feel free to step up. I also agree to do What do you have a better offer I mean let us more favorable  |
|
|
|
How much of this proposal, and of other similar proposals, can be handled by the asset description field? (Not much space is needed to store a URL.).I love namespaces, etc., but I want to keep the protocol-level as simple and as stupid as possible. We could do this sort of thing is Counterwallet and BootleXCP themselves, for example.
Extremely good point and porqupine has also communicated the same to me. We would only need a naming convention on how to format the asset description field. The rest can be up to the client side to parse it. As long as there was some defacto which was perhaps outlined by the Counterparty team but not necessarily enforced, then everyone would be a happy camper. Eg Lets just use the tilde as a delimiting character in the description. Field 1 = namespace, field 2 = description, field 3 = url It needs to be a new long asset name field that is enforced by the protocol for long names. A description will not work because users can put anything in there. My understanding (a dev can correct me) is that the description field can be modified for an asset. So lets just say we all agree on a defacto standard for the description field. There are 3 fields delimited by a tilde. Each of the clients can just invalidate and fail to show any asset in their list where 3 tildes aren't found. The asset owner would have motivation to get it right. I think you understand very well That's perfectly correct I said I agree with you  |
|
|
|
Does anyone know the legality of the devs getting rid of something within the protocol which is non consentual to other users of bitcoin, it can;t be legal
there must be regulations in place
Not kidding, I honestly did laugh while reading this. XCP people threatening lawsuits over their choice of poor design implementation that leaves them vulnerable to any whim the BTC devs might have for changing protocol. Counterparty might provide benefits, so it would probably be good if it succeeds, but this is not a viable argument route haha. See this article I also can't help laughing |
|
|
|
Asset fees should not be burned because then we are diminishing the total supply. Since there is no mining, or additionally BTC burning going on, why don't we change the protocol to distribute asset fees among all holders of XCP?
1) Distributing the XCP is very difficult technically, because of rounding issues. 2) The two possibilities are economically equivalent, and the total number of XCP doesn't matter so much, because of the divisibility. You don't think a higher escrow amount would have worked better than a 5 xcp asset fee? We have hundreds of Asset names already parked - imagine what it will be like when the user base is 50x ? The vast majority of those assets were created before the fee was put in place. I agree with you I believe many people have this idea |
|
|
|
Newbie here. So is proof-of-burn still how people are buying these? Or should I buy through Poloniex?  I was a rookie Hope to get help from others Someone to help us?  |
|
|
|
I think that the ability of getting XCP with proof-of-burn should be postponed to the time when there will be a stable client. It will help the distribution of the coin. If not there will be another distributed exchange with large-holders(who risked their money into a thing that didn't worked at the time) which will be very unhealthy for the counterparty system.
I think your suggestion is very good very correct The proposal should get their research Hoping to solve |
|
|
|
i can t use my dogewallet anymore , it says that i have to make an conf file with a new pass and user , some help please  It seems you're the same as me is a rookie PM I tell you the process |
|
|
|
that sell wall at 200  Better look at what is happening with bitcoin , some nasty storm will come from there. If btc takes a dive there will be a bank run to transform the doge into fiat. Bit position is a little disturbance can not be shaken or will return to its orbit Refueling bit with you |
|
|
|
some pool promo
dude, could you pls stop flooding this thread with some promo of mining pools? honestly, it's become really annoying and pool list is well known. thanks. I also think very annoying As everyone knows things also repeatedly stressed that boring |
|
|
|
|
Don't simply imitate blackcoin, this is no future, my friend!
|
|
|
|
|
I always believe that NXT will become the next BITCOIN！
|
|
|
|
FairCoin needs pool like the one for BlackCoin http://www.blackcoinpool.com/That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now! Yes this is defnitly a great idea if any pool admins is able to do something like this for faircoin! I also think it is a good idea, but first we must have a bigger platform support. Considering the circumstances, I think we should donate money to mintpal So we will have a great deal of trading platform as the support. My friends, you are from American or Europe, are you than those Chinese is poor? Actually i believe waiting after poc to get in will be of more benefits to faircoin. Having Faircoin first on mintpal voting for the next 4-6 days will give us more visibility before we actually hit the market. Then if som1 can really manage that genius idea of multipool this could be truly an amazing feature. Creating constant buy orders and demand this is going to be good. I have to admit that what you said is very reasonable So let us wait quietly, have a look what the future will bring! |
|
|
|
|
Oh, I think this topic is really good water.
But I still wouldn't buy this coin you
Because now it has too many coins.
I can't waste my money
But I wish you good luck.
|
|
|
|
FairCoin needs pool like the one for BlackCoin http://www.blackcoinpool.com/That would drive the price up no doubt, don't think another exchange will do much good for now! Yes this is defnitly a great idea if any pool admins is able to do something like this for faircoin! I also think it is a good idea, but first we must have a bigger platform support. Considering the circumstances, I think we should donate money to mintpal So we will have a great deal of trading platform as the support. My friends, you are from American or Europe, are you than those Chinese is poor? |
|
|
|
|
We also will experience a crazy prices?
I am afraid, I have on this coin on a lot of loss.
This lets me be unable to eat and sleep.
|
|
|
|
|
