 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Stable in top 8 coin, XEM is one of the best ico so far. Incredible pump, i love it.
|
|
|
|
|
"Put 10% of your money into gold and hope it does not work." -Wall Street saying
|
|
|
|
Monero, Augur, and Factom are all invited. Seems CEO of Zaif was inivted, they need to confirm. They're part of the Mijin team that uses NEM ... we should join in and ask questions Nov 21st, Riccardo Spangi - Developer in the Monero Core Team Dec 3rd ,Takao Asayama, CEO of Zaif Dec 6th, Jeremy Gardner, Co-Founder of Augur Dec 6th, Joey Krug - Lead Developer & Co-Founder of Augur 1 pm EST Dec 6th, Tony Sakich - Director of Marketing of Augur 1 pm EST Dec 16th, Paul Snow CEO of Factom Thanks, I was only reading through the topics section and somehow missed the schedule. https://forum.bitcoin.com/announces/bitcoin-com-ama-event-full-schedule-t1665.htmlThis looks like it will be a nice soapbox for all crypto's. |
|
|
|
I am still a big NAS stakeholder but I lost the trust into a positive development of NAS in the future. Why don't you think about of merging NAS with another NXT-based coin like HORIZON? It could be a good step to bring NAS ahead and the network will get stablizied too.
+1 Yes, please resurrect NAS. |
|
|
|
What in app color do you think would be good, we are looking to change it from Red to something more calmer & easier....Our UI designer is implementing a navy blue design but we wanted to hear other opinions. Also... The new landing page is up for testing....we will adding content SPECIFICALLY geared towards SEO. http://188.166.36.119/How Businesses Use Color to Affect Emotion webmag.co/how-businesses-use-color-to-affect-emotionColor and Web Design webmag.co/173 |
|
|
|
You have a point. I would argue that the devs have broken the rules too - namely, changing the so-called 'final' stakeholder list. That's just as much 'breaking the rules' as owning more than 1 account is.  the rules about how many stakes are allowed are more important to the rule of not changing the stake holder list. just like the the rule where i live that police do not carry guns.. if the people took arms in a civil war between the east and west would the police not arm themselves to put an end to it? some rules are supposed to be broken under certain circumstances.. this being one of them. If this particular rule is so important then can I ask why those with NEMStake tokens on the NXT AE are permitted to have more than 1 stake? Doesn't really add up. The only thing this last-minute sock-hunt will do is make a few people very, very unhappy without really benefiting NEM in the process. I *think* it's because back then, a stake cost like a tiny amount of BTC or were being given away for free in some cases, and they cost several BTC on the NXT AE now so if you want to pay the fair market price then you are welcome to buy as many as you want. However, you are not allowed to create a million fake accounts to get a ton of free/cheap stakes during that special initial investor period which was supposed to be reserved for people who actually care about NEM and not just hoarding a bunch of stakes and sitting around waiting for everyone else to make them rich so they can dump on the market and ruin everyone else's hard work. I think anyone here knows that sock puppet masters are well aware of this, essentially all we're doing now is feeding troll bait. tbh, the measures the NEM devs took to root out sock puppets i think have displayed for all BTT users how manipulated and controlled these markets can be - any new coin that doesn't implement measures to catch such underhanded, selfish acts is destined to be another coin ran by puppet masters. I'm glad the NEM devs took these measures. Thrilled, even. Agree. This will greatly benefit NEM. Less sock puppets equals less dumping after launch. |
|
|
|
Looks like a Supernet Idea Copy  Ill stick with Supernet and BTCD myself  It is quite similar indeed, even down to doing an ICO with discounts for the coins. Interesting thing is that I was in promising discussions with NHZ and they have some common people with XC The graphics they have done are pretty good, and they are explaining SuperNET quite well, even down to the usage of JSON for the RPC. I also see some coins on their list that we did not accept, but as a clone they have to have lower standards. It will be interesting to see if a SuperNET without any financial feedback will be possible. My opinion is that it takes energy to bind disparate coins together and revenue sharing, co-investment are critical parts of the SuperNET concept. Also, it is not clear what they will do with the funds raised. James Found it: "The Blocknet Foundation will pool the formidable abilities of developers and will function as an incubator, funding the creation of a development platform and multiple Blockchain 2.0 services. The Foundation will be responsible for allocating funding for this." So their fund raising is going to pay for development of their SuperNET clone and not be backing the asset at all. I wonder if the trolls will be making any issues about buywalls? Blocknet? More like CloneNET. My faith is in SuperNET! |
|
|
|
from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=684090.msg9216076#msg9216076Looks like a Supernet Idea Copy Ill stick with Supernet and BTCD myself It is quite similar indeed, even down to doing an ICO with discounts for the coins. Interesting thing is that I was in promising discussions with NHZ and they have some common people with XC The graphics they have done are pretty good, and they are explaining SuperNET quite well, even down to the usage of JSON for the RPC. I also see some coins on their list that we did not accept, but as a clone they have to have lower standards. It will be interesting to see if a SuperNET without any financial feedback will be possible. My opinion is that it takes energy to bind disparate coins together and revenue sharing, co-investment are critical parts of the SuperNET concept. Also, it is not clear what they will do with the funds raised. James Found it: "The Blocknet Foundation will pool the formidable abilities of developers and will function as an incubator, funding the creation of a development platform and multiple Blockchain 2.0 services. The Foundation will be responsible for allocating funding for this." So their fund raising is going to pay for development of their SuperNET clone and not be backing the asset at all. I wonder if the trolls will be making any issues about buywalls? So are we not going with SuperNET? NHZ + Supernet would be awesome! |
|
|
|
|
