Nice try but not necessary.

Regarding the project's Risk Management Plan (if you read), it is completely up to the team members to publish their identities, use alias, or hide their identities. Hence, they are not fake but hidden behind other names.
In addition, it is not a reasonable talk when you say someone (Laura Zaharia) is a scammer just because she has been the advisor of a scam project. We know Laura from LinkedIn as much as you know her.

We decided keep all the team members' identities hidden except for the main owner (Ali Ghobadi) and some Advisors. We cannot force the team to publish their identities since they worry about their security, as Satoshi and Monero team were.

Finally, we suggest all of you to read the project's documents and its outstanding features rather than entitling such a solid project "SCAM". Thus far, more than 10 months of research and experimental work have been performed on this project. It is not a game, scam, etc.

Yet, there has not been any evidence showing that many institutional investors are investing on crypto.

Definitely we will see huge growth for cryptos in the future.

But you did not mention any reason for your hope! Please give us some solid reasons.

Who is really hopeful about the future of Bitcoin and why?

It has a lot of doors to be knocked and grow, as you say. But I am wondering why so many people who claimed they know blockchain well do not consider it as a database. Oddly enough, it is just a data storing structure with a new method of encryption, confirmation, save, and retrieve. Is that so hard to realize?

Unfortunately, China does not a clear strategy neither on Blockchain nor on other novel technologies. I personally cannot say what exactly China is looking for. However, when it comes to people of China, things changes really. Chinese do usually their best on adapting themselves with new findings, especially if they smell financial taste.

Of course if countries support the development of crypto, it will be accelerated around the globe. But, technology does not essentially need governmental supports to live and grow. It will finally find its way.

If you say blockchain is a data storing structure, do you agree it is one the worst database produced ever? No records, no specific retrieving format, etc. Everything is stored as transactions with a huge amount of redundancy.

Why you claim such this? China is doing well about crypto currencies but there is also a list of banning activities in China. I personally think China does not know what would be the best to do about crypto, and China will not be the final winner unless it open its hug completely against crypto!

Is Blockchain a new technology or just a method of data storing?

Please refer us to a couple of solid references that support your idea.
Why do you say China does not make much effort in cryptocurrency and blockchain?
Instead, name some blockchain-based projects under development in USA.
When you provide audience with reliable references, your comment is acceptable much more.

I see most of comments are concerned about the word "competition" as the vast majority of them is saying there is no competition.
However, I had better mention to a similar competition available in economy between these two countries. We should clarify the fact that this is a kind of implicit, hidden contest among several nations; China and USA as top representative of them.
Hence, please do not repeat "there is no competition" since there is actual a big one.

Exactly, who is capable of introducing the blockchain technology into people daily life and society acceptance will hold the first position. In the meantime, we had better take the crypto into account much more than any other blockchain-based services. In my opinion, the nation that make the most adoption with crypto payment systems would be the ultimate pioneer.

When Blockchain comes to crypto, Chain and some other nations try to prevent their people from investing on. However, Blockchain is not only crypto, and there are a variety of projects all over the world using several benefits of Blockchain. From this perspective, China is one of the pioneer countries.

Not an easy consideration to say which one of these two is concerning more on regulations. USA pursues almost a fixed road to regulate the blockchain, while China is frequently changing the orientation. Yet, it is only one side of the problem, and blockchain development is not all about regulation. In fact, a variety of other perspectives should be measured such as human resource, budgeting, public acceptance, capitalist mafia, etc.

I was wondering what makes people think like this? No pioneer has remained at the first position forever. Any other countries could surpass USA even in Blockchain technology.

Could you please name those 26 blockchain projects, or refer us to a reference?