I was told my posts get deleted because this is a promotional-only thread. Going well, isn't it?  |
|
|
|
Had an itch to play some Chinese.  |
|
|
|
|
Why did SWC go for BCH anyways? Almost no one wants to hold that. ETH would have been the more logical step if you really wanted to go for alt coins, imo.
|
|
|
|
Does SwC is going to add new crypto currencies as deposit option to the site? I'm asking because it's beyond good and evil (sic!) to deposit through Bitcoin now. And on site is now only two options: Bitcoin and BCH (the things i don't have neither want to buy)
We have considered an option to offer a service to convert to other currencies during deposit and withdrawal, with play still in uBTC and uBCH. Would you play at SwC with this feature? I highly doubt more than 20% of you players have any holdings in shitcoins. The only solutions to your cashout problem is: 1) Consolidate SWC's smaller balances to a single address while the mempool is less congested. 2) Batch player withdrawals. I'm pretty sure every other gambling site does this and isn't concerned about the privacy issues. I can confirm 2, the last withdrawals I made from the largest site accepting coins had 23 and 55 outputs respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Then you cannot make the claim that moderators are different from staff or that SWCs mods do not run the site.
|
|
|
|
You can delete this 30 more times, I will repost until you come clean about endthefed and higherhighs.BIG announcement, they have BCH, lol. Not even worth logging in to see this disappointment of an update. By the way, wasn't there 1 member here who said user endthefed is 100% an employee even though he claimed not to be (but promoting tournaments in the chat the whole time). SWC also wrote here he is not staff. But yet he has green chat again, only staff has green chat. https://imgur.com/a/VnS3ePIAnother lie exposed, just like with higherhighs. Also, swc staff winning bigger tournament, interesting. https://imgur.com/a/HiDgUbe There's nothing wrong with a mod playing, don't be such a riggy. I think it actually helps having a member of the community moderate the troll box (endthefed has been around forever). quis custodiet ipsos custodes The actual staff. breaking news, 9/10 participants in gang rapes are willing. You ever wonder why exactly doctors have to take an oath? Obviously staff should be barred from playing and when they win it kicks swc's reputation in the nuts There's a difference between staff and chat moderators. Mods are part of the community, they don't run the site. How do you know who is running this site? I doubt you do. |
|
|
|
There is a bug in the OFCp Progressive games.
When you are in fantasyland and have the opportunity to play a full house on the bottom and another full house in the middle, you'll be prompted with an error message upon clicking the "Play" button. The error message reads something along the lines of: "Your hand is fouling. Are you sure you want to play this?".
Thought I was going crazy triple and quadruple checking my hand looking for the error (there wasn't one).
LOL. Why would that message even exist? Let the people foul. What's next, "You are about to go all-in with T5o on the bubble, are you sure you want to do that?!" |
|
|
|
Compare the rake before to the rake now.
I agree with you that this is a decent move (the first in literally months). But this is like saying "My favourite potato chip cost $1. The price rose to $4 per bag and after protests, the manufacturer lowered it to $3. That's great!" |
|
|
|
I mean, that's just not true. Most sites have stopped catering to micro/nano players, such as party poker, who have chosen to almost exclusively offer satellites into bigger BI tournaments for nano players. Or GG poker, who has chosen to position themselves as THE midstakes+ tournament website and has successfully created the most successful schedule online (up to 300.000 people online) - every micro tournament is either turbo or hyper here and on the other end of the spectrum, they regularly run $2650 buy-in tournaments and in cashgames, they have the super highstakes VIP games now. I mean, look at this:   And it's not remotely close to prime time right now. Or Kingsclubspkr, who up until recently had $4/$8 as their lowest limit games and positioned themselves as the place to be for non-NLHE players. Turns out a midstakes+ player is infinitely more valuable to a poker site than micro stakes players. The big issue SWC has is that they had one trademark position in the market - lowest rake - and they fucked with that, so everyone who doesn't strictly plays for fun has up and gone somewhere better. Except for Chinese, which still seems to run as there is only one real alternative, there is better options out there for every single variant now. |
|
|
|
 Who woulda thought glitch was actually the better of swc PR. Death to seals, euthanasia for anyone still playing there That link doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Seems like they permanently locked the thread, haha.
Did the strike do anything? Is is still running?
Not according to higherhighs, he expects 1000 players by the end of the year and thinks everything is going great! Don't see why you specifically would care though. |
|
|
|
|
According to the main thread, the issue has now been resolved and OP has been compensated.
Nevertheless, I would like to issue a stark warning when it comes to SWC, they have changed significantly over the last few months and entirely for the worst.
Everyone who has been around during FTP times knows what might be coming. SWC cannot be trusted anymore, as sad as that is.
|
|
|
|
|
Also, it turns out that 1000/2000 Fixed Limit and 1000/2000 No Limit are not the same category of stakes.
This was pointed out when 3.0 launched, by the way.
|
|
|
|
Straight from the horse's mouth, Even the guy I played admits it was a legit game. I think it's time you stop with the lies. "95k chips was all stolen. And for 85k chips i came back to play, so chips in few games was only partial stolen when i was in sit-out at start of 3 tournaments. So swc did 95k chips refund, it sounds fear for me" -NoFloat Now I played him for one 50k game and won, so can you do the simple math here? or should I do it for you? https://twitter.com/CYlzNpetcQ78IcN/status/1351554860190076928The game is over. Great! Now imagine how much better it would have looked for SWC it would have looked if they had posted this. And we will put xGoodfella down as only a 95k thief then, fair enough. |
|
|
|
ok man I'm done with this, you are trying to twist things up and cause confusion and chaos. The game was played out I did not cheat nothing was done here. SwC has already made their ruling on this and they are the judge jury and executioner. I wish you the best.
Yes, and we would just like to know what that ruling was. I don't think that's too much to ask. |
|
|
|
|
Because it benefits the site to have an official policy with regards to this, regardless of who asks.
Do you really think this highstakes regular will keep playing on SWC if he knows had thieves and scammers go unpunished?
But thank you to bring attention back to this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe that's because you cannot behave in a reasonable manner. Mine was left up (so far).
I do have to say, I would also still like to know what happened with that. $6k isn't exactly chump change and an official policy statement would be great, given you wanna improve communication.
|
|
|
|
 This has happened to me before (for smaller amounts), I was not compensated. What is the policy here, SWC had an outage that multiple people can vouch for. Please atleast auto-unreg people who lost connection. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
