 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
New update: Trade ZITOKEN (ZIT) on ForkDelta https://forkdelta.app/#!/trade/0x9c04f0dc68c61efd2fc289987393a78b4a2494ea-ETH |
|
|
|
|
FORMAL ANNOUNCEMENT December 22th, 2019:
Zitoken Team is developing a new function for our partnership program with gaming industry and integrated on our crowdfunding platform, in which will allow game lovers to track coupons.
|
|
|
|
FORMAL ANNOUNCEMENT November 17th, 2019: Our first version of Zitoken Platform is live! Beta test is running with high performace  |
|
|
|
Telegram/Twitter Airdrop FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY. Thank you everyone |
|
|
|
Official links: WEBSITE WHITEPAPER GITHUB TWITTER TELEGRAM BITCOINTALK THREAD AIRDROP FOR CONTENT CREATORS (Youtubers, Bloggers, Journalists)
Please, read carefully all rules- All participants need to be original, video content or written content - This Airdrop ends in july 31th,2019 REWARDS : Between 500 - 2.500 Tokens per content (depends on quality and engagement) RULES: • For video creators (youtubers) , you must have at least 1.200 subscribers on your Youtube channel and your video should be 2+ minutes long, only one video can attend the campaign • For written content creators (journalists,bloggers), your articles must be posted on websites and platforms with minimum 1.000 daily visitors, Minimum of 700 characters required and must contain graphic material, only one article can attend the campaign
• You should to create a positive review about our cause, and include website link https://www.zitoken.me and Telegram group https://t.me/zitoken on every article or video
• FILL THIS FORM TO SUBMIT HERE
• Also valid for Steemit and Medium (only)
• Not valid for Facebook, Blogspot, Twitter, Golos or any Forum
|
|
|
|
And what benefits for investors here? I mean what will get investors who invest in such games? Will they get some % of profit from this games? At last from what I noticed - games on blokchains not popular nowdays...
Indeed. Nowadays Blockchain Games are not popular, this is one of the reasons on which we decide to create Zitoken Project, we are committed to help blockchain games become popular Our main mission is not only to support the development of blockchain games, but also their mass adoption, our Crowdfunding will be a great channel to bring this games (Dapps) to real world. |
|
|
|
And what benefits for investors here? I mean what will get investors who invest in such games? Will they get some % of profit from this games? At last from what I noticed - games on blokchains not popular nowdays...
Thanks for your questions magisterr. Great points! Soon our crowdfunding platform will be open for campaign creators/game developers and backers. Any game developer will need to inform in advance, before we approve any campaign about Which rewards will be offered for contributors, How this rewards will be delivered and When will be delivered. Zitoken Project will offer rewards in ZIT our utility token to support the development of the first games as well. |
|
|
|
We are sharing some criterias used by us before to approve any campaign and to release funds: 1. Full details about team and company behind the game 2. Only ideias about games are not accepted 3. It's required to have developed at least 30% of the game or Beta Version 4. Campaign creator need to be approved on our KYC process 5. Until Q4 2019 we will be accepting only games developed on Ethereum Blockchain Replying to your point 1 and 4 Combined, all of the people on the project will need to perform KYC? And I'm very unclear about point 2, ideas about game are not acceptable? So on what category should they build their project on? About point 2 ( games wth 0% of development will be rejected, no chance to be approved ). |
|
|
|
We are sharing some criterias used by us before to approve any campaign and to release funds: 1. Full details about team and company behind the game 2. Only ideias about games are not accepted 3. It's required to have developed at least 30% of the game or Beta Version 4. Campaign creator need to be approved on our KYC process 5. Until Q4 2019 we will be accepting only games developed on Ethereum Blockchain Replying to your point 1 and 4 Combined, all of the people on the project will need to perform KYC? And I'm very unclear about point 2, ideas about game are not acceptable? So on what category should they build their project on? Point 1 and 4, only the campaign creator need to perform our KYC process, but we investage all members and their roles behind the game. |
|
|
|
I think we was much clear about "why" the change and to launch it in the market...The main vision of this model is to benefit not one or two games, the main vision of this model is to benefit all ecossystem of blockchain games Then I'll take this as a confirmation that you'll stick to this model disregarding any future demands from your "community" and proceed to discuss about this model. First of all, this crowdfunding certainly will work like an escrow where the funds collected will only be released to developer if certain criteria are met? Exactly. Each game campaign will have its own Escrow Account, the main advantage of Escrow Account in our case is transparency, because any backer can check the balance in public mode during all campaign, and of course security of the funds as well. Each developer/campaign creator will need to pass for the AML/KYC process as criteria before to receive any amount. Ok, and what wil be the milestone or criteria for the escrow to release funds? In spite of having manually filtering game, there still rooms for unfortunate events like game failed to be developed or worse, fraud that's built on a really neat scheme We are sharing some criterias used by us before to approve any campaign and to release funds: 1. Full details about team and company behind the game 2. Only ideias about games (games wth 0% of development will be rejected) 3. It's required to have developed at least 30% of the game or Beta Version 4. Campaign creator need to be approved on our KYC process 5. Until Q4 2019 we will be accepting only games developed on the following Blockchain Protocols: EOS, Ethereum, Tron |
|
|
|
|
An additional information, all game campaigns approved are filtered manually to avoid frauds and suspect schemes...
|
|
|
|
I think we was much clear about "why" the change and to launch it in the market...The main vision of this model is to benefit not one or two games, the main vision of this model is to benefit all ecossystem of blockchain games Then I'll take this as a confirmation that you'll stick to this model disregarding any future demands from your "community" and proceed to discuss about this model. First of all, this crowdfunding certainly will work like an escrow where the funds collected will only be released to developer if certain criteria are met? Exactly. Each game campaign will have its own Escrow Account, the main advantage of Escrow Account in our case is transparency, because any backer can check the balance in public mode during all campaign, and of course security of the funds as well. Each developer/campaign creator will need to pass for the AML/KYC process as criteria before to receive any amount. |
|
|
|
I think we was much clear about "why" the change and to launch it in the market...The main vision of this model is to benefit not one or two games, the main vision of this model is to benefit all ecossystem of blockchain games |
|
|
|
good hard work this project will be succes hopefully do that
Thanks for your support... |
|
|
|
You are most welcome to give your feedback on our project. Regarding clear information about change, our team had been talking to a wide range of people and consumers interested specially on blockchain games on geek events.
We realised that previous model it was not attending pains of the market based in this informations , the main difficult of game developers is to get support for their games and to be conneceted with games lovers.
So we decided to change it for an innovator and pioneer model, on which support this niche.
Well ok, which blockchain game event was this? I can't find your project being mentioned on any event, perhaps you can give an evidence in form of your team's nametag on said event(s)? And I shall assume as the community had decided that this is the best suited model, this is the final and it will not be replaced with other projects anymore? Be advised that the change happened in a mix of opinions, stratregies and pains of the market as we explained, events it was only one of our channels. We mentioned geek events, right? When we mention geek events we are refering to local communities, not big events such as GamesBeat Summit . Also be informed that we never participed as an Exhibitor or Sponsor, even because our focus it was research. This is the final version to be launched in the market... |
|
|
|
Well, now this is a worrying answer. What'll guarantee that you will not change your business activity once more? Deeming this "funding" as another failed test and move to other plan? it'll be troublesome for investors who studied your recent plan, think it is worth investing, buy some tokens, and then you once again go under for two months and resurface with "ok, the funding is not working, now we're proposing a paid online game reviewing".
Your points are valid, but remember this is a product based on feedback of our community and a hard work of a lot of study and research , and regarding the funding of Zitoken, team is investing their own capital to deliver the product. Interesting, you imply that the change happen as a result of community's feedback, thus their request. Can you please tell us on what platform does this request and feedback occurred? Your bitcointalk thread were quiet for months prior to the change, your telegram is far even more concerning, created on January (and unless you deleted every chat prior) only active from the past few days, which is post-change, and topic is about airdrop. Even more interesting, you mentioned that study and research also took a role on the change. While this is a positive thing for projects to grow, exception can always be made for project that took a whole different new course (and worse, happen before the previous idea even implemented), because we can infer that (because the concept is completely different from previous one) the previous one are not well thought, studied, or researched. Because, if you did your research and study, or even a simple thorough thought, then the change will be around tweaking the project instead of completely change them. And about team, I'm glad you mentioned it, who are the team anyway? I don't see them anywhere. Dear Miiike, Thanks for your feedback. Well, experiments are only experiments, not officials produtcs, and what we are announcing here is an official product indeed. Regarding the team, we'll be glad if you check it out our whitepaper or website and look for "Team" , all members mencioned makes part of our businness, we are still small, but we'll be hiring new members in other stages of our business. Initially you said that this project is based on community's feedback, which we can concur that the project's change is due to their request, but there were no evidence of such request, given your medias are all inactive for months before. You also said that the product is based on hard work of a lot of studies and research, which I'll be fair if we agree that the total "reconstruction" happen as a result of poor judgment on previous model (which should allow us to ask why such poor judgment happen in spite of the "hard work" of studies and research or question your competence) or that it happens because you didn't do your self acclaimed hard work of studies and research at all (which should entitle us to ask about team seriousness of the project, thus credibility). It's also interesting to highlight how you state that experiments are just experiments, and not official product, (because) what you announce here is an official product. Now you became ambiguous. Previous model were explained here, as it used to be announced here, and because it is implied that experiments were not announced here, your statement should lead to a conclusion that the said model is an official product, yet it was totally deconstructed as if it was a failed experiment. There were not even a clear and official info about why the change. You don't even announce the change, you simply went under and resurface with whole different project, and pretend nothing happened previously. You are most welcome to give your feedback on our project. Regarding clear information about change, our team had been talking to a wide range of people and consumers interested specially on blockchain games on geek events. We realised that previous model it was not attending pains of the market based in this informations , the main difficult of game developers is to get support for their games and to be conneceted with games lovers. So we decided to change it for an innovator and pioneer model, on which support this niche. |
|
|
|
Well, now this is a worrying answer. What'll guarantee that you will not change your business activity once more? Deeming this "funding" as another failed test and move to other plan? it'll be troublesome for investors who studied your recent plan, think it is worth investing, buy some tokens, and then you once again go under for two months and resurface with "ok, the funding is not working, now we're proposing a paid online game reviewing".
Your points are valid, but remember this is a product based on feedback of our community and a hard work of a lot of study and research , and regarding the funding of Zitoken, team is investing their own capital to deliver the product. Interesting, you imply that the change happen as a result of community's feedback, thus their request. Can you please tell us on what platform does this request and feedback occurred? Your bitcointalk thread were quiet for months prior to the change, your telegram is far even more concerning, created on January (and unless you deleted every chat prior) only active from the past few days, which is post-change, and topic is about airdrop. Even more interesting, you mentioned that study and research also took a role on the change. While this is a positive thing for projects to grow, exception can always be made for project that took a whole different new course (and worse, happen before the previous idea even implemented), because we can infer that (because the concept is completely different from previous one) the previous one are not well thought, studied, or researched. Because, if you did your research and study, or even a simple thorough thought, then the change will be around tweaking the project instead of completely change them. And about team, I'm glad you mentioned it, who are the team anyway? I don't see them anywhere. Dear Miiike, Thanks for your feedback. Well, experiments are only experiments, not officials produtcs, and what we are announcing here is an official product indeed. Regarding the team, we'll be glad if you check it out our whitepaper or website and look for "Team" , all members mencioned makes part of our businness, we are still small, but we'll be hiring new members in other stages of our business. |
|
|
|
I see that there were no mention about arbit anymore, the experiment failed? In fact, I felt like reading a whole different project, like you removed the entire old plan and propose something new. To be fair, I failed to recall correctly as your thread's last active discussion was around 4 months ago, but I don't think it was initially about game crowdfunding?
Thanks for your comment. As you can see we adappated our business model for a solid product, changes are mandatory at any experiment or business on which plans are to deliver a real use case to support people and business, and this is our case. Err... Yeah, business is everchanging, but I don't think a we-propose-an-in-game-token-that-will-also-get-dividend-from-our-untested-arbit-system to we-only-crowdfund-game-now can be considered as adapting market. It's more like developing a whole different project. The only thing that connect you with your "old project" was it's on the same sector (game) as what it become today. For all we know, the dev team (if there any team at all) might be completely different as well with the ones from beginning Our main focus always it was game industry since the beginning, this means that we keep our values. As you just comment, we only tested experiments in the past. Well, now this is a worrying answer. What'll guarantee that you will not change your business activity once more? Deeming this "funding" as another failed test and move to other plan? it'll be troublesome for investors who studied your recent plan, think it is worth investing, buy some tokens, and then you once again go under for two months and resurface with "ok, the funding is not working, now we're proposing a paid online game reviewing". Your points are valid, but remember this is a product based on feedback of our community and a hard work of a lot of study and research , and regarding the funding of Zitoken, team is investing their own capital to deliver the product. |
|
|
|
|
