 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
6) To motivate big investors, there is a suggestion: theoretically it takes no longer than 1 month to implement SmartLikes, a dev mebagger2 already knows the algo, he can do that (we need his agreement though) - it's quite likely that if he agrees to implement SmartLikes in the nearest future, big Mooncoin investors will become optimistic and will agree to pay these 316M to Coinexchange.
Provided that if he agrees to implement SmartLikes within a month, I can donate 116M to Coinexchange. |
|
|
|
So your answer: the link posted provides the necessary info about delisting yes or no?
hmzz dont see it poppin up there?'
The answer of coin exchange is as it reads No good transactions of what (unlegitemed coins or stolen coins being sold?)
the last time ive transferred coins from sato to coinexchange the confirmations where quadrupled!
it took HOURS to transfer ...so whats up with that? is that the new way?
As a matter of exchanges there should be way more !
The reason in my opinion is: it adds coin value to use
In previous posts i'm supporting this matter
the coin at one exchange devalues it because it isnt a usable coin (but merley to put money in it)
it loses usability as a transfering coin.
But let's debate what other functions it provides
www.coinexchange.io does not plan to delisting MOON, you can see for yourself - https://www.coinexchange.io/delistings/page/1 |
|
|
|
Hi guys, can you give reasons to invest in the moon project?
In fact, all the large wallets are inactive for a very long time, even when there was an increase to 7 satoshi (while Bitcoin was more than $17 000). I do not know what happened to the owners of these wallets, maybe they lost their wallets, maybe they are not alive, or maybe they are waiting for 250 satoshi. It is important that, this suggests that these wallets will not interfere with the price increase. The number of actual coins is much less than that of the same dogecoin. There was an unpleasant moment with the stolen coins from the Cryptsy, but now it is known who owns these coins, so this is more of a plus than a minus. We have an active community, there are promising ideas for development, SmartLikes, MoonWord and others. These are not empty words - some time ago, the community outlined beta versions of these technologies, but because of insufficient usability at that time they were returned for revision. I think they will soon be presented in a proper way. In many ways this coin is significantly better than the others and it is highly underestimated. I think this is temporary. |
|
|
|
Good job! That means you're one of the morons who contributed to it's massively decreased price since you didn't have the good sense to hold long to support
it's rising sats at the time. But hey, you made some fiat, right? *golfclap*
MOON has mainly been in a sub-satoshi position for the last 4 years. But you knew that since you 'know how the market works'. So why are you saying the sky
is falling all of the sudden? Specifically?
I think you should not call morons people who sell their coins. No need to reproach people for what they sell. People are weak. We must create conditions for them to buy. A year ago, Mooncoin was worth $0.0000008, now the Mooncoin costs $0.000097. That is, the growth for the year was 12 125 %! Mooncoin is dead?! Ha! But they still have a chance to jump into the rocket. It's just the beginning. News will change everything. |
|
|
|
Yes, dev sell all his billion coins at 1 sathoshi and make thousands of dollars. And you buy it. Dev work so hard, that he can't answer etc.  My 30 million coins are sold. yes I thought i was. they get rid of the moon money that was bought years ago. If they wanted to sell, they would sell for 5-8 satoshi. We are waiting for updates. |
|
|
|
It was us who got us into C-CEX, it was us working our asses off to shill and promote.
No, I personally paid 49 million Mooncoin for voting C-CEX (0.00000002btc/moon; 0,98 btc - It is more than 2000 $) (with assistance Mooncoin_Foundation). And in your Discord, I have not met with support on this issue. |
|
|
|
These were your very first posts in the Discord right after the original logo contest was over. Remember?
And I'm completely right here. I can repeat this another 1000 times, this will not change the essence. |
|
|
|
I'm excited to hear what other well-respected community-members for years think about this above posting.
Sorry, had to answer this. Over and out.
This, undoubtedly, is an unsubstantiated insult. |
|
|
|
One Problem:
Moon Jan 2014 0,000137$
Moon June 2017 0,000087$
Questions ?
Litecoin Nov 2013 53$ Litecoin June 2017 40$ |
|
|
|
I wasn't obligated to do so or was I? Do you know why "I" donated? To reveal your level of compassion, do you care to know why I donated?
I did not make this site for money, we did not stipulate a fee. Then there were some donations, including yours. You did not have to pay, it's your voluntary choice. You got better what I did, you decided to support me, sending MOON. I appreciate it. |
|
|
|
@Nico, just a question, do you know what this is?  Does this mean anything to you? If so please enlighten me on what it means to you. Of course. Mooncoin_Foundation suggested me make a graphic theme for the start page, after I made these pages, Mooncoin_Foundation asked in the Mooncoin thread to donate Mooncoins for my work. You sent 1,000,000 MOON, this is $4 at that time (the price was $0.000004/MOON). |
|
|
|
Regarding mooncoin it would be good if there were members who could take more important roles. I proposed in the discord group that we must have a board of "executives", members who hodl more than 20 mil coins. Because I must agree with you I don't want moon to be coordinated with people who own less than 10 mil, or even 1 mil. After all, if I invested some money I would like to see that we're going somewehere.
I have the same worry. |
|
|
|
Who said holding more MOON puts anyone above the rest? Democracy is about equality - no matter if you have 1000, a million or a billion coins.
That is, you say - we do not care about investors and their money! What we will solve here in a narrow circle, and we will not ask your opinion, and if we ask, we do not care how much you invested. The vote of the person who invested $ 0.01 in the MOON == vote of the person who invested $ 100000 in the MOON? Are you serious? The level of risk in making a decision is not comparable. You will scare away all potential big investors. Someone wants to invest big money in MOON after that? |
|
|
|
The approach was quite simple, this is a decentralized system that we all choose to support. It's important that if there are issues on certain matters, we utilize democracy. What I will not do is represent a dictatorship, it's different if a couple of people talked about the logo and didn't like it only stating opinions. But as Mooncoin ad campaigns continued and the community grew, it got to the point where something had to be done. So in the decentralized system the best way to settle the matter was competition where democracy could take place. I don't throw around the "title" of marketing director as if I'm above anyone, we are all equal including myself and I do my best to demonstrate that. I was totally fine with Nico's logo, however, Nico's logo was bested, because of the most recent events, we as a community should "ALL" continue using the discord channel as a voting platform. Perhaps we should change the logo based on a consensus the next go around. No one is totally wrong for what has transpired, we all must remember that we are still growing as a community, just as is the whole cryptoworld. Next time something of this nature comes to pass, I encourage everyone to utilize their democratic privileges. Not every coin community es decentralized, this is what makes Moon special, we must continue to strive for improvement and growth. #PeaceandProgress
Democracy is when every member of the community has a number of votes in a voting proportional to his investment in a Mooncoin. This is a common practice. We do not even know whether the MOON-investors were on that voting. How can such a voting be considered legitimate? |
|
|
|
|
Now the voting does not take into account the participant's weight, a person with 100 MOON has the same value as a person with 1 million MOON.
This is illogical and wrong. Moreover, even a person who does not have a MOON can vote, which is absurd.
I think that voting should be conducted taking into account the weight of the participant. The person who invested more money in MOON has more weight. He risks big money.
It is very easy to implement, just make an MOON-address, write some minimal random amount (1-1000 MOON) and then send it to this MOON-address. This will be the verification of the voting participant.
Without this, any vote is invalid, because The voter can be without a MOON at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, guys! You have fun here, but the work does not wait.
|
|
|
|
Can i see both logos here?
Of course! Nico's  Larrimar's  Used my logo without my participation It was Evangelo who entered your logo for you.  Another logo has 5 variants of the outline, but I have 1 unsuccessful screenshot. Not good. |
|
|
|
|
- 
