I won't risk my money on your site. Why should i risk my money to a scam site?

Something tells me that MaltaGames/ruby1989 and ladygaga2000 are the same person and that the 116 BTC txid is just a random transaction they picked to use as proof.

Very weak and unethical tactics to lure players.

With satoshi, (LOL)

---

You already know to whom i reffering

Giving positive feedback to your own alt account isn't legit.

---

So, you even talking to them through telegram? Instead using the support ticket or pm from website, both of you seems close talking through on other social media

SUPPORT KEEP IGNORING ME, AND WENT AWAY ON LIVE-CHAT + BETS PROOF:
https://imgur.com/a/U1Srp6V

Hmm, seems like there is a drama on here.

---

You paid him over $1,1 M and how did you verified his KYC only in 8 minutes?
where did you got another 36 btc? You have said you only around 80 btc as your bankroll.

There is something fishy on here
More likely another fake vouch like he did with his alt account

No any KYC terms in your ToS.
I give you 24hr from now for funds withdrawal, otherwise - i write to MGA.

Archived for possible future reference and to avoid the site altering the public stats later: http://archive.is/J1zE0

How could you allow a user to win 125BTC when you can only cover 80BTC?
Why did you accept bets after your bankroll had already been drained?
Didn't you have any stop mechanism in place that reduced the max bets as your bankroll was drained,
or at least stopped accepting new bets once the player had won 80BTC and you knew you couldn't cover any possible profit from additional bets?

Why? What does the fact change that they are? What will you do differently if they aren't?
Do you treat players differently based on their reputation on other sites?
Would you scam someone who hasn't made a name for themselves yet because you can get away with it more easily?

Never experienced something like that, how much i win, are you sure everything with your game are okay?

That's today, and yesterday, and the day before. What about last week, last month?
How long have you been making bitcoin transactions? And I mean daily, a huge amount of them, for customers that are waiting on you?
The situation around transaction fees and block size is pretty chill right now, but it would be foolish to expect it to remain like this indefinitely.
Do you have a contingency plan, for when fee averages shoot up, because the transaction load increases. For when it suddenly becomes way more expensive to consolidate your small inputs?
I can't see the future, maybe we're lucky and fees stay like this or lower for a long while, however the possibility exists, and we've seen extreme fee levels in the past, so you should be prepared for them.
With the current setup you are running, your service will be significantly more impacted by a rise in the fee market than most, if not all, other services. And it's already been bad for everyone else in the past.
Feel free to ignore my warning, or give it some thought and consider to be prepared, rather than stumbling blindly in a crippling situation.

Ok, how are your 20,000 addresses generated? What source of entropy did you use for them?
Creating 20,000 addresses sounds like a huge task, convenience allows us to generate a batch of addresses from a single source, using hierarchical deterministic wallets.
Are your 20,000 addresses fully independent addresses, or are they part of one or several HD wallets?

It's a cost/benefit calculation to make, and imho, yours doesn't come out on the benefit side of things.
I would also suspect that it isn't that hard to identify funds that come from your service. Harder than when not doing any of the things you do, for sure, but not hard enough, and certainly not impossible.
I'd wager a skilled blockchain detective can unmask your whole setup with little to no work. Hell, I by no means am one, but would give myself a fair stab at it.

That brings my example down from 44kB to 22kB, that is still bad. Both for you and the network in general.
I guess it's not as bad as the calculation I did, but it's also not really a response to my whole point, it's just an adjustment for what I calculated.
The principle point I made still stands.

So...all 80BTC connected to the live servers? I asked about that in my earlier post (the first half, you might have missed it).

I'd challenge that, given how Bitcoin is a fully public ledger and chainanalysis can be a b*tch. But that's something for another time, maybe.

The way I read it, your full bankroll is stored in a wallet that is connected to your life servers, as you use it for hot-wallet purposes, is that correct?
You say you store your bankroll this way for anonymity purposes, which means you work with a single wallet structure, no separation between hot-wallets and cold-wallets, correct?
Mow I can see the argument being made that at 80BTC all funds are needed to provide a reliable hot-wallet,
but I'd disagree and point out the low transaction load, thus room to secure parts of the bankroll in a more traditional way.

That sounds unpractical, and wasteful in terms of block space.
Also, it might directly go against your second highest priority (anonymity), unless you strictly prohibit address reuse, and even then it might not be enough.

Have you played out some test scenarios with this setup to see how it impacts yourself and the bitcoin blockchain?

Say I deposit 0.5 BTC, get lucky and win 0.5 BTC, now I want to withdraw 1BTC, that would result in a transaction having 250 inputs from your end.
Let's assume we're operating on the "standard" address half of your bankroll (I guess that means non-segwit & p2sh or p2pkh), I'll use p2pkh in my calculation as worst case example:
each input would amount to 180 bytes of transaction size, two outputs a 34 bytes, and 10 bytes overhead.
Sum it up and you get 180*250+76=45076 bytes -> 44.02kB That's a shitton of data for one single transaction.
Now let's say you're using a fee of 0.0003BTC/kB (source: BTC.com average over the last days; yeah, it should be WU now, but whatever, bear with my and my legacy calculation),
That would amount to transaction fees of 0.0132BTC for this withdrawal. Do you charge that fee to the customer?
Do you send the withdrawal with a significantly lower fee, resulting in it taking ages to confirm during high network traffic times?
Or do you eat the fees yourselves, providing a nice experience for your customer, but costing yourself dearly in transaction fees, especially if several of those transactions happen in a short time.


On a side note (wrapping back to the first point): With that withdrawal, you just linked 250 of your 20,000 addresses together, someone who knows the transaction was sent by you (like the user issuing it) can now go and analyze 250 addresses, the way you funneled the funds into the addresses, where they came from, find similar addresses that were connected in earlier transactions, or just analyze the pattern and see where it repeats.
Your 20,000 address setup might not increase anonymity at all, and given the huge overhead it comes with, I'd question whether it's worth it or not.

I'd challenge that, given how Bitcoin is a fully public ledger and chainanalysis can be a b*tch. But that's something for another time, maybe.

The way I read it, your full bankroll is stored in a wallet that is connected to your life servers, as you use it for hot-wallet purposes, is that correct?
You say you store your bankroll this way for anonymity purposes, which means you work with a single wallet structure, no separation between hot-wallets and cold-wallets, correct?
Mow I can see the argument being made that at 80BTC all funds are needed to provide a reliable hot-wallet,
but I'd disagree and point out the low transaction load, thus room to secure parts of the bankroll in a more traditional way.

That sounds unpractical, and wasteful in terms of block space.
Also, it might directly go against your second highest priority (anonymity), unless you strictly prohibit address reuse, and even then it might not be enough.

Have you played out some test scenarios with this setup to see how it impacts yourself and the bitcoin blockchain?

Say I deposit 0.5 BTC, get lucky and win 0.5 BTC, now I want to withdraw 1BTC, that would result in a transaction having 250 inputs from your end.
Let's assume we're operating on the "standard" address half of your bankroll (I guess that means non-segwit & p2sh or p2pkh), I'll use p2pkh in my calculation as worst case example:
each input would amount to 180 bytes of transaction size, two outputs a 34 bytes, and 10 bytes overhead.
Sum it up and you get 180*250+76=45076 bytes -> 44.02kB That's a shitton of data for one single transaction.
Now let's say you're using a fee of 0.0003BTC/kB (source: BTC.com average over the last days; yeah, it should be WU now, but whatever, bear with my and my legacy calculation),
That would amount to transaction fees of 0.0132BTC for this withdrawal. Do you charge that fee to the customer?
Do you send the withdrawal with a significantly lower fee, resulting in it taking ages to confirm during high network traffic times?
Or do you eat the fees yourselves, providing a nice experience for your customer, but costing yourself dearly in transaction fees, especially if several of those transactions happen in a short time.


On a side note (wrapping back to the first point): With that withdrawal, you just linked 250 of your 20,000 addresses together, someone who knows the transaction was sent by you (like the user issuing it) can now go and analyze 250 addresses, the way you funneled the funds into the addresses, where they came from, find similar addresses that were connected in earlier transactions, or just analyze the pattern and see where it repeats.
Your 20,000 address setup might not increase anonymity at all, and given the huge overhead it comes with, I'd question whether it's worth it or not.

Let me give you a primer:
You claim to have a 80BTC bankroll, and you state in the OP that the bankroll information can be checked with customer support.
Now it would be a waste of everyone's time if every potential player has to verify your solvency one by one with your support.
It's fairly standard for new casinos to provide signed messages from their coldwallet addresses to show they hold enough reserves.
Having a traceable verified bankroll gives your casino some legitimacy, something you struggle for right now.

Message: This account is #10,978 wallet address from #20,000 addresses from MaltaGames.eu
Address: 1EAFaKrrcPQzVvAtEJGuX74SEgZAaVnXPL
Key: H6PXqK6tnnUFlJvahgYVZHwLdq58m6Rm1aRoV0LYHY2HMqk/WhP/hoDO6WOfrA4dFTHIKLLmKofcWLIrt0zk+d0=

You have spent a lot of money and time on this business but you make a very bad start by shilling your own site. My doubt is right that you are not a real player because you are just a shill account. You have just busted your own project by the mistake IMO. It seems that you have so big expectation on this business but the result is not like what you expect, that's why you try to make it looks good by shilling it but that's become a boomerang for yourself. It is indeed not too late to get better result but you need to prove that you are legit gambling site owner, don't make mistake again and be honest on anything related your business.

Lol i already suspected OP with this post. That's almost impossible for new person who won lot just in short time after this thread announced. (The 10 minutes is the most suspicious thing though).
You were tried to lure people by fake winnings from your alt account to gamble on your site, that's a big NO for me.

P.S goodluck with your ruby account, why don't make it has 100 btc profit on your site?

---

Just a note for other gambler, you need 0.002 as minimum withdrawal. You need make x8 before you can withdraw

Would be nice to get an overview of the games without registration, i wont register just to see which games do you offer. Are there any plans to support other cryptos next to bitcoin in the future?

Would be nice to get an overview of the games without registration, i wont register just to see which games do you offer. Are there any plans to support other cryptos next to bitcoin in the future?

So, you are the same person as MaltaGames? Well, that makes things clear. And these are probably all fake, just to lure people to your website:





Not cool at all, dude. @Everyone: Be aware.