Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 05:10:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Economy / Reputation / Re: Chuckbuck is talking to himself, abusing merit, a farm house of alt on: May 11, 2020, 12:24:36 AM
And this guy later claimed that he is not a newbie but he is Chuckbuck- http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5408/54081140.html


Ok, how SourLemonX knew that ChuckBuck is banned?
I acknowledge that Importance is my secondary account, I used it to inform my service topic (I was banned for 7 days  Roll Eyes), the message that my account is locked and some information related to my service. This is the topic that I made the announcement: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233635.msg54050143#msg54050143 (The post has been deleted, but I believe you can find it in LoyceV's database)

YOU ACKNOWLEDGE EVADING A BAN RIGHT ?
2  Economy / Reputation / Re: PM from betnomi. on: April 17, 2020, 09:26:43 AM
But it doesn't mean I will have to handle any campaign who have tagged by multiple DT members (just ignore my tag). I wouldn't mind if any site become scam after you took work. On that case you might stop campaign immediately. But they were accused from beginning and punished from multiple DT members. I wouldn't ignore them since accusations is valid and I respect to the trust system. That's the reason I ignore their offer.

I see that a lot of trusted members including yourself are now promoting Best Change, a platform that was almost giving no chance for existing at all on the forum and the first reason why they were flagged was simply because they were considered high paying (without using escrow) for a new campaign with many slots, only Royse777 most noticeably and few members were fighting that they deserve a fair (even though you might argue he wasn't being objective because he applied already) and that lead to a lot of backlash which includes you excluding Him from your trust network. So, that brings about my question what if Royse777 and just a very few members then had not voiced that Best Change also need fair chance ? That'd have been one less platform on the forum, right ?

I agree with yahoo62278 on this matter, if a project is a actually scam, when they are found out, they will definitely leave and come back with another name we can't recognize to continue the scam. But Betnomi didn't do that, they realized their wrong and had developed their project for over a year, no money was taken away from users with an ICO. No money was donated nor any money was stolen. So no matter who the team behind Betnomi is, they've done everything on their own. They invest effort and money in their website, so, why can't we give them a chance to operate transparently here? The trust cannot be proved in a day, two days or a week, but it can be proved for months, years. They rushed to text a lot of people here, but just let them know they shouldn't do it, an advice on how to work on this forum would be better than a criticism. Time will tell whether they're trustworthy or fraudsters  Wink

I could not agree less with you. All it would have cost them is a new domain name, why go through this route of redemption then ?


In essence, PM and red trust, @betnomi, I feel upset over the PM done by @betnomi, clearly @betnomi won negative trust from trusted DT members in handling fraud cases.

Mostly BS...

They approach was wrong, the intention maybe not.

Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!