Exclusion reason of Royse777

[The Cryptovator]

Although I am not obliged to describe about my trust list but I want to share why I excluded Royse777 from my custom trust list. Reasons are below.

1. Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system: I think everyone know BestChange story, he/she had left counter feedback to BestChange with green trust which was not appropriate according to most of DT members. That was fine he withdrawn his/her green trust when realized it was wrong. So I can say he/she doesn't have enough knowledge how should use feedback. (However, perhaps he learned lately).

2. Retaliatory mentality, I am assuming Royse777 had excluded YOSHIE since he was thread opener against BestChange. I don't know exact reason why he/she have excluded me from his/her trust list, nor I will ask to him/her. But I believe I had not supported his counter feedback for BestChange and likely that's why he/she excluded me. If so really this is poor mentality but its depend on his/her who will be on his trust list. Also don't  know reason exclusion of TalkStar as well since TalkStar still trust Royse777 judgment. So personally I believe that kind of retaliatory mind won't fit on trust network.

So by considering both reason I have decided to exclude Royse777 from my trust list. I don't have complain about him/her, because he/she isn't obliged to explain about his own trust list. Both of reason is my personal opinion, it won't match with all over DT members and of course I appreciate everyone individual thoughts. I share it with community because other DT members would add him on their trust list or would exclude him from their trust list. But personally I think his/her judgment isn't perfect for DT network.

Here you can see his/her trust list.

Royse777 Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (6420 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. OgNasty (Trust: +62 / =2 / -5) (758 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Cloudbet (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (97 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. suchmoon (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (41) 3545 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. DaveF (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. LoyceV (Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (50) 4590 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. The Pharmacist (Trust: +24 / =2 / -0) (2305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. DarkStar_ (Trust: +43 / =1 / -0) (1204 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. eddie13 (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 811 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Raja_MBZ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (693 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. hacker1001101001 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -2) (242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. DdmrDdmr (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3218 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Royse777 Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Blazr (Trust: #  +1 / =2 / -3) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -1) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~vlom (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (112 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~game-protect (Trust: !!!:  +0 / =3 / -46) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~johnsmithx (Trust: +0 / =2 / -1) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~mosprognoz (Trust: +7 / =1 / -1) (DT1 (-5) 161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~Coolcryptovator (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (1094 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~TalkStar (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~YOSHIE (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Royse777's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. DaveF (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (956 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Raja_MBZ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (693 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. akhjob (Trust: neutral) (223 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. TalkStar (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 1miau (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. The-One-Above-All (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -17) (56 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Royse777's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. TMAN (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (1233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -1) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. morvillz7z (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW YOSHIE (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Removed elmanchez (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.

I did whatever should I, anyone could do what they think. I don't like any arguments and drama. Perhaps someone would think why I have excluded him/her? Because point number two noticed just yesterday and I was quite busy and was not able to make post. I don't think we should exclude any person just for single disagreement on a subject.  If so then we should exclude 80% user of forum. This forum is for discussion and should be agreement & disagreements.  Sometimes even we do not agree with admin, it doesn't means we have to exclude him. I am not telling I am trusted person, but can say trusted more than who joined forum Today (newbie).

[1715071019]

1715071019

[1715071019]

1715071019

[1715071019]

1715071019

[1715071019]

1715071019

[1715071019]

1715071019

[AB de Royse777]

Was anyone asking you to give an explanation to exclude me? Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

Edit:
Just a curios question: What is your beaf against me? Because I excluded you and talkStar ?

One of you are the one who include users in their trust list and ask for indirect favour in return in PM.
There are some users who are in this community with certain goals to achieve for their personal gains. These type of users are not good to trust eventhough they spread an image of being trusted.

I hope this gives a little insight of some of the users exclusions in my list.

[truth or dare]

Although I am not obliged to describe about my trust list but I want to share why I excluded Royse777 from my custom trust list. Reasons are below.

1. Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system: I think everyone know BestChange story, he/she had left counter feedback to BestChange with green trust which was not appropriate according to most of DT members. That was fine he withdrawn his/her green trust when realized it was wrong. So I can say he/she doesn't have enough knowledge how should use feedback. (However, perhaps he learned lately).

2. Retaliatory mentality, I am assuming Royse777 had excluded YOSHIE since he was thread opener against BestChange. I don't know exact reason why he/she have excluded me from his/her trust list, nor I will ask to him/her. But I believe I had not supported his counter feedback for BestChange and likely that's why he/she excluded me. If so really this is poor mentality but its depend on his/her who will be on his trust list. Also don't  know reason exclusion of TalkStar as well since TalkStar still trust Royse777 judgment. So personally I believe that kind of retaliatory mind won't fit on trust network.

So by considering both reason I have decided to exclude Royse777 from my trust list. I don't have complain about him/her, because he/she isn't obliged to explain about his own trust list. Both of reason is my personal opinion, it won't match with all over DT members and of course I appreciate everyone individual thoughts. I share it with community because other DT members would add him on their trust list or would exclude him from their trust list. But personally I think his/her judgment isn't perfect for DT network.

Here you can see his/her trust list.

Royse777 Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +30 / =0 / -0) (6420 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. OgNasty (Trust: +62 / =2 / -5) (758 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Cloudbet (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (97 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. suchmoon (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (41) 3545 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. DaveF (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. LoyceV (Trust: +25 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (50) 4590 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. The Pharmacist (Trust: +24 / =2 / -0) (2305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. DarkStar_ (Trust: +43 / =1 / -0) (1204 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. eddie13 (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 811 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Raja_MBZ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (693 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. hacker1001101001 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -2) (242 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3260 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. JSRAW (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (623 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. DdmrDdmr (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3218 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Royse777 Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~Blazr (Trust: #  +1 / =2 / -3) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -1) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~vlom (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (112 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~kzv (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 641 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~game-protect (Trust: !!!:  +0 / =3 / -46) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~johnsmithx (Trust: +0 / =2 / -1) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~mosprognoz (Trust: +7 / =1 / -1) (DT1 (-5) 161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~Coolcryptovator (Trust: +12 / =1 / -0) (1094 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~TalkStar (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~YOSHIE (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Royse777's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1! (2) 735 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. DaveF (Trust: +17 / =1 / -0) (533 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1546 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (956 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Raja_MBZ (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (693 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. El duderino_ (Trust: +26 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 3177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. akhjob (Trust: neutral) (223 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 1077 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. TalkStar (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 515 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 1miau (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 1744 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. The-One-Above-All (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -17) (56 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Royse777's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. TMAN (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (1233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -1) (124 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. morvillz7z (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 1151 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW YOSHIE (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (407 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Removed elmanchez (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (38 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.

I did whatever should I, anyone could do what they think. I don't like any arguments and drama. Perhaps someone would think why I have excluded him/her? Because point number two noticed just yesterday and I was quite busy and was not able to make post. I don't think we should exclude any person just for single disagreement on a subject.  If so then we should exclude 80% user of forum. This forum is for discussion and should be agreement & disagreements.  Sometimes even we do not agree with admin, it doesn't means we have to exclude him. I am not telling I am trusted person, but can say trusted more than who joined forum Today (newbie).

Are you claiming his actions are retaliatory for removing you because of X but now you remove him because he removed you?

Did you mean that or something else? or perhaps the timeline is confusing.

Are you 100% sure Tman didn't instruct you to create this drama at this precise moment. Asking for a friend?

Why not just make the adjustments to your list you feel are appropriate and tell royse777 if you need? or are you hoping others will follow you?

Your assumptions regarding the reasons for yoshi and talkstar and perhaps even yourself is perhaps because you have been members 5 minutes and have no place on default trust?

[The Cryptovator]

Was anyone asking you to give an explanation to exclude me? Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

Obviously NOT, but I think you missed the reason of this topic.

I share it with community because other DT members would add him on their trust list or would exclude him from their trust list.

~Snip~

I think your all the questions on the OP. And I am not something special that's other should follow me and I don't expect as well.

One of you are the one who include users in their trust list and ask for indirect favour in return in PM.

I can't remember if I have asked someone to add me. You should report to moderators for such as PM.

Are you saying those who excluded and included me are clueless about how the forum trust list works and only you have the required knowledge

Had I said? They would more experience from me and thats why I create this thread so they would see if my thoughts is right or wrong.

If this was something really you wanted to know or learn then you could just simply PM me instead of creating false impression of you being the innocent forum guy.

Already said the above. I am not saying I am innocent guy. A person can't be nice guy to all over forum user.

[AB de Royse777]

Was anyone asking you to give an explanation to exclude me? Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

Obviously NOT, but I think you missed the reason of this topic.

]I share it with community because other DT members would add him on their trust list or would exclude him from their trust list.

Still I do not see a valid reason.

 Are you saying those who excluded and included me are clueless about how the forum trust list works and only you have the required knowledge?

If this was something really you wanted to know or learn then you could just simply PM me instead of creating false impression of you being the innocent forum guy.

[TMAN]

Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system

that and the fact he is a busy pajeet cunt who deserves a shit envelope through his leterbox.

fucking wankstain royse cuntsmouth.

good move coolcryptolator.

xxx

[YOSHIE]

2. Retaliatory mentality, I am assuming Royse777 had excluded YOSHIE since he was thread opener against BestChange.

In fact I saw it a week ago after LoyceV updated the thread.
But I don't care and I also add @Royse777 to my list, not trust.
I assume that:
People who do and place trust incorrectly or are misused according to my knowledge are like a porcelain plate slammed to the ground, However...people in Japan have been using gold for sticking up a broken plate for a long time. In the form of things like this can be considered as appreciation, the more obvious lack of psychology, argument or pessimism, this also has in common.
If I can say to @Coolcryptovator in this case there is no need to worry and anxiety where one person does not recognize you, there are still dozens and hundreds of other DT members who acknowledge and trust you.

You have a good reputation in this forum.
Proverb says:
people who have (knowledge) fall asleep, a thousand times better, than people who worship do not have (knowledge).

[TalkStar]

In fact I saw it a week ago after LoyceV updated the thread.
But I don't care and I also add @Royse777 to my list, not trust.

Until yesterday i wasn't aware about this matter and discover that "Royse777" excluded me from his trust list. Till then he was in my trust list. I have also seen some other members name there including you and OP. After seeing this i didn't took that negatively because its not mandatory that everyone will accept my judgement positively where every single member have their freedom to trust someone or not. Its been a long time he was in my trust list but suddenly he feel it necessary to exclude some guys including me. I don't think its a big issue for me if anyone love to get wrong meaning from anything where actually that is nothing but a honest motivation.

People still exist who love to get motivated and i feel its my responsibility to notify him that he has been added on my trust list which doesn't mean that i am asking them to add me. Its a greetings for their well doings and for me they deserve that.   

Proverb says:
People with knowledge sleep, a thousand times better, than people who worship without having knowledge.

As far as i know proverb made from real life experiences and when its a matter of knowledge than i blindly believe that every people is nothing but a learner. Entire time frame of our life give us opportunities to gather knowledge and we shouldn't miss that.

[TMAN]

to exclude me

I have just had a message off forum that explains Royse777 actions, it seems he has been a cunt all his life, from pre school to school and now quite obviously to pre-adulthood. Royse was actually molested by his uncle Vlad - since then royse has become a little flower (not like an actual pussy flower) I mean an actual wilted rose, he was rejected by everyone he knows and then made himself into a "neckbeard Gentleman"

we all know what these "Gentlemen" are like, fat - ugly, shitty beards and wear dodgy fedora's.

he has a quest to make sure everyone else on the internet becomes a virgin (not anal virgin obviously) like him

women Reject him and he got angry - he started hitting up r/mallninjashit for inspiration, his collection of swords he cleaned every fucking day - he finally found his friends -people he could actually "connect with" he felt part of a community - anyway he was on reddit and for all our fucking sins this prick saw r/bitcoin - why the fuck didnt this just direct to bitcoin.com? this prick would be roger Ver's problem right now.

so Pajeetroyce ended up here, saw that sig campaigns paid more than he could earn in 80 hours working in the local factory..

anyway im bored now, but if anyone else requires TMAN to continue this story - appreciate below and I will continue fuckers..

xxxx

Royse, enjoy the stinky pillow.. I also shat underneath your bed earlier you cuntnugget

[eddie13]

You guys are really mad and starting a rep thread about Royse777 because he excluded you?

I thought I had Royse777 on my inclusions list but I guess not.. Adding now..
Fixed..

One of you are the one who include users in their trust list and ask for indirect favour in return in PM.

Oh?

There are some users who are in this community with certain goals to achieve for their personal gains. These type of users are not good to trust eventhough they spread an image of being trusted.

They are a bit ambitious aren't they?
Feel free to PM me if you think I should know anything..

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I didn't follow that BestChange thread and don't really know what the drama there is about, though I did take a peek and saw that they're not using an escrow--but in any case my opinion is this:  DT members rotate through and there's been a lot of change as far as what the list looks like, and no member is going to exhibit perfect characteristics of what it should mean to be on DT. 

So even if Royse777 changed some of his feedback and excluded a member for personal reasons, so what?  We've seen DT members do that before, many times.  DT members have been known to engage in vendettas and all sorts of other crap--but as long as their judgement is usually very good, and bad judgement isn't a pattern I don't see what the problem is.  So I think Royse777 is totally fine on DT unless someone can point me to an egregious error that he made, but I don't think there is one.

I have just had a message off forum that explains Royse777 actions, it seems he has been a cunt all his life, from pre school to school <snip>

If you feel like it, can you drop me a PM with some info on why he might not be a good fit for DT (or post it here)?  It's hard to glean the facts with all the vitriol flying about.

[Timelord2067]

Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

...and then you went and created this thread: daddy issue or schooling? thus eliminating the need to take the moral high ground. 

[The Cryptovator]

I thought I had Royse777 on my inclusions list but I guess not.. Adding now..
Fixed..

At least you have realized the purpose of this thread. Whoever want to exclude/include anyone they are free to do.

So I think Royse777 is totally fine on DT unless someone can point me to an egregious error that he made, but I don't think there is one.

Well, then you may add him as well.

...and then you went and created this thread: daddy issue or schooling? thus eliminating the need to take the moral high ground. 

Point is valid.

[AB de Royse777]

Imagine everyone is creating topics for each and every exclusion lol

...and then you went and created this thread: daddy issue or schooling? thus eliminating the need to take the moral high ground.  

Not sure where is the confusion. The thread you mentioned was created around two hours before creating this thread by OP. How was I suppose to know that OP was going to create a thread after around two hours? I don't have a time machine :-D

I also have no idea why OP had this topic in mind that he had to open an entire thread to explain the reasons of excluding me right after two hours of the topic I created. And coincidencely him, talkstar noticed it in the same day. I excluded both few weeks ago though.

I didn't follow that BestChange thread and don't really know what the drama there is about, though I did take a peek and saw that they're not using an escrow--but in any case my opinion is this:  DT members rotate through and there's been a lot of change as far as what the list looks like, and no member is going to exhibit perfect characteristics of what it should mean to be on DT.  

When Best Change launched their signature campaign they did not ask for an escrow. User Yoshi went and created a thread about it. TMAN and him tagged them. TMAN's reason was something like, without escrow they are scammer or something, I really can not remember much but to me the reason was really inappropriate and very very harsh for a campaign who just don't want to use escrow. Everyone have their right to practice how they conduct business. So I countered that neg with a positive which clearly stated that my positive was a counter of the negative TMAN left. And Yoshi's reason was too much inappropriate that he later removed his neg immediately after my response ¹.

That was it! TMAN started his mighty poetry on me, he even asked me to remove my trust list if I do not want to be in DT. It's like having a list means one only wants to be in the DT system Lol. (Shall I start saying loudly that exclude TMAN because he does not have fair knowledge of having a list? Of course Not! )

Having a list also means I trust or don't trust this and that users. Or I am wrong here?

@eddie13, I am not banned. I already responded your PM. Just woke up and writhing this from my phone. I will PM you later with some information.
¹ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217470.msg53603746#msg53603746

[TMAN]

All I can smell is used tampon smell vagina in every single one of your posts roysecunt

You don’t even understand that countering doesn’t work any more you wanknozzle you have no business being on DY or even on the fucking forum.

That campaign ended up paying out and I removed the neg but for every campaign that pays out there will be 4 that wouldn’t in that situation,

Prevention is better than cure you fucko. Like your father should of worn a rubber instead of having to think about aborting you

[eddie13]

@eddie13, I am not banned. I already responded your PM. Just woke up and writhing this from my phone. I will PM you later with some information.
¹ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217470.msg53603746#msg53603746

Yeah, TMAN went kinda crazy today with me poking him a little and mods deleting his posts n shit, and he had me thinking that he said you got banned, but it was just slippery tongue bullshit..

I am pretty familiar with the beginning of the Best Change situation but not the outcome thus far..
I didn't much like that they were tagged straight away either..

Prevention is better than cure you fucko.

"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." IMO

[YOSHIE]

And Yoshi's reason was too much inappropriate that he later removed his neg immediately after my response 1.

Basically I don't care about trust someone wants to trust or not, but now the story is different after I read the post @Royse777.

I will start the story of the campaign (BestChange) from the beginning.

Preliminary:

PROBLEM ONE:

Before the BestChange campaign, promoting on this forum, I first saw their involvement in a number of fraudulent customers on the BestChange site posted in 2017.

When the campaign started on this forum, I raised the topic about the BestChange site, Reputation: Topic: [Doubt the possibility of a scam] BestChange Bounty and Signature Campaign., To warn participants that you are promoting fraudulent sites, be careful because they do not use (escrow) most likely you are not paid, the main problem.

One by one the comments came, and I said if the campaign manager pays the first week and so on I will remove the trust for BestChange, I have already told @Royse777 about this.

the problem is that they pay on time to campaign participants. I revoked and closed the topic, finished.


PROBLEM TWO:

a second problem arises with something else still related to the BestChange site.

After a few days other accusations arose from @johhnyUA: Topic: About Bestchange [again]

So I reversed my direction 100% and I found other evidence about the trading site @BestChange, with the darkening of money.

Finally I don't trust him anymore about the BestChange site.

Proven to be deceptive.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219589.msg53667163#msg53667163

With the struggle of the members here.

In the end the money was returned.

If, the topic of accusations against the BestChange site in reputation is not made by me, the possibility is that the money @ SergeyMalar is USDT 21,010, don't know, maybe it's gone.

Because @SergeyMalar has created a topic in local Russia, no one cares about it. thank you, for: @johhnyUA.

Thank you, to the members in this forum and DT who are fighting for the rights of others, so that @SergeyMalar can be happy with his family again.


However, this trust issue arises here, so, I don't know what @Royse777 has in mind about this trust.


PROBLEM THREE:

off topic:
I really don't care anymore about the BestChange campaign whether you want to be paid or not.

So right now, if I associate it with the red trust in (BestChange), I can't make a decision because there are 11 DT members currently in it.

I respect their decision in this matter.

For now I am just waiting for the results of the 11 DT, against (BestChange). In making a decision to delete or not. red trust

So now I have explained the point of the problem now.

I apologize to @Royse777 and all who are here about this problem.
If anyone is not happy.
Now everything is clear the point of the problem from where.

For the issue of trust @ Royse777 which does not trust me, as I mentioned in the initial post.

[AB de Royse777]

And Yoshi's reason was too much inappropriate that he later removed his neg immediately after my response 1.

Basically I don't care about trust someone wants to trust or not, but now the story is different after I read the post @Royse777.

~snipped some useless explanations which were not happening at that timestamp~

Let's not bring the things that are not related to these topic in my opinion. The Best Change response from you to me was here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217470.msg53605122#msg53605122

The response was made to break the points I had here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5217470.msg53603746#msg53603746

And if I remember correctly then by then (before making the response) you changed your red to a neutral or entirely removed I guess after seeing my response for your red tag at that time. So your case is that: You are confuse (the way you change feedback based on the arguments) like hell on where to put red and where to put neutral or where to put positive.

Anyway, pointing to that post which was your response was enough instead of the wall of text you had in your last post bud.

Off topic:
If an ebay seller makes a mistake then you do not blame ebay as whole?
If an amazon seller makes a mistake then you do not blame the entire amazon company?

And you sir,

1. Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system

Can you find a feedback left by me which does look very inappropriate please?
Can you find a user who I have distrusted or trusted does look very inappropriate please?

/= You have problem for ~Coolcryptovator, ~TalkStar and ~YOSHIE?

Can I expect you to create separate topics for distrusting following users too?
1. ~iCEBREAKER (Trust: +6 / =0 / -2) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Blazr (Trust: # +1 / =2 / -3) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW ~Royse777 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 631 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW ~Patatas (Trust: neutral) (111 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~wolwoo (Trust: +1 / =2 / -3) (445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~mosprognoz (Trust: +6 / =1 / -1) (161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

/= And from now on whoever you distrust, I expect separate topics for each exclusion?
/= And your distrust list (6) seems very little compared to your entrust list (25). Amazingly very few of us has this ratio of entrust and distrust list (25:6).

I don't like any arguments and drama.

Nah! I don't like much too /s

2. Retaliatory mentality

This? Which one comes first to have a retaliatory mentality? If an action has done before or after?
Like if I distrust a user in my trust list after they distrust me or I entrust the user after they entrust me or I leave a favorable feedback after they left me a favorable feedback or I leave a red trust after they leave a red trust for me.

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-15_Sat_06.10h/366632.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632;dt

I am so confused with my retaliatory characteristics sir.

Yeah, TMAN went kinda crazy today with me poking him a little and mods deleting his posts n shit, and he had me thinking that he said you got banned

You think kinda?
This fella thinks he is an alpha from Baboon family and he is okay to smell his teen girl's tampon that just came out with rotten smelly blood and may be feels good to feel it on his d**khead.
He needs medical attention to live in a civilized society.

[The Cryptovator]

]Can I expect you to create separate topics for distrusting following users too?

Am I obliged? If no then you shouldn't expect.

/= And from now on whoever you distrust, I expect separate topics for each exclusion?

Answer is above.

/= And your distrust list (6) seems very little compared to your entrust list (25). Amazingly very few of us has this ratio of entrust and distrust list (25:6).

Am I missing something? Is there any guidelines or instructions from theymos about exclusion/inclusion ratio? Point me if I am missing.

/= You have problem for ~Coolcryptovator, ~TalkStar and ~YOSHIE?

All the problems have been described on main post. Doesn't necessary repeat again.

I am so confused with my retaliatory characteristics sir.  

It has been described  as well. For again I believe we had not talk each other before BestChange issue. So I were against your action & reaction there. I suspect as a retaliatory you excluded me & YOSHIE. If my suspection is right then you may realise this is retaliatory or not.


I stated that perhaps other DT1 wouldn't agree with me, everyone have different judgments and opinions. Same as for you, it doesn't matter you are agree or not, fact will not change based on our beliefs.
Since I am not on DT1 you shouldn't worry about my exclusion list.
Off topic;
Perhaps sometimes we forget about what does mean ~exclude, +include and no action( means not include or exclude).

[AB de Royse777]

So you are here to play political game with me? Seems like you have learnt a new vocabulary - "obliged" /reputation sucker.

Let's play the same game as you did in your last post:

Perhaps sometimes we forget about what does mean ~exclude, +include and no action( means not include or exclude).

Am I missing anything? Where is the guideline from theymos about this please? Point me sir if I am missing.

Since I am not on DT1 you shouldn't worry about my exclusion list.

Did I say I worry about you being anywhere?

I stated that perhaps other DT1 wouldn't agree with me, everyone have different judgments and opinions.

Has anyone said everyone will have the same judgements?

Same as for you, it doesn't matter you are agree or not

Did I say something has to be different for me?

fact will not change based on our beliefs.

Have I or anyone said that facts can be changed?

And what facts we are talking about here Mr. Smarty pant? I can play game all the day if you insist me. But please don't. I am happy to hangout with a small community I like, just around the corner of the forum.

You may not see me in reputation and meta board very often to throw mud to each others by taking some shelter of established members but this does not mean that I will be bad to play political game with you or anyone who are like you and your pal talkstar. Remember my birth in this community was way longer than you. You born not very long ago when all those merit suckers and trust suckers has started hanging around in the meta and reputation board with some useless merit begging threads and activities to get attention of the other forum members to have personal gains. Now see why I distrusted you and your pal? I am not playing "obliged" game here by the way.

Perhaps you need to learn another vocabulary: Retaliatory.
Seek help from Google.