 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
Washington Capitals 1 @ 0 Anaheim Ducks
|
|
|
|
|
New England Patriots 28 @ 35 Atlanta Falcons
|
|
|
|
Please email me with your information, explain the problem in the code, http://moonco.in - go to the bottom and click download sources. You can view the entire source - I would really appreciate it if you point out the problem you see. I will fix it soon as I can and even compensate users for lost funds if possible. Sent you a PM here on the forum. Thank you, your time is very much appreciated. |
|
|
|
Please email me with your information, explain the problem in the code, http://moonco.in - go to the bottom and click download sources. You can view the entire source - I would really appreciate it if you point out the problem you see. I will fix it soon as I can and even compensate users for lost funds if possible. Sent you a PM here on the forum. Thank you very much I will take a look now and stop wasting my time here =) |
|
|
|
Honestly you should quit while you are ahead and stop engaging your opposition like you have recently. That's the same thing coinhunter did and it made him look like an ass as well as piss people off.
You honestly can't see the difference? My post are level headed and humble. I'm not afraid of admitting mistakes, I ask for help from the community, I take responsibility for issues that exist and work to fix them in a timely manner. If these people have serious concerns I want to address them, what I have realized after 3 pages of trolling is that their claims seem to be unsubstantial. If they do email me with problems though - I will correct them and compensate any lost funds. I don't think this makes me look bad, I think if anything it shows that I'm a level headed person who is capable of taking criticism. That is a good quality in a business owner and a programmer. I don't think Realsolid can say the same unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Ok maybe this style is more your liking.
The style you make absurd claims without evidence? 1) You charge fees - Admitted Hrm, no I did not admit I charge fees. Because I do not charge any additional fee over the transaction cost. In fact the entire time you have been posting in this thread the OP specifically explained it in parenthesis. But you aren't into facts, evidence just wild speculation for the sake of comedy I guess? 2) Phony Whois - Admitted Yes, and it will be corrected. I still maintain its far more important for the HTTPS cert to be legitimate when it comes to security. 3) Two decimal place ripoff - Admitted Did I admit to that? Really? You are really something. 4) Conversion errors - Admitted HAHA Where? Can you read? I maintain throughout the entire thread that you should share with me this flaw if it does in fact exist. IF it did exist I would fix it. PLEASE POST IT IF IT EXIST.and we haven't even talked about the illegal gambling, Amateur Gmail, SQL Injection Vulnerabilities or Slowness in payouts yet.
Do you still wonder why I called the remaining exchanges pathetic or why you might be tad bit suspect?
All these claims you could not support earlier but now are suddenly facts? |
|
|
|
Now all of the flaws surface as he tries to run with the big dogs and gets all butt hurt like another SC developer when people simply point out the flaws.
Am I missing anything?
Just one thing. The part where the experienced coder in the room suspects Mr.Moon may be serious about wanting to make his exchange better and tries to offer a bit of help. So reserve at least some of your judgment until you see how he responds to the attempt at an olive branch and some well-intentioned information. Please email me with your information, explain the problem in the code, http://moonco.in - go to the bottom and click download sources. You can view the entire source - I would really appreciate it if you point out the problem you see. I will fix it soon as I can and even compensate users for lost funds if possible. I'm very serious about improving the site and I wish to help create something that will help the whole cryptocurrency community in the long run. |
|
|
|
Mr. Moon gets some code from Betco.in that he really doesn't understand or know or control. Throws it on a site and putts along very quietly because he was a low volume site. No one paid any attention. Suddenly he becomes the number one exchange after the others quit due to Coinhunter's dick maneuver.
Now all of the flaws surface as he tries to run with the big dogs and gets all butt hurt like another SC developer when people simply point out the flaws.
Your posting style is really obnoxious you realize? The bolding and large text and colors really isn't necessary. So you are just going to go for ad-hom insults now and attack me personally rather then actually show problems with my code? |
|
|
|
I'm going to take a guess but Mr. Moon here is starting to walk the same path as coinhunter. That path is the path of destruction if he keeps confronting his opposition. Quit while you're ahead dude.
I don't really think I'm embarrassing myself. I'm giving level headed responses to trolls, because I suspect I might gain some useful information that could help me improve my code. I'm pretty sure any rational person would read this thread that way. However, you don't come out looking so good with your contentless cheerleading posts. From your posts history I'm guessing you don't really care about your reputation though. |
|
|
|
@MrMoon
Is this really necessary every post? What about the two decimal place withdrawal limit?
It is already on my list of things to do. |
|
|
|
Post the relevant code or even post the thread. I would be happy to look at it and resolve any issues brought up. Otherwise you are just an immature troll who is bringing nothing to the discussion. The help text on the site has always said there is a transaction fee taken by the network that we do not cover, so those who said there was small amounts missing from withdrawals were simply not reading the help text on the page. I can try to make it more clear if you feel it was not obvious enough. |
|
|
|
@MrMoon
You sir started all of this in response to a statement I made to Coinhunter saying that with the closing of Bitparking and Ruxum that there were only three pathetic exchanges left. You sir have provided the proof for that statement.
I never called out Mooncoin, you jumped out and made a challenge as to why I said that. I simply have responded.
Well I guess that means you have to finish it right? Thats the mature way to have a discussion. So now you are making the claim you were not calling my exchange pathetic, even though its one of three solidcoin exchanges left? Look, I don't care if you call my exchange pathetic. I'm a open source software developer, I have tough skin. I just want to know the specifics, I want to sit back down with the code and improve it. I never wanted to get into a pissing match, when I responded to you I was looking for ways I could make my exchange more suitable for everyone. |
|
|
|
|
I took that off, just for you Ill say I charge a transaction fee. You would love to make it seem like I'm underhanded but that is just not simply the case.
The transaction fee pays the network fee that I'm charged for sending payments. That fee is passed on. I do not charge any additional fee ontop of that network fee, that is why I felt it was fair to claim that. If you really insist that it is not fair, fine you win. I changed it. However if you want to say that calls my character into question - well you don't really have much credibility after 3 pages of mindless trolling, copying and pasting, wild accusations, vague speculation about security issues and much more.
|
|
|
|
I was actually asking the question. And to be really, really blunt about this?
If you are running an exchange it is your responsibility to understand what the code you are using does. If you can't answer "Do you use decimal data types?" you should not be running an exchange.
The fact that all you do is spout the "open source, open source, it's your obligation to help improve it" line seems to indicate you don't even know the difference between the two. It is not my responsibility to make your site work correctly, it is _YOURS_, as you want to make money from it. If you actually want me to spend a great deal of my time analyzing your code to determine that it is free of IEEE precision errors in computation or storage, PM me for my rates.
In all the time that took to type this you could have copied and pasted the issues you claim that exist and really showed me up. I suspect the real reason you didn't paste them though is because you just made unsubstantial claims that just aren't true. Nice job acting like real solid. Again quality posting. |
|
|
|
7. You're skimming micro amounts off the conversion transactions (didn't think people would notice). Let me guess, they're rounding errors LOL
There, Mr.Moon, as requested. Citation for math errors. The use of floats or doubles in financial code will frequently cause this exact symptom. [Edit: Removed orphan header line from quote] You still have yet to show any examples in my code. Do you not want to help improve my open source project? Or are you just needlessly attacking me because I have some vague association with solidcoins? What is so ironic is that you criticize realsolid for doing exactly what you are doing right now. He refused to help Gavin out, but rather just said there was problems without ever specifying them. Its really funny in a way. |
|
|
|
@MrMoon
You clearly stated over and over "There are no transaction fees"
When cornered with the fact that there seems to be math errors during the conversion process, you called it and I quote
"I keep fees from every transaction".
Either you do charge transaction fees or you got caught skimming.
Which is it?
I don't keep fees from every transaction, if that is what I posted I meant to say that I don't keep fees but rather they are immediately used for network transaction fees. If I had to eat these fees I would go bankrupt, I do not keep any of the fee. If this is really the only issue you have though, I will gladly remove that line from my advertising. |
|
|
|
This is the only legitimate concern I see, but the reason is I want to separate my personal life from this. And trolls like you and drama like this last weekend only makes me feel confident in that decision.
holy shit... sure, lemme go ahead and deposit my funds with a fake whois. just wow. You do realize you have to have an ID on file to get a real SSH, which should be the one you would be concerned about right? Nope. Don't even know what a SSH is. Just rubs me the wrong way about the whois. My mistake, I meant https cert. It is the certificate that lets you know you are really connecting to me and not someone else. The whois will be corrected. |
|
|
|
You realize you are acting just like Realsolid acted to Gavin when Gavin asked for the specifics about the security hole that Realsolid claimed existed within bitcoin?
Good job.
I'm not talking about a security hole here. I'm talking about basic math performed by the exchange being correct. If you don't know the difference between double and decimal you are not qualified to run an exchange, and if you can't answer the question about which you use then you're proving your exchange isn't legit. Since someone already pointed out there are math errors, it's a legitimate question. I'm not required to verify whether you're doing it wrong. If you're operating an exchange then it's your responsibility to know what the code you run does. No one has pointed out math errors, I have asked you to do it but you refuse too. Copy and paste the code that has the math errors if they exist, its open source. Seriously this is mind numbing. |
|
|
|
I actually thought of that but then he would have accused me of trolling him. When he first opened the site ... I was trying to be nice.
Since not everyone has English as a first language it occurred to me he might not know, well, the 'less official' meaning of the word moon, and I sent him a short polite PM just to make sure he wasn't caught unawares.
And since he already has a huge problem with anything that isn't sucking up to CoinHunter or his precious crappy exchange...
First you didn't message me when I opened up the site, you messaged me several months afterwards. I also gave you a respectful response, I even shared the story of how I derived the name. And yes you have trolled this thread relentlessly and provided zero content. I'm over this though, clearly there are no active moderators on this forum, so why should I even bother, just feeding trolls. |
|
|
|
This is the only legitimate concern I see, but the reason is I want to separate my personal life from this. And trolls like you and drama like this last weekend only makes me feel confident in that decision.
holy shit... sure, lemme go ahead and deposit my funds with a fake whois. just wow. You do realize you have to have an ID on file to get a real https cert, which should be the one you would be concerned about right? |
|
|
|
|
